Welcome!

Linux Containers Authors: Zakia Bouachraoui, Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

SCO's IP Gamble

Looking at the challenges from a legal point of view

Anyone reading this is likely aware of The SCO Group's claim to intellectual property (IP) rights in the Linux kernel. SCO hired legal guru David Boies (who prosecuted the government's case against Microsoft) and initiated a two-pronged litigation and marketing attack.

To recap: in March 2003 SCO sued IBM for breach of its software agreements with SCO, misappropriation of SCO's trade secrets in Unix, and wrongful dissemination of those trade secrets via IBM's contributions to open source and Linux. In May, SCO wrote to 1,500 of the world's largest companies, asserting that Linux infringes SCO's IP rights and that end users may face legal liability from the use of Linux. In July, SCO registered for copyrights in its Unix-based systems, and in August announced the availability of a $699 per CPU system "license" for Linux end users "to cure the SCO IP infringement issues for Linux operating systems." And SCO has engaged in an aggressive press campaign, repeatedly asserting that Linux software developers violated SCO's Unix IP rights.

It's no secret that SCO is banking heavily on its IP strategy to achieve profitability after years of multiple million-dollar losses. SCO acknowledged that licensing income would be used in part to "continue our intellectual property protection and licensing initiative," i.e., funding its legal battles with IBM and others such as Red Hat, who initiated a lawsuit against SCO in August in an effort to clear the SCO-created cloud from Red Hat Linux. The plan has worked so far, as SCO's Q3-FY2003 results show positive net income (due primarily to $7.3 million in licensing revenue) and its stock price has risen eightfold since March.

While the open source community fumes, SCO's IP strategy is far from new. As an industry matures, it becomes a target for IP holders. The semiconductor industry saw an explosion of patent litigation in the 1980s, as companies jockeyed for market share and used their IP to protect that share and generate revenue. Texas Instruments, for example, reported patent licensing revenue of $521 million in 1993, primarily from its semiconductorrelated patents; this was more income than TI made from selling semiconductor products. IBM itself is no stranger to the IP game, reportedly realizing $1.7 billion in patent royalties in 2001. And well-known organizations such as the Lemelson Foundation and Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing do not make or sell products at all, but generate billions of dollars in revenue from patent litigation and licensing.

SCO's effort to emulate these companies, however, is a long shot at best. SCO's asserted IP rights are limited to copyright and trade secrets, whereas successful licensors historically rely on patent rights. The differences are significant. One key distinction is that patent infringement is a strictliability claim; a company so charged cannot rely on the fact that it independently designed the infringing technology. In contrast, copyright and trade secret claims are both subject to the defense of independent creation. Another difference is that welldrafted patents may provide very broad protection over a particular invention, for example, by covering all methods of producing a product or achieving a specific result. Source code copyright claims, however, require more than showing that the offending code achieves the same result as the copyrighted code – there must be evidence that the offending code was copied, at least in part, from the copyrighted code.

These differences mean that IBM and Red Hat may defeat SCO's copyright and trade secret claims by showing they independently wrote the Linux code in question. Further, trade secret claims may also be defeated by showing the "secret" was not properly maintained or was subject to discovery through reverseengineering. This latter point is particularly relevant, as SCO openly marketed UnitedLinux 1.0, and therefore arguably disclosed the very trade secrets (presumably, Unix functionality – SCO has been vague on this point) it now seeks to protect.

SCO faces other challenges. In a countersuit, IBM claimed that SCO's distribution of UnitedLinux was subject to the terms of the General Public License (GPL), and that SCO's attempt to collect licensing fees violates those terms. IBM also sued SCO for patent infringement, asserting four patents against a broad array of SCO products.

Without its own patent claims, the deck is stacked against SCO, and if IBM and/or Red Hat succeeds on the merits, SCO's IP claims against others will be toothless. Nonetheless, there are very few certainties in litigation, as IBM and Red Hat well know. If SCO mounts enough of an attack to sustain the cases towards trial, the risks may be too great for IBM and Red Hat to continue, and settlement is possible. If that occurs, the rest of the industry best be prepared to open its checkbook. And while SCO may be the first to attack the open source community, history shows others will follow. As the popularity of Linux grows, the suppliers of Linux operating systems (i.e., those that generate revenue from Linux product sales) inevitably become a more inviting target for IP holders worldwide.

More Stories By Brian Ferguson

Brian E. Ferguson is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of the international law firm McDermott, Will & Emery. He specializes in intellectual property litigation and counseling.

Comments (4)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


IoT & Smart Cities Stories
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
Nicolas Fierro is CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions. He is a programmer, technologist, and operations dev who has worked with Ethereum and blockchain since 2014. His knowledge in blockchain dates to when he performed dev ops services to the Ethereum Foundation as one the privileged few developers to work with the original core team in Switzerland.
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
Whenever a new technology hits the high points of hype, everyone starts talking about it like it will solve all their business problems. Blockchain is one of those technologies. According to Gartner's latest report on the hype cycle of emerging technologies, blockchain has just passed the peak of their hype cycle curve. If you read the news articles about it, one would think it has taken over the technology world. No disruptive technology is without its challenges and potential impediments t...
If a machine can invent, does this mean the end of the patent system as we know it? The patent system, both in the US and Europe, allows companies to protect their inventions and helps foster innovation. However, Artificial Intelligence (AI) could be set to disrupt the patent system as we know it. This talk will examine how AI may change the patent landscape in the years to come. Furthermore, ways in which companies can best protect their AI related inventions will be examined from both a US and...
Bill Schmarzo, Tech Chair of "Big Data | Analytics" of upcoming CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO New York (November 12-13, 2018, New York City) today announced the outline and schedule of the track. "The track has been designed in experience/degree order," said Schmarzo. "So, that folks who attend the entire track can leave the conference with some of the skills necessary to get their work done when they get back to their offices. It actually ties back to some work that I'm doing at the University of San...
When talking IoT we often focus on the devices, the sensors, the hardware itself. The new smart appliances, the new smart or self-driving cars (which are amalgamations of many ‘things'). When we are looking at the world of IoT, we should take a step back, look at the big picture. What value are these devices providing. IoT is not about the devices, its about the data consumed and generated. The devices are tools, mechanisms, conduits. This paper discusses the considerations when dealing with the...
Bill Schmarzo, author of "Big Data: Understanding How Data Powers Big Business" and "Big Data MBA: Driving Business Strategies with Data Science," is responsible for setting the strategy and defining the Big Data service offerings and capabilities for EMC Global Services Big Data Practice. As the CTO for the Big Data Practice, he is responsible for working with organizations to help them identify where and how to start their big data journeys. He's written several white papers, is an avid blogge...