Welcome!

Linux Containers Authors: Zakia Bouachraoui, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: @DXWorldExpo, @CloudExpo, Apache

@DXWorldExpo: Blog Post

The NoSQL Database World Has Matured By @MapR | @CloudExpo [#BigData]

How NoSQL went from a quick and dirty alternative to RDBMSs, to a critical component of many enterprise data architectures

5 Ways the NoSQL Database World Has Matured Over the Years

With the proliferation of NoSQL databases in recent years, it can be easy to forget that not long ago, we were all discussing how to optimize traditional relational databases to perform tasks for non-relational workloads. Before we were talking about cost-effective horizontal scaling, flexible data types, and extremely fast data accesses, the world was all about the relational database management systems (RDBMS).

To provide a quick recap of the long-running, pre-NoSQL years, RDBMSs organized data into two-dimensional tables, containing all the details of each element in rows. Examples of these include Oracle, MySQL, DB2, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL. These systems continue to work well for applications that have consistent, predefined data structures such as ERP, CRM, and analytical reporting.

As the desired volumes for data collection and storage increased — especially with the advent of Apache Hadoop and big data — the RDBMSs struggled to remain cost-effective. That’s where NoSQL came into play. In the early days, NoSQL was seen as a quick and dirty alternative to RDBMSs, but they have since become critical components of many enterprise data architectures today. Consider the ways NoSQL databases have matured over the years.

What’s in a Name
Perhaps the first schism in the evolution of NoSQL was the meaning behind its name. Originally dubbed NoSQL in opposition to Structured Query Language (aka, SQL, the popular computer language for interacting with databases), or more precisely, RDBMSs, the name represented an abbreviation of the declarative “no to SQL.” In this early stage, NoSQL aspirations positioned it as a replacement for RDBMSs by offering a more cost-effective and flexible technology.

That aspiration was short-lived, however, as it was clear that RDBMSs still had a vital role in enterprise data architectures, and that NoSQL databases were more about using the right tool for the job. As a result, the term NoSQL evolved into the backronym, “not only SQL,” thus acknowledging that NoSQL is ideal for a new set of use cases, not the use cases for which RDBMSs already excel.

Interestingly, the NoSQL term is widely disliked by those in the industry for a variety of reasons. One major reason is that the name is actually a misnomer, as the NoSQL movement was about moving away from the rigid, predefined table structures of the relational model, and not a rejection of SQL. In fact, more and more NoSQL databases are adding SQL or SQL-like interfaces, making the name even more imprecise. Perhaps in the next few years we can expect a significant name change that more accurately describes the NoSQL technologies, and hopefully it will be a term that many of us will actually like.

Reliability
In the early days, the overwhelming reaction to NoSQL was that while it provided greater flexibility and scalability, it couldn’t be trusted to reliably store and retrieve data. The running joke among the veteran database die-hards was that NoSQL was acceptable only if you could afford to lose data. The jokes would go so far as to claim NoSQL was only useful for showing cat photos on websites.

Considering that even the huge RDBMS vendors sold products for many years that suffered from frequent crashes and data loss, it’s not surprising that NoSQL databases shared a similar start. But many NoSQL databases today are a far cry from the early versions, offering stronger data reliability that make them suitable for enterprise deployments. This has opened the door for NoSQL to support business-critical environments that require guaranteed high availability and disaster recovery, including large-scale applications that store sensitive personal information at some of the world’s largest financial services firms.

Expanding the Menu
At first, perhaps influenced by the stigma surrounding its reliability, NoSQL was almost exclusively used for so-called “commodity data,” i.e., data that needs to be stored and accessed but isn’t expected to provide high strategic value to the business or its customers. Examples included data for web page statistics, application state management, and system configurations. Businesses were quick to accept NoSQL for its cost-effective storage of commodity data, but weren’t yet ready to trust it with their most valued data.

These days, more types of data from the financial services, manufacturing, energy, and other industries are stored in NoSQL databases. Storage of sensitive customer information, critical machine sensor data for operational intelligence, and revenue-generating web content are among the more common uses for NoSQL today.

Convincing the Old Guard
Like all disruptive technologies, NoSQL’s biggest opponents from the outset were the developers and administrators facing a fundamental change to their modus operandi. With their experience and expertise on the trusted RDBMSs, would it seem interesting at all for them to pursue NoSQL?

NoSQL could be perceived as a threat to job security, reducing the need for database administration in favor of something closer to simple maintenance that would ensure the database stayed up and running. Also, database purists didn’t like the thought of tossing out ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties meant to guarantee that database transactions were processed reliably in RDBMSs. Critics pointed to early NoSQL failures, some of which were on a grand scale, to underscore the value of using a tried and true technology like RDBMSs.

NoSQL today is no longer seen as merely a trend, and has escaped from its early challenges, unlike the object-oriented databases and their quest to gain traction in an RDBMS-centric world. The leading NoSQL vendors today have much stronger reputations for big successes than for big failures. Much of the baggage, real and perceived, of the early generations of NoSQL databases has been left behind. Even the old guard of the RDBMS world is accepting NoSQL as a viable component in their enterprise architecture, and enterprises are finding that if they don’t explore NoSQL technologies, they are leaving themselves at a disadvantage.

What’s Old is New
NoSQL databases are beginning to look a lot like RDBMSs from certain angles. As an example, keeping in mind that “relations” in the relational model are tables, some NoSQL databases like Apache HBase and MapR-DB have table structures that essentially make them superficially look relational. They use the familiar columns and rows, with the added benefit of supporting “sparse data” in which you might have many possible columns per row, but only some of which are actually populated. This data model is important when you store records that differ in attributes across the entire database, which is a model that RDBMSs cannot handle efficiently.

A growing and significant trend is the use of SQL query engines to access NoSQL databases, which make more NoSQL systems look relational. Open source projects like Apache Drill provide SQL access to a variety of data formats, including JSON (JavaScript Object Notation), thus bringing relational capabilities to systems that are not based on the relational model. With the ubiquity of SQL and the rise of NoSQL, you can expect more enterprises to run third-party business intelligence and analytics tools in a “SQL-on-NoSQL” stack, thus blurring the differences between NoSQL and RDBMSs from an end-user perspective.

What’s Up Next?
NoSQL has come a long way since a database was first described using the term, and there’s still a long way it can go. According to figures from Market Research Media, the global NoSQL market will reach $3.4 billion in 2020, representing a compound annual growth rate of 21% for the period of 2015 - 2020.

What can we expect in the coming years? It’s probably no question that there will be a lot of interesting innovations, and maybe some that few could have predicted today. Let me excuse myself from making any bold predictions here, so I’ll stick to some of the foreseeable next steps. For example, SQL-on-NoSQL will continue to gain traction to let organizations use familiar desktop tools on more data sources. As mentioned earlier, perhaps a name change to NoSQL is in order. More vendors and databases will continue to appear, in an already hot and perhaps crowded market. And as the phenomenon of big data becomes more commonplace in enterprises around the world, the more successful NoSQL vendors will deliver architectures that enable tighter, more real-time integrations with Hadoop.

More Stories By Dale Kim

Dale is Director of Industry Solutions at MapR. His technical and managerial experience includes work with relational databases, as well as non-relational data in the areas of search, content management, and NoSQL. Dale holds an MBA from Santa Clara University, and a BA in Computer Science from the UC Berkeley.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...