| By Gilad Parann-Nissany | Article Rating: |
|
| January 13, 2013 10:46 AM EST | Reads: |
938 |
Your Porticor appliance can encrypt data being stored to Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3). Porticor is the only system available that offers the convenience of cloud-based hosted key management without sacrificing trust by requiring someone else to manage the keys. Porticor’s split-key encryption technology protects keys and guarantees they remain under customer control and are never exposed in storage; and with homomorphic key encryption, the keys are protected – even while they are in use.
A variety of applications use S3 to store bulk data, and we support two different ways of enabling Porticor encryption with them.
- The first and recommended alternative is to configure the application so that data is written to and read from the Porticor appliance.
- Where this is not an option, you can instead configure host-to-IP mapping so that the application writing to s3.amazonaws.com actually writes to the appliance, which encrypts and forwards the data to S3.
These are two options to set up your environment, but the end result is one and the same: your data is encrypted when written to S3 and decrypted when reading from it, with no need to change the client application.
What follows are detailed instructions for both configuration options.
Alternative 1: Explicit Configuration
This alternative depends on the individual application. In fact some S3 clients are hardwired to the Amazon server addresses and cannot be configured. For these clients you must use Alternative 2.
In this alternative you configure the S3 client to connect to a special DNS address for each of your buckets and for the main S3 endpoint. These DNS addresses are installed automatically when you add your S3 “buckets” into the table on the S3 Encryption page. All buckets that are to be encrypted must be listed. If your bucket is called mylittlebucket, it will be mapped to the DNS name mylittlebucket.d.porticor.net.
The specific client configuration depends on the particular client. Following are two examples.
Configuring s3cmd
Edit the file $HOME/.s3cfg, and replace the host_base and host_bucket lines as below, where the long host_base value is your appliance’s address.
# old: # host_base = s3.amazonaws.com # host_bucket = %(bucket)s.s3.amazonaws.com # new: host_base = itbetb19zy3-pzjy3yty2zw.d.porticor.net host_bucket = %(bucket)s.d.porticor.net
Configuring S3QL
Edit $HOME/.s3ql/authinfo2, and add a new section:
[porticor] storage-url: s3c://itbetb19zy3-pzjy3yty2zw.d.porticor.net/bucket-name/ backend-login: aws-key-id backend-password: aws-secret-key
To create the file system, run:
mkfs.s3ql --plain --ssl s3://bucket-name/ mount.s3ql --ssl s3://bucket-name /mnt/cloud-drive
Note the use of the “s3c” URL method. Both the --ssl and --plain flags are mandatory.
Alternative 2: Host Mapping
With this alternative you configure the host on which your S3 client is running, so that s3.amazonaws.com and bucketname.s3.amazonaws.com are resolved to the IP address of the Porticor appliance. You should not fill in the Bucket table in this alternative.
On Linux, edit the file /etc/hosts and add the lines shown below.
On Windows, add these lines to %windir%\system32\drivers\etc\lmhosts (or ...\hosts, depending on your Windows version).
Appliance-IP bucketname.s3.amazonaws.com # replicate this line for each S3 bucket Appliance-IP s3.amazonaws.com
Use the so-called “private” IP address (10.x.x.x) of the Porticor appliance, for access from within the EC2 cloud. If you plan to access the appliance from outside the cloud or even from another AWS region you will need to use “public” address instead. Both addresses are listed in the S3 Configuration GUI page.
All communication with the virtual appliance is SSL-protected. In Alternative 2, you should make sure that your project’s CA certificate is installed on the client machine, otherwise your S3 client might refuse to connect.
Additional Notes
- You need to wait a few minutes after the creation of a new bucket before starting to use it, so that it is recognized by all S3 servers.
- Note that Porticor does not support “mixed buckets” containing both protected and unprotected objects.
- Bucket names must conform with the requirements for DNS names, as recommended by Amazon Web Services. In particular they must not contain uppercase letters.
The post S3 Encryption With Porticor appeared first on Porticor Cloud Security.
Read the original blog entry...
Published January 13, 2013 Reads 938
Copyright © 2013 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Gilad Parann-Nissany
Gilad Parann-Nissany, Founder and CEO at Porticor is a pioneer of Cloud Computing. He has built SaaS Clouds for medium and small enterprises at SAP (CTO Small Business); contributing to several SAP products and reaching more than 8 million users. Recently he has created a consumer Cloud at G.ho.st - a cloud operating system that delighted hundreds of thousands of users while providing browser-based and mobile access to data, people and a variety of cloud-based applications. He is now CEO of Porticor, a leader in Virtual Privacy and Cloud Security.
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- AMAX Launches StorMax(TM) CFS, powered by IBM(R) General Parallel File System(TM) (GPFS(TM))
- NIST to Sponsor FFRDC Widespread Adoption of Integrated CyberSecurity
- Red Hat Hires Azure Guy to Run Virtualization
- Project Floodlight Grows to the World’s Largest SDN Ecosystem; Global Users, Contributors and Partners Innovating Using Open Source SDN
- Cloud Business Solutions, Social Media, and Platform Systems of Engagement Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2013 to 2019
- HotLink Debuts Amazon EC2 Plug-in for Microsoft SCVMM with Latest Release of HotLink Hybrid Express
- Rackspace and Red Hat Celebrate Victory over Troll
- SugarCRM’s New Private Cloud Piggybacks on Amazon
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Portable Experimenter’s Platform, Powered by Raspberry Pi
- SUSE Receives Common Criteria Security Certifications
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Granular Enforcement of Access to File Systems Featured in Latest Release of FoxT ServerControl
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Red Hat Spin-Off Simplifies Orchestration
- AMAX Launches StorMax(TM) CFS, powered by IBM(R) General Parallel File System(TM) (GPFS(TM))
- NIST to Sponsor FFRDC Widespread Adoption of Integrated CyberSecurity
- Red Hat Hires Azure Guy to Run Virtualization
- Project Floodlight Grows to the World’s Largest SDN Ecosystem; Global Users, Contributors and Partners Innovating Using Open Source SDN
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- Why Recovering a Deleted Ext3 File Is Difficult . . .























