| By Robert Davies, James Strachan | Article Rating: |
|
| August 10, 2005 10:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
56,213 |
Today's enterprise applications are distributed by design. For applications to interact with one another over networks optimally, they require Service Oriented and Event Driven Architectures made up of loosely federated business resources, that interact by exchanging requests (for data delivery and integration, as well as for services) and that can handle streams of diverse business processes in real-time. To support large-scale, enterprise integration, organizations need to adopt strategies that rationalize the infrastructure for integration based on the requirements of business/IT organization itself. The only successful integration efforts are those that provide agile, pervasive and low cost solutions in order to cater to today's diverse deployment environments, while fully leveraging available standards.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), which can be defined as middleware that brings together both integration technologies and runtime services to make business services widely available for reuse, offers the best solution for meeting today's enterprise application integration challenges by providing a software infrastructure that enables SOA. However, there are currently a number of different vendors that provide ESB solutions, some of which focus purely on SOAP/HTTP and others who provide multi-protocol capabilities. Because these vendors span the horizon from big enterprise generalists (app servers), to mid-tier enterprise integration providers, all the way to smaller, ESB/integration specific-providers - there doesn't seem to be an established consensus regarding the key requirements for an ESB.
As application architects, we have often thought about what requirements would define an ESB designed specifically to cater to the needs of an agile, enterprise integration model. In building for these specific requirements, we realized that we actually needed to develop a new type of ESB - hence the ServiceMix project.
Characteristics of an Agile ESB
The main criteria we were looking for in our ESB are as follows:
- Standards based - While standards-based support is marketed by many ESB vendors, the support is provided externally, requiring developers to work with proprietary APIs when directly interacting with internal APIs. ServiceMix was designed with the requirement to eliminate product API lock-in, by being built from the ground up to support the Java Business Integration specification (JSR 208). Our agile ESB needs to use JBI as a first class citizen, but also support POJO deployment for ease of use and testing.
- Flexible - Another characteristic of an agile ESB is the flexibility with which it can be deployed within enterprise application integration framework: standalone, embedded in an application component, or as part of the services supported by an application server. This allows for component re-use throughout the enterprise. For example, the binding for a real-time data feed might be aggregated as a web-service running within an application server, or streamed directly into a fat client on a traders desk. An agile ESB should be able to run both types of configurations seamlessly.
To provide rapid prototyping, an agile ESB should support both scripting languages and embedded rule engines, allowing business processes to be modeled and deployed quickly.
Some have argued that integration functionality is best place at the edges of the network. Others prefer a logical ESB server to be separate from the edges - to keep the edges simple and lightweight. Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses - so we wanted an ESB that is simple and lightweight to deploy into any JVM or into a web server or a full Java EE server - reusing all the available facilities in which it is deployed.
- Reliable - Our ESB needs to handle network outages and system failures and to be able to reroute message flows and requests to circumvent failures.
- Breadth of Connectivity - An agile ESB must support both two way reliable Web-services and Message Oriented-Middleware and needs to co-operate seamlessly with EIS and custom components, such as batch files.
We also wanted our agile ESB to be vendor independent and open source, to promote user control of source code and direction. An added benefit of this is not only the zero purchase cost, but the total cost of ownership will be reduced where users are actively contributing and maintaining our ESB.
We rapidly came to the conclusion, that as there was no single product that would adequately meet our needs, we'd have just go a head and build one!
What Is JBI?
There has been a fair amount of buzz about JBI and there is some confusion over what JBI (JSR 208) is.
JBI is a simple API to a Normalized Message Service and Router along with a component and management model for deploying integration services such as routing engines, BPEL engines, rule systems, transformation engines etc.
JBI provides a logical XML messaging network which maps well to web services, HTTP, email and JMS/MOM while easily adapting to legacy systems, binary transports and RPC systems like EJB and CORBA. Think of it as the next logical abstraction above JMS, with support for different message exchanges (one way, request response etc).
The binding components deal with all the plumbing and protocol stuff, then service engine components work on a logical XML layer, providing content based routing, orchestration, rules, transformations and custom enrichment etc.
So BPEL engines no longer need to deal with all of the possible protocols, transports and wire formats; they can just delegate to JBI for the physical routing to service endpoints. Similarly content based routers, rules engines, transformation engines can sit on the JBI bus and do their thing. JBI is looking like being a great API for integration component developers.
Many application developers will still end up writing POJO services and dropping them into their container and exposing them as web services - so often they won't need to use the JBI APIs directly; but for integration vendors and open source integration projects, JBI provides a way for us to all work together at the ESB level and to reuse integration containers, components and tooling.
ServiceMix
ServiceMix is an open source (Apache licensed) Enterprise Service Bus which is compliant with the Java Business Specification (JBI), JSR 208.
ServiceMix already provides JBI support for Apache Geronimo, the first application server to provide this feature.
Published August 10, 2005 Reads 56,213
Copyright © 2005 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Robert Davies
Rob Davies is chief technology officer at FuseSource. One of the original members of the team, he co-founded LogicBlaze which was purchased by IONA and is now FuseSource. Prior to working for Logicblaze, he was a founder and the CTO of SpiritSoft which was purchased by Sun Microsystems. Rob has over 20 years experience of developing high performance distributed enterprise systems and products for telcos and finance, and is best known for his work at the Apache Software Foundation where he co-founded the ServiceMix, ActiveMQ, and Camel projects. He is now the PMC chair of ServiceMix and continues to be an active committer on all three projects. You can read his blog, On Open Source Integration, or follow him on twitter.
More Stories By James Strachan
James Strachan, technical director at IONA, is responsible for helping the Company provide open source offerings for organizations requiring secure, high-performance distributed systems and integration solutions. He is heavily involved in the open source community, and has co-founded several Apache projects, including ActiveMQ, Camel, Geronimo and ServiceMix. He also created the "Groovy" scripting language and additional open source projects such as dom4j, jaxen and Jelly. Prior to joining IONA, James spent more than 20 years in enterprise software development. Previously, James co-founded LogicBlaze, Inc., an enterprise open source company acquired by IONA. Prior to that, he founded SpiritSoft, Inc., a company providing enterprise Java middleware services.
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Linux Virtualization and Tired Open Source Myths
- IGEL Supports Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.0
- CloudLinux Announces Support for Atomia
- Amazon Kindle Fire Gets Its Own 'Personal Cloud Desktop' with AlwaysOnPC App Launch
- SPIRIT DSP Receives 2011 INTERNET TELEPHONY Product of the Year Award
- Hadoop Quickstart: Use Whirr to automate standup of your distributed cluster on Rackspace
- Jury Gets Novell Antitrust Case Against Microsoft
- The Utility Infrastructure Security Market 2012-2022: Cybersecurity & Smart Grids
- FORTUNE Magazine Names Rackspace Among “100 Best Companies to Work For”
- EnterpriseDB Announces Availability of Postgres Plus Cloud Database
- iFollowOffice Turns to Virtual Bridges and Savvis for On-Demand Virtual Desktop Services
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Amazon to Rent Out Supercomputers
- Amazon Émigré Starts Network Monitoring Firm
- HP’s Putting a Back Door in the Itanium Alamo
- Linux Virtualization and Tired Open Source Myths
- CloudLinux Announces Preferred Partner Program
- MapR Pushes the Hadoop Envelope
- Rightware Announces Gaming Performance Benchmark for OpenGL ES 3.0/Halti
- IGEL Supports Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.0
- CloudLinux Announces Support for Atomia
- 3Dconnexion Announces its Newest 3D Mouse - the SpaceMouse Pro
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- Why Recovering a Deleted Ext3 File Is Difficult . . .



















