Welcome!

Linux Containers Authors: Zakia Bouachraoui, Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

SCO's IP Gamble

Looking at the challenges from a legal point of view

Anyone reading this is likely aware of The SCO Group's claim to intellectual property (IP) rights in the Linux kernel. SCO hired legal guru David Boies (who prosecuted the government's case against Microsoft) and initiated a two-pronged litigation and marketing attack.

To recap: in March 2003 SCO sued IBM for breach of its software agreements with SCO, misappropriation of SCO's trade secrets in Unix, and wrongful dissemination of those trade secrets via IBM's contributions to open source and Linux. In May, SCO wrote to 1,500 of the world's largest companies, asserting that Linux infringes SCO's IP rights and that end users may face legal liability from the use of Linux. In July, SCO registered for copyrights in its Unix-based systems, and in August announced the availability of a $699 per CPU system "license" for Linux end users "to cure the SCO IP infringement issues for Linux operating systems." And SCO has engaged in an aggressive press campaign, repeatedly asserting that Linux software developers violated SCO's Unix IP rights.

It's no secret that SCO is banking heavily on its IP strategy to achieve profitability after years of multiple million-dollar losses. SCO acknowledged that licensing income would be used in part to "continue our intellectual property protection and licensing initiative," i.e., funding its legal battles with IBM and others such as Red Hat, who initiated a lawsuit against SCO in August in an effort to clear the SCO-created cloud from Red Hat Linux. The plan has worked so far, as SCO's Q3-FY2003 results show positive net income (due primarily to $7.3 million in licensing revenue) and its stock price has risen eightfold since March.

While the open source community fumes, SCO's IP strategy is far from new. As an industry matures, it becomes a target for IP holders. The semiconductor industry saw an explosion of patent litigation in the 1980s, as companies jockeyed for market share and used their IP to protect that share and generate revenue. Texas Instruments, for example, reported patent licensing revenue of $521 million in 1993, primarily from its semiconductorrelated patents; this was more income than TI made from selling semiconductor products. IBM itself is no stranger to the IP game, reportedly realizing $1.7 billion in patent royalties in 2001. And well-known organizations such as the Lemelson Foundation and Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing do not make or sell products at all, but generate billions of dollars in revenue from patent litigation and licensing.

SCO's effort to emulate these companies, however, is a long shot at best. SCO's asserted IP rights are limited to copyright and trade secrets, whereas successful licensors historically rely on patent rights. The differences are significant. One key distinction is that patent infringement is a strictliability claim; a company so charged cannot rely on the fact that it independently designed the infringing technology. In contrast, copyright and trade secret claims are both subject to the defense of independent creation. Another difference is that welldrafted patents may provide very broad protection over a particular invention, for example, by covering all methods of producing a product or achieving a specific result. Source code copyright claims, however, require more than showing that the offending code achieves the same result as the copyrighted code – there must be evidence that the offending code was copied, at least in part, from the copyrighted code.

These differences mean that IBM and Red Hat may defeat SCO's copyright and trade secret claims by showing they independently wrote the Linux code in question. Further, trade secret claims may also be defeated by showing the "secret" was not properly maintained or was subject to discovery through reverseengineering. This latter point is particularly relevant, as SCO openly marketed UnitedLinux 1.0, and therefore arguably disclosed the very trade secrets (presumably, Unix functionality – SCO has been vague on this point) it now seeks to protect.

SCO faces other challenges. In a countersuit, IBM claimed that SCO's distribution of UnitedLinux was subject to the terms of the General Public License (GPL), and that SCO's attempt to collect licensing fees violates those terms. IBM also sued SCO for patent infringement, asserting four patents against a broad array of SCO products.

Without its own patent claims, the deck is stacked against SCO, and if IBM and/or Red Hat succeeds on the merits, SCO's IP claims against others will be toothless. Nonetheless, there are very few certainties in litigation, as IBM and Red Hat well know. If SCO mounts enough of an attack to sustain the cases towards trial, the risks may be too great for IBM and Red Hat to continue, and settlement is possible. If that occurs, the rest of the industry best be prepared to open its checkbook. And while SCO may be the first to attack the open source community, history shows others will follow. As the popularity of Linux grows, the suppliers of Linux operating systems (i.e., those that generate revenue from Linux product sales) inevitably become a more inviting target for IP holders worldwide.

More Stories By Brian Ferguson

Brian E. Ferguson is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the international law firm McDermott, Will & Emery. He specializes in intellectual property litigation and counseling.

Comments (4) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Joe 12/26/03 06:25:53 AM EST

This is an excellent article, congratulations.

Something I would add is that if SCO is to follow copyright laws, it should have tried to mitigate damages by those it claims are infringing its copyrights (which are not their copyrights since Novell is contesting this). SCO has denied Linux developers their right to see where they are purportedly infringing on SCO's "intellectual property".

Another point is the confusion that SCO spokespeople are generating by a whole lot of misleading arguments such as:

- Claim of ownership of UNIX when SCO doesn’t even own the UNIX trademark (the Open Group owns this trademark).
- Claiming to be the same company that bought the UNIX licensing business from Novell, while they are not. The current SCO bought assets (including UNIX licensing business and SCO trademark) from original SCO (Santa Cruz Operations) a couple of years ago, and then changed its name from “Caldera” to “The SCO Group” when started with its litigation against IBM.
- A whole lot more of misleading and false statements…

Best

Rudisaurus 12/01/03 06:18:54 AM EST

"Nonetheless, there are very few certainties in litigation, as IBM and Red Hat well know. If SCO mounts enough of an attack to sustain the cases towards trial, the risks may be too great for IBM and Red Hat to continue, and settlement is possible. If that occurs, the rest of the industry best be prepared to open its checkbook."

Are you seriously attempting to suggest that IBM and Red Hat cannot afford for this matter to reach the trial stage, Brian? That is patent nonsense, as you (should) well know. It has been clearly established over the past 8 months or so (ref. groklaw.net) that the one party which cannot afford for this matter to actually reach the courts themselves is SCO, and that the party which continues to sow fear, uncertainty, and doubt about Linux and the GPL far and wide while failing to provide any trace of relevance or shred of credible evidence of copyright infringement or contract breach is that same group of litigious miscreants.

What a pity they didn't choose to devote the amounts of energy and resources they've squandered on this sordid matter to actually improving their so-called IP instead.

Fuzzy 11/30/03 09:49:44 PM EST

Why would IBM or RedHat or that matter any company relying on Linux as it's core business strategy settle ?

As I understand it (and from what I see) IBM had not only spent a LOT of money on marketing and developing Linux but have shifted their whole business strategy on it.

RedHat is a purely Linux business. That's all they do... why would they settle ?

Also, RedHat, from what I understand, have not countersued SCO regarding copyright or patent infringment but rather that SCO is damaging potential business by using scare tactics without providing proof (ie. Attempting to charge $699 for a linux licence without proving that there has been infringment). Their case is to simply have SCO either prove that there has been infringment and show what it is (without an NDA) or to shut-up.

Chuck Talk 10/16/03 08:49:34 PM EDT

I still would never open my checkbook to SCO Group. I would simply throw them out. Anything they do means their ultimate demise as a company, because I would simply move toward HURD or BSD and tell them to go and self-procreate.

That is all that anyone needs to know.

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...
Cell networks have the advantage of long-range communications, reaching an estimated 90% of the world. But cell networks such as 2G, 3G and LTE consume lots of power and were designed for connecting people. They are not optimized for low- or battery-powered devices or for IoT applications with infrequently transmitted data. Cell IoT modules that support narrow-band IoT and 4G cell networks will enable cell connectivity, device management, and app enablement for low-power wide-area network IoT. B...
The hierarchical architecture that distributes "compute" within the network specially at the edge can enable new services by harnessing emerging technologies. But Edge-Compute comes at increased cost that needs to be managed and potentially augmented by creative architecture solutions as there will always a catching-up with the capacity demands. Processing power in smartphones has enhanced YoY and there is increasingly spare compute capacity that can be potentially pooled. Uber has successfully ...
SYS-CON Events announced today that CrowdReviews.com has been named “Media Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 22nd International Cloud Expo, which will take place on June 5–7, 2018, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY. CrowdReviews.com is a transparent online platform for determining which products and services are the best based on the opinion of the crowd. The crowd consists of Internet users that have experienced products and services first-hand and have an interest in letting other potential buye...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...