Welcome!

Linux Containers Authors: Liz McMillan, Jason Bloomberg, Zakia Bouachraoui, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

Richard Stallman: The Free Software Movement *Is* Politics

The Free Software Movement teaches computer users to value freedom

[Dee-Ann LeBlanc mused recently here at LinuxWorld.com on the vexed question of whether in the Linux community we are letting politics have too much sway over and above the technology. Here are Richard Stallman's thoughts on that same issue, just received...far from sharing this worry, on the contrary he is concerned that a narrow focus on technological developments "might distract our best activists from doing their best work..."  ]


"Dear editors of LinuxWorld,

When I read Ms LeBlanc's surprised reaction to the idea that "Linux" is about politics - initially negative, followed by an acknowledgment that it may have become so - I was struck above all by the irony. This operating system was launched to be about politics, starting with its announcement 20 years ago this month:

Starting this Thanksgiving I am going to write a complete
Unix-compatible software system called GNU (for Gnu's Not
Unix)... I consider that the golden rule requires that if I like
a program I must share it with other people who like it... So
that I can continue to use computers without violating my
principles, I have decided to put together a sufficient body of
free software so that I will be able to get along without any
software that is not free.

If the idea that the GNU/Linux operating system is about politics comes as a surprise to many of its users today, this is because they have forgotten its origin. The practice of calling the entire system "Linux" has led many to suppose it was started by Linus Torvalds in 1991. (Torvalds developed a kernel which, once freed in 1992, filled the last gap in the nearly complete GNU operating system.) They often say that the GNU project developed "tools," diminishing its real aim.

The only idea of the GNU/Linux system's purpose that they have encountered is Torvalds' self-described "apolitical" vision, the vision of the Open Source Movement, so many of them make this vision their inspiration. Some go so far as to say that technology should not be sullied by non-technical concerns - espousing an idea of "pure technology" that explicitly rejects the lesson, so painfully learned from World War II, that engineers have a duty to consider how their work may affect society.

But you cannot keep your freedom by making technical advance your only goal. In 1983, we computer users had lost our freedom to cooperate: the only way you could buy a modern computer and run it was to sign a nondisclosure agreement, promising not to share with your friends, you could not tell what the program really did, and you could change it only by patching the binary. Regaining this freedom required 20 years of persistent effort, but we can lose it again much more quickly if we fail to defend it.

The Free Software Movement teaches computer users to value freedom, so they will defend it. Recognizing the value of freedom yourself is the first step in helping to do this.

Sincerely
Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project"

More Stories By Richard Stallman

Richard Stallman is the founder of the Gnu Project, launched in 1984 to develop the free operating system GNU (an acronym for "GNU's Not Unix"), and thereby give computer users the freedom that most of them have lost. GNU is free software: everyone is free to copy it and redistribute it, as well as to make changes either large or small. He is the principal or initial author of GNU Emacs, the GNU C Compiler, the GNU Debugger GDB and parts of other packages. He is also president of the Free Software Foundation (FSF).

Any copyright notice in his articles supersedes all copyright notices on the SYS-CON and Ulitzer sites.

Comments (14) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Eduardo "Tião" Barbosa 06/22/04 11:04:18 AM EDT

I believe Mr. Handley´s point of view is very interesting. The movement is not "simply" about politics and the ideal of freedom that started it all. The political issue is a contitutive part of the movement, as much as the technological "advances" in software development are the horse-power that keeps us on our feet, strugling with proprietary software users/developers about our side of the tide.
I believe the point here is not to forget our political responsabilities. The Free Software movement makes a statement to the world, that we cannot deny. And we say "let code be free!", because we understand, by living within this major industrial revolution, that the work we do CANNOT be taken away or be restricted. It must return to were it came from, your local community, the gnu/linux community, other developers, the users, the world wide web.
This, of corse, is lost within the repressive enviroments, be those of "Dilbert" or Orwell´s "1984".

Daniel C. Handley 03/07/04 09:24:31 PM EST

I mistakenly placed all of the free software movement under the "Open Source" banner, and for that I apologize. But what I was getting at is that the movement, whatever the title, has moved beyond simply being "political". There are those who still maintain that ideal, and that's wonderful. But to simplify GNU/Linux in such a manner is faulty. That was the mentality that started it all, but it is not, by any means, the only motive that sustains the movement.

The Free Software movement is what began the push to return to shared code, and marvellously so. But it's the Open Sourcers that have become the "flagship" (for lack of better term) which is publically driving it. I share the belief that freedom is the ideal we should all live by, but that ideal is not what prompts an organization like IBM to pour billions into development. It's the stability, security, and availability of a worldwide development community that promotes such involvement.

Perhaps I was mistaken when I read RMS's article, but it almost seems like a total abandonment of all ideals which are not his own, much like a religious fundamentalist would reject all others who don't agree. I am simply trying to make the point that free software licensed under the GPL or GPL-like licenses are proving to be highly effective, regardless of the ideal or motive it is developed under.

Daniel C. Handley 03/07/04 09:24:21 PM EST

I mistakenly placed all of the free software movement under the "Open Source" banner, and for that I apologize. But what I was getting at is that the movement, whatever the title, has moved beyond simply being "political". There are those who still maintain that ideal, and that's wonderful. But to simplify GNU/Linux in such a manner is faulty. That was the mentality that started it all, but it is not, by any means, the only motive that sustains the movement.

The Free Software movement is what began the push to return to shared code, and marvellously so. But it's the Open Sourcers that have become the "flagship" (for lack of better term) which is publically driving it. I share the belief that freedom is the ideal we should all live by, but that ideal is not what prompts an organization like IBM to pour billions into development. It's the stability, security, and availability of a worldwide development community that promotes such involvement.

Perhaps I was mistaken when I read RMS's article, but it almost seems like a total abandonment of all ideals which are not his own, much like a religious fundamentalist would reject all others who don't agree. I am simply trying to make the point that free software licensed under the GPL or GPL-like licenses are proving to be highly effective, regardless of the ideal or motive it is developed under.

J.B. Nicholson-Owens 03/07/04 06:59:08 PM EST

Handley misattributes the community to the wrong movement. The community we're a part of is the free software community because it was started by RMS to pursue software freedom. The open source movement exists within the free software community and the open source movement didn't start for over a decade after the community had been built. Thus, it would not be fair or reasonable to give the open source movement credit for the work in building our community.

Also, it's not "free source" advocates, it's free software advocates. RMS, unsurprisingly, mentions the name a number of times in his essay.

The license that is the most widely used came from the Free Software Foundation--the GNU General Public License (or GPL). It was in use well before the open source movement came to be. So, let's try to give credit where credit is due and learn recent history so we understand what the two movements are saying and then we can make informed choices about which movement we want to back.

Daniel C. Handley 09/26/03 10:03:44 PM EDT

I am glad to see Mr. Stallman's much-needed response. But there is something he seems to overlook. To "free source" advocates, it is very political, in a moral and ethical sense. But there are many views about shared source. My view is that open source is more economically viable in the long run.

No matter how one feels, the greatest thing about open source is not a matter of one view over another. We all see things differently. In the open source community, we can all agree to disagree, and still accomplish miraculous things. That diversity is our greatest advantage.

I'm glad to see those like Richard Stallman fighting for free speech and free technology. Mr. Stallman is right. But so are Linus Torvalds, Eric Raymond, IBM, HP, and all other open sourcers. Each has his or her own motive, but together, our differing views can only strengthen the magnificent and powerful force that is the open source community!

V. Aldridge 09/26/03 09:31:54 PM EDT

Freedom is so easily given up every day. Unfortunatly, most of us simply try and drag ourselves through the day and the idea of politics and loss of freedom rarely grace our thoughts except in a small passing way. Simple truths are what we can deal with and simple truths are what we are willing to accept. Freedom requires you to be engaged in the world and to perceive the desires of some few to mislead us and trouble our thoughts with lies and half truths so that we surrender those treasured freedoms and be controlled for their sakes. As an MCSE I understand the MS approach but I also understand what GNU/Linux means to the world as a whole. It will change society, and freedom of the heart and the mind is never ever a bad thing. Through those things are found peace, not through absolute control.

Mr. Stallman and Mr. Torvalds have my deepest admiration and support....

Jonny L Gent P.E. 09/26/03 08:56:45 PM EDT

Thank you Richard for the consistent message. It never waviers and is right on the mark. I enjoy the benefits and security of many peoples work and say thank you everyday.

Thank you and I will continue to support Free software and GNU/Linux.

M Graeber 09/26/03 06:49:10 PM EDT

What Stallman and Torvalds have initiated will some day be viewed as the greatest cultural achievement of the 20th century.

W. Grimm 09/26/03 09:15:07 AM EDT

I think Mr. Stallman is correct; we had better get political if we are not already, because there are people out there who will take away our freedoms and our software if we do not. The "richest man in the world" wants to force you to run his software, and no other, on your computers.

I also believe that if the US is to continue to play a major role in the worldwide computing industry, that we should embrace Open Source- this is where the future lies. The world is not going to accept proprietary products like MS Windows for much longer.....

A Smith 09/24/03 12:14:49 AM EDT

There's been a lot of speculation about SCO's motivation for their war on Linux. GROKLAW appears to have discovered the definitive documents from way back in February (before SCO filed suit against IBM).

In short, it all started about shared libraries, the idea was to combine UNIX/Linux and possibly wipe out all SCO's competitors, to put SCO on top of the food-chain over Red Hat and other Linux companies, and to force IBM to settle because of SCO's claimed ability to revoke IBM's AIX license.

For full details, read http://www.groklaw.com/

Terrell Prude', Jr. 09/22/03 04:50:51 PM EDT

Actually, Stallman says that "Free Software" is political, not "Open Source." The "Open Source" movement came about as an effort to *remove* talk of freedom--a political subject--from the conversation and speak pretty much only of technical benefits to business. The Open Source folks, like Perens and Raymond, are right in that there are certainly benefits to business on merely technical merits (witness the Internet and what powers it). I also thank those two for their work in promoting Free Software ("Open Source" is billed as a marketing arm for Free Software). However, it is the Free Software movement that made so prevalent today the mindset of people collaborating together--by example. It is the Free Software movement's GNU GPL that is now our strongest buttress against the likes of SCO. It is the Free Software movement that made the ethical decision to create a truly Free operating system (GNU). Without the Free Software movement, "Open Source" would never have had a foundation on which to exist.

No, I am not Richard Stallman--I can only wish to be that intelligent. I simply recognize the wisdom in what he says. I thank him and the Free Software movement every day I use a computer, and yes, I proudly use and deploy GNU/Linux (several distributions).

Alex 09/22/03 03:48:39 PM EDT

People say "everyone should live under a democracy". A democracy is more and more becoming about individuals `human rights', our personal freedoms.

Free/libre software including Linux is for the people that have made it happen about having tools with which they are free to do what they wish in the ways described in the Free Software Foundations software freedoms. The ability to do such is a right.

I think these days unlike at Stallmans outset freedoms are dissolved gently rather than cut off. So people grow accustomed to their absence and don't notice and don't realise what they have lost. So we live in a ever more cosy and safe world, that would be as boring as hell but for tv

Randall Poznan 09/22/03 11:39:22 AM EDT

Richard Stallman thanks for what you do! This work is appreciated, and greatly important.

As long as large companies want monopolistic control of computing, politics will come into play. Keep fighting for the right to build, use, and distribute open src.

George X 09/22/03 08:28:59 AM EDT

Being involved in GNU/Linux for just one month i am sure it is politics. It is made with the purpose to spread knowledge and not to restrict it. But i don't think forgetting this is a matter of memory, it's mainly the way people "consume" products including software, without caring for the side effects of the use of these products.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...