Linux Containers Authors: Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Stackify Blog

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

DOJ-Microsoft agreement: It's not a sellout, it's surrender

Agreement doesn't change anything, it's full of exceptions, and it has no teeth. Otherwise, it's great.

(LinuxWorld) -- If I hired a lawyer to negotiate a settlement with a predatory monopolist, a monopolist found by a federal judge, and by a federal appeals court, to have violated antitrust law in a number of ways to maintain and extend its monopoly illegally, and he or she produced a settlement like the proposed settlement between the DOJ and Microsoft, I would not just fire them. I would kick them out the door and warn them never to darken it again. Then, I would try to have them disbarred.

How bad is it? It's so bad that headlines appeared the day the settlement became public quoted Attorney General John Ashcroft saying "This is not a sellout." Ashcroft's denial sounded eerily similar to a denial heard 30 years ago when Nixon gave his famous "I am not a crook" speech.

There are three major problems with the settlement. In reverse order of magnitude, its failures are:

  • It doesn't go far enough in regulating Microsoft's future behavior. This means the agreement changes nothing.
  • The weak restraints it puts in place are more riddled with exceptions and loopholes than any possible combination of UCITA/EULA Redmond might imagine. As a result, almost none of the proposed remedies will be capable of imposing even the mild restraint intended. Instead, the settlement becomes a Bill of Rights for the monopoly, validating behaviors and practices shown to have been illegal in the proceedings.
  • It has no teeth. There are no penalties or consequences for failing to abide by its terms. The best deal those crafty winning litigators at the DOJ could get in the entire document was an equal voice with Microsoft in naming the three-person team responsible for oversight. That's the equivalent of not just letting a condemned prisoner choose the menu for his last meal, but letting him set the date, time, and location for it as well.

Even if adequate remedies had been articulated, and even if those remedies had not been emasculated by the exception mania that makes up the majority of the settlement text, they are meaningless without penalties in place for violating them.

The decree supposedly offers protections for computer makers, ISVs, IHVs, and users. If all you read is the hype flaunted jointly by the DOJ and Microsoft, you might end up with that impression. A closer reading, however, shows that it is Microsoft's interests that are protected.

Conduct (not) prohibited against OEMs

The first item addressed under the heading of "Prohibited Conduct" is retaliation against OEMs by Microsoft. This is definitely a necessary ingredient in a sufficient final judgment, and it is one of the things that can transform Microsoft from acting like the 800-pound gorilla it has been in its life as an unregulated monopoly into an honest business partner.

The so-called "Redmonian Death Penalty" has been threatened against the world's largest OEMs should they pursue a course of action in conflict with Microsoft's desires. IBM was forced to stop marketing OS/2 to get a license for Windows 95. Compaq was threatened with the loss of its license to preload Windows because of Compaq's planned use of Netscape.

Under the terms of the settlement, Microsoft can no longer penalize OEMs for offering products that compete with Microsoft platforms. OEMs will even be free (imagine that) to offer dual-boot machines featuring non-Microsoft operating systems.

Note, however, that nothing restricts Microsoft from penalizing OEMs for doing other things. What kind of other things? Anything at all not specifically stated in the settlement. In fact, the settlement protects Microsoft's right to penalize OEMs when it states: "Nothing in this provision shall prohibit Microsoft from enforcing any provision of any license with any OEM or any intellectual property right that is not inconsistent with this Final Judgment."

In other words, Microsoft is free to continue to act like an 800-pound gorilla in situations other than offering a product that competes with a Microsoft platform or that "distributes or promotes" non-Microsoft middleware. If, for example, Dell decides to offer Intuit or Real Player instead of Microsoft Money or the Windows Media player, Microsoft is hereby given permission to squeeze them until it hurts. How? Well, they could double the cost of Microsoft Office, for one thing. Nothing in the settlement prohibits it. Dell or whichever OEM it might be would still have to cave in to Microsoft's desires. Nothing changes.

The second restraint is against favorable pricing, with Microsoft being required to offer "Covered OEMs" uniform agreements with uniform terms and conditions. Microsoft will determine the pricing and allow the U.S. and "Covered OEMs" access to it. Differences in pricing are allowed for different language versions of Windows and for volume breaks, so long as they are offered on a uniform basis.

Protection for ISVs nebulous

The second group offered protection by the decree are ISVs. They are protected from retaliation and are afforded documentation to allow interoperability with Microsoft platforms. However, there are severe restrictions on the documentation, and Microsoft gets to decide who gets it and who doesn't. Open source/free software folk should not count on being included among the group that does. The decree validates the Microsoft theft of Kerberos from the open source community and specifically excludes Microsoft from the burdensome necessity of documenting the interface. This keeps the server space safe for the monopoly, but it does nothing for the rest of us.

Users are the last group to be considered. But they've been given freedom, too. Now they can add and remove icons and shortcuts to their desktops. Subject to restrictions, of course. Microsoft is restrained from changing OEM desktop settings for 14 days after the initial bootup of the PC. After that? Microsoft's right to do anything it pleases after that is part of the settlement that will make the world safe for, not safe from, the predatory monopolist.

Have I mentioned the exceptions included in the settlement? The strongest language in the document is not that restraining Microsoft's actions. It is the part of the settlement restricting the power of the settlement. Quoting from section J:

J. No provision of this Final Judgment shall:

1. Require Microsoft to document, disclose or license to third parties: (a) portions of APIs or Documentation or portions or layers of Communications Protocols the disclosure of which would compromise the security of anti-piracy, anti-virus, software licensing, digital rights management, encryption or authentication systems, including without limitation, keys, authorization tokens or enforcement criteria: or (b) any API, interface or other information related to any Microsoft product if lawfully directed not to do so by a governmental agency of competent jurisdiction.

The last part of the paragraph above doesn't make any sense to me. Not unless it is there so that Microsoft will never have to explain the NSA key found in their code. Or have to disclose any other hooks and backdoors they have installed or plan to install. Automatic software upgrades at the whim of Microsoft could easily be made to make specific machines susceptible to government eavesdropping. A crazy conspiracy theory? Probably. There has to be some reason for that statement, and for the settlement as a whole. If the government hasn't gotten something from Microsoft, even just a means for illegal wiretaps, then Ashcroft is right. It's not a sellout. It is a complete and utter surrender of the interests of the American people -- by the people sworn to protect those interests -- to the will of Microsoft.

Other hoops that have to be jumped to see API Documentation from Microsoft are left up to Microsoft. I guess the DOJ didn't want to get too involved and thought it best to leave the issues to the experts. One qualifier goes like this: "Meets reasonable, objective standards established by Microsoft for certifying the authenticity and viability of its business." Another requires Microsoft's approval of any program written based on the use of such documentation.

Your opinion, please

The brazen incompetence and dereliction of duty that was at work in producing this "settlement" boggles the mind. For all the hard work of the people involved in dragging Microsoft through the courts the past few years, exposing layer after layer of its lies, misdeeds, hidden and predatory business practices, work ending in the findings of fact and of law as set forth originally by Judge Jackson, then upheld by an appeals court meeting en banc, to be thrown out, erased, and forgiven by Ashcroft is an absolute disgrace.

Perhaps the administration meant to send a signal to big business that now they have friends in high places. There are other messages sent as well. The big one is quite clear. Corporations, the super rich, the friends of the administration are free from all those pesky laws designed to ensure the public good. They simply do not have to play by the same rules as everyone else. With a wink, a nod, and a denial of a sellout, the administration will take care of its friends.

Of course, there is still the chance that the remaining states will fare better in the court than the DOJ did in the settlement. On second thought, they could hardly do worse. Good for them for not selling out. Citizens will have their chance to comment on the proposed final judgment for a period of 60 days beginning later this week, when the document is scheduled to be published in newspapers around the country. The name and address at the DOJ to receive those comments should be available as soon as the settlement is published. I plan to submit my comments, and I hope you do too.

More Stories By Joe Barr

Joe Barr is a freelance journalist covering Linux, open source and network security. His 'Version Control' column has been a regular feature of Linux.SYS-CON.com since its inception. As far as we know, he is the only living journalist whose works have appeared both in phrack, the legendary underground zine, and IBM Personal Systems Magazine.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

@ThingsExpo Stories
It is of utmost importance for the future success of WebRTC to ensure that interoperability is operational between web browsers and any WebRTC-compliant client. To be guaranteed as operational and effective, interoperability must be tested extensively by establishing WebRTC data and media connections between different web browsers running on different devices and operating systems. In his session at WebRTC Summit at @ThingsExpo, Dr. Alex Gouaillard, CEO and Founder of CoSMo Software, presented ...
Most people haven’t heard the word, “gamification,” even though they probably, and perhaps unwittingly, participate in it every day. Gamification is “the process of adding games or game-like elements to something (as a task) so as to encourage participation.” Further, gamification is about bringing game mechanics – rules, constructs, processes, and methods – into the real world in an effort to engage people. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robert Endo, owner and engagement manager of Intrepid D...
Recently, WebRTC has a lot of eyes from market. The use cases of WebRTC are expanding - video chat, online education, online health care etc. Not only for human-to-human communication, but also IoT use cases such as machine to human use cases can be seen recently. One of the typical use-case is remote camera monitoring. With WebRTC, people can have interoperability and flexibility for deploying monitoring service. However, the benefit of WebRTC for IoT is not only its convenience and interopera...
Michael Maximilien, better known as max or Dr. Max, is a computer scientist with IBM. At IBM Research Triangle Park, he was a principal engineer for the worldwide industry point-of-sale standard: JavaPOS. At IBM Research, some highlights include pioneering research on semantic Web services, mashups, and cloud computing, and platform-as-a-service. He joined the IBM Cloud Labs in 2014 and works closely with Pivotal Inc., to help make the Cloud Found the best PaaS.
Everything run by electricity will eventually be connected to the Internet. Get ahead of the Internet of Things revolution. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Akvelon expert and IoT industry leader Sergey Grebnov provided an educational dive into the world of managing your home, workplace and all the devices they contain with the power of machine-based AI and intelligent Bot services for a completely streamlined experience.
Cloud-enabled transformation has evolved from cost saving measure to business innovation strategy -- one that combines the cloud with cognitive capabilities to drive market disruption. Learn how you can achieve the insight and agility you need to gain a competitive advantage. Industry-acclaimed CTO and cloud expert, Shankar Kalyana presents. Only the most exceptional IBMers are appointed with the rare distinction of IBM Fellow, the highest technical honor in the company. Shankar has also receive...
Business professionals no longer wonder if they'll migrate to the cloud; it's now a matter of when. The cloud environment has proved to be a major force in transitioning to an agile business model that enables quick decisions and fast implementation that solidify customer relationships. And when the cloud is combined with the power of cognitive computing, it drives innovation and transformation that achieves astounding competitive advantage.
Personalization has long been the holy grail of marketing. Simply stated, communicate the most relevant offer to the right person and you will increase sales. To achieve this, you must understand the individual. Consequently, digital marketers developed many ways to gather and leverage customer information to deliver targeted experiences. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Lou Casal, Founder and Principal Consultant at Practicala, discussed how the Internet of Things (IoT) has accelerated our abilit...
In his session at Cloud Expo, Alan Winters, U.S. Head of Business Development at MobiDev, presented a success story of an entrepreneur who has both suffered through and benefited from offshore development across multiple businesses: The smart choice, or how to select the right offshore development partner Warning signs, or how to minimize chances of making the wrong choice Collaboration, or how to establish the most effective work processes Budget control, or how to maximize project result...
To get the most out of their data, successful companies are not focusing on queries and data lakes, they are actively integrating analytics into their operations with a data-first application development approach. Real-time adjustments to improve revenues, reduce costs, or mitigate risk rely on applications that minimize latency on a variety of data sources. In his session at @BigDataExpo, Jack Norris, Senior Vice President, Data and Applications at MapR Technologies, reviewed best practices to ...
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, a director and senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, discussed the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
In his keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Sheng Liang, co-founder and CEO of Rancher Labs, discussed the technological advances and new business opportunities created by the rapid adoption of containers. With the success of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and various open source technologies used to build private clouds, cloud computing has become an essential component of IT strategy. However, users continue to face challenges in implementing clouds, as older technologies evolve and newer ones like Docker c...
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Two weeks ago (November 3-5), I attended the Cloud Expo Silicon Valley as a speaker, where I presented on the security and privacy due diligence requirements for cloud solutions. Cloud security is a topical issue for every CIO, CISO, and technology buyer. Decision-makers are always looking for insights on how to mitigate the security risks of implementing and using cloud solutions. Based on the presentation topics covered at the conference, as well as the general discussions heard between sessio...
To Really Work for Enterprises, MultiCloud Adoption Requires Far Better and Inclusive Cloud Monitoring and Cost Management … But How? Overwhelmingly, even as enterprises have adopted cloud computing and are expanding to multi-cloud computing, IT leaders remain concerned about how to monitor, manage and control costs across hybrid and multi-cloud deployments. It’s clear that traditional IT monitoring and management approaches, designed after all for on-premises data centers, are falling short in ...
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that the upcoming DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO New York event will feature 10 companies from Poland to participate at the "Poland Digital Transformation Pavilion" on November 12-13, 2018.
Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
The best way to leverage your CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO presence as a sponsor and exhibitor is to plan your news announcements around our events. The press covering CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO will have access to these releases and will amplify your news announcements. More than two dozen Cloud companies either set deals at our shows or have announced their mergers and acquisitions at CloudEXPO. Product announcements during our show provide your company with the most reach through our targeted audienc...
In an era of historic innovation fueled by unprecedented access to data and technology, the low cost and risk of entering new markets has leveled the playing field for business. Today, any ambitious innovator can easily introduce a new application or product that can reinvent business models and transform the client experience. In their Day 2 Keynote at 19th Cloud Expo, Mercer Rowe, IBM Vice President of Strategic Alliances, and Raejeanne Skillern, Intel Vice President of Data Center Group and ...