| By Christian Donner, Sumitra Chary, Jim Lamoureaux, Ilia Papas, Dita Vyslouzil | Article Rating: |
|
| February 5, 2006 12:45 PM EST | Reads: |
20,731 |
SIDEBAR
Tivoli Access Manager
The production security configuration followed the recommendations for Tivoli implementations published by IBM. The setup consisted of two WebSEAL servers, two Web/application servers, one policy server, and a master/replica LDAP configuration. The application servers hosted all of the applications with WebSEAL tying to each application through an IP/Port specific junction (a "junction" is a resource mapping and defines the true location of a URI). This necessitates multiple network cards in the WebSEAL machines in order to support multiple host addresses that are on the standard Web port.
Each production WebSEAL instance had numerous junctions configured to the multiple applications. The configuration was also set up for failover by ensuring that the server UUID configured in the junctions matched on each machine; therefore cookies for session fail-over could be picked up by either WebSEAL instance.
Choosing to install the Authorization Server on each application server created policy server redundancy. The authorization servers act as a replica of Policy server information. As a default, when the authorization server is installed, the application server does not hit the policy server directly in most cases because it obtains authorization information directly from the authorization server. The only time the policy server is reached is for any account updates. All these settings can be found in a configuration file (webseald.conf). Choosing to follow the authorization server route ensures application availability in case the policy server is down - it's a more economical method for fail-over than a master/replica policy server configuration.
Sidebar 2
Configuring Ant for Deployments Between Different Application Servers
We used Ant (Ant 1.6+) to manage configuration, builds, and deployments from local development environments to the integration server, from there to the staging server, and finally to production. The ant scripts needed to handle two main server differences:
- The WEB-INF/lib directory had to be populated with any JARs not provided by the application server. Specifically, our Tomcat environment required the optional JDBC 2.0 Package while WebSphere already came with the necessary classes installed.
- The security-* elements of the Web deployment descriptor (web.xml) needed to include security-role definitions for deployments to Tomcat. In WebSphere, the security roles were defined at the enterprise application level (application.xml).
The solution was to treat any environment dependencies through parameters and to create configuration files that contained all settings for a server type. We laid the groundwork by explicitly providing a value for the server.type Ant property:
<!-- Server Type property-override customizations (if any) -->
<property name="server.type.config.file"
location="${build.modules.home}/deployment/servertypes/${server.type}.properties"/>
<echo message="server.type.config.file=${server.type.config.file}"/>
<property file="${server.type.config.file}"/>Having a separate properties-file for each server type was helpful, because it made the deployment process agnostic of the type of server that we deployed to. The main property set in each of these files was deploy.tomcat or deploy.websphere (essentially deploy.server-type). Having these properties allowed us to configure the build-war macro according to the server type to handle the inclusion/exclusion of the JDBC 2.0 optional package (see Listing 1).
Only one of the war-* targets is being called depending upon whether the deploy.websphere property is defined or not. This results in a macro definition of build-war, which has been configured for the target server.
Similarly simply, the appropriate definitions for the security-* elements of the web.xml are handled according to the value of server.type.
<!-- Copy the environment-specific version of the web-security.xml XDoclet merge file -->
<target name="web-security-websphere" if="deploy.websphere">
<copy file="${web.merge.dir}/was-web-security.xml"
tofile="${web.merge.dir}/web-security.xml" overwrite="yes"/>
</target>
<target name="web-security-tomcat" unless="deploy.websphere">
<copy file="${web.merge.dir}/tomcat-web-security.xml"
tofile="${web.merge.dir}/web-security.xml" overwrite="yes"/>
</target>The targets web-security-tomcat and web-security-websphere are then named as dependencies in other targets that use the XDoclet webdoclet task (which uses the web-security.xml deployment descriptor snippet).
Listing 1: Ant macro for building a WAR file
<!-- Call the build-war macro that is defined by the dependencies -->
<target name="package-web"
depends="webdoclet,war-tomcat,war-websphere">
<build-war/>
</target>
<!-- Setup the build-war macro for a tomcat deploy -->
<target name="war-tomcat" depends="" unless="deploy.websphere">
<macrodef name="build-war">
<sequential>
<war destfile="${web.dist.dir}/${web.war}"
webxml="${web.build.dir}/WEB-INF/web.xml"
compress="true">
<fileset dir="${web.build.dir}" excludes="**/web.xml" />
<webinf dir="${struts.dir}" includes="validator.xml,*.dtd" />
<lib dir="${cfmx.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib dir="${commons-lang.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib dir="${dist.dir}" includes="${dist.name}" />
<lib dir="${jstl.lib.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib dir="${struts.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib file="${commons-dbcp.jar}"/>
<lib file="${commons-pool.jar}"/>
<lib file="${log4j.jar}" />
<lib file="${spring.jar}" />
<lib file="${jdbc.jar}"/>
<lib file="${jtds.jar}"/>
</war>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
</target>
<!-- Setup the build-war macro for a WebSphere deploy -->
<target name="war-websphere" depends="" if="deploy.websphere">
<macrodef name="build-war">
<sequential>
<war destfile="${web.dist.dir}/${web.war}"
webxml="${web.build.dir}/WEB-INF/web.xml"
compress="true">
<fileset dir="${web.build.dir}" excludes="**/web.xml" />
<webinf dir="${struts.dir}" includes="validator.xml, *.dtd" />
<lib dir="${commons-lang.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib dir="${dist.dir}" includes="${dist.name}"/>
<lib dir="${jstl.lib.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib dir="${struts.dir}" includes="*.jar" />
<lib file="${commons-dbcp.jar}"/>
<lib file="${commons-pool.jar}"/>
<lib file="${log4j.jar}" />
<lib file="${spring.jar}" />
<lib file="${jtds.jar}"/>
</war>
</sequential>
</macrodef>
</target>
Published February 5, 2006 Reads 20,731
Copyright © 2006 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Christian Donner
Christian Donner has 20 years of experience in project delivery and consulting. His professional focus includes EAI, BI, CRM, supporting business strategy through the development, implementation, and maintenance of mission critical systems. He is a senior technical architect at Molecular, a Web consulting firm located in the Boston area, and has written for both Java Developer's Journal and .NET Developer's Journal. He can be reached at pubs2005@cdonner.com.
More Stories By Sumitra Chary
Sumitra Chary is a senior software engineer at Molecular. Her career has spanned both academic and commercial worlds. These have included software systems for X-ray observatory missions, network management, marketing automation, and enterprise Web applications.
More Stories By Jim Lamoureaux
Jim Lamoureaux is a senior consultant and software architect at Molecular. His interests include object-oriented design and implementation, programming languages, and software process. Jim is a Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform. He currently lives in Southern New Hampshire.
More Stories By Ilia Papas
Ilia Papas is a software engineer at Molecular. He has been working with web applications for five years and has interests in the design and implementation of enterprise applications using a variety of technologies. He currently lives in the Boston area.
More Stories By Dita Vyslouzil
Dita Vyslouzil is a Consultant and Technical Architect in the Engineering group at Molecular in Watertown. She has been in software development for 7 years, concentrating in transactional web applications.
![]() |
SYS-CON Italy News Desk 02/05/06 01:37:22 PM EST | |||
In a market that is defined by today's tight IT budgets, saving on software licenses can mean the difference between financial failure and success for a software development project. While our corporate clients use commercial-grade application servers, we sometimes find ourselves in a situation where there are no funds for developer licenses of these commercial application servers. Out of necessity, we developed and implemented a process that allows for development on top of an open source stack, while production delivery relies on a commercial application server. |
||||
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- Cloud Computing Can Revitalize Your Career as Software Developer
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Yahoo! SVP Shelton Shugar to Discuss Innovation at Cloud Computing Expo
- Virtualization Journal "Readers' Choice Awards" Voting Is Now Open
- Einstein, Sharks and Clouds: IT Security in the Cloud
- Adobe Flex Developer Earns $100K in New York City
- Virtualization Expo Call for Papers Deadline December 15
- Amazon Web Services Database in the Cloud
- Kindle 2 vs Nook
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- 1st Annual GovIT Expo: Letter from the Technical Chair
- Ulitzer News: Search vs New Media
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- Confessions of a Ulitzer Addict
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- Twitter, Linked In, Ning and Ulitzer: Easy Personal Branding Strategy
- My Thoughts on Ulitzer
- Tactical Cloud Computing Panel at 1st Annual GovIT Expo
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- i-Technology Viewpoint: The New Paradigm of IT Buying
- Is Linux Desktop-Ready Yet...or Not?




























