Linux Containers Authors: Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Pat Romanski, Stackify Blog

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

Lawrence Lessig on the Latest "Clueless" SCO Letter

"if you want a clue of just how clueless this case is, consider the constitutional arguments made by SCO."

Stanford Law Professor Lawrence Lessig has just blogged a follow-up to Eben Moglen's comments dismissing SCO latest 'Open Letter on Copyrights'.

Here is what Lessig writes:

From the start of this pathetic lawsuit, Eben Moglen of the Free Software Foundation has argued that there was nothing behind the SCO claims. His arguments are persuasive. But if you want a clue of just how clueless this case is, consider the constitutional arguments made by SCO.

McBride's argument is grounded in the Constitution. (Well, close to the constitution. He quotes the text of the constitution to be:

Congress shall have Power [t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, open-source advocates argue against copyright and patent laws, and whatever measures they take to by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

Actually, the framers didn't say anything about "open source advocates.")

As he rightly is argues, the Constitution requires that Congress only grant copyrights where those copyrights "promote the Progress of Science." Thus, if Congress granted copyrights in a context where they didn't "promote progress" one might well ask whether such a law was constitutional (e.g., a law that extended the terms of existing copyrights, but let's leave that aside for the moment).

But the key move in the McBride-FUD is his claim that proponents of free software and open source software are somehow against copyright.

He claims that "GPL is exactly opposite in its effect from the 'copyright' laws adopted by the US Congress and the European Union"; that "Red Hat has aggressively lobbied Congress to eliminate software patents and copyrights"; that "the issue is clear: do you support copyrights and ownership of intellectual property as envisioned by our elected officials in Congress and the European Union, or do you support "free" - as in free from ownership - intellectual property envisioned by the Free Software Foundation, Red Hat and others?"; that "SCO argues that the authority of Congress under the U.S. Constitution to "promote the Progress of Science and the useful arts" inherently includes a profit motive, and that protection for this profit motive includes a Constitutional dimension"; and that "We believe that the "progress of science" is best advanced by vigorously protecting the right of authors and inventors to earn a profit from their work."

Let's take each of these claims in turn:

"GPL is exactly opposite in its effect from the 'copyright' laws adopted by the US Congress and the European Union"

Despite RMS's aversion to the term, the GPL trades on a property right that the laws of the US and EU grant "authors" for their creative work. A property right means that the owner of the right has the right to do with his property whatever he wishes, consistent with the laws of the land. If he chooses to give his property away, that does not make it any less a property right. If he chooses to sell it for $1,000,000, that doesn't make it any less a property right. And if he chooses to license it on the condition that source code be made free, that doesn't make it any less a property right.

The laws of the US and the EU don't purport to restrict the conditions under which the owner of a copyright in software might license his software (except in ways that are not relevant to this debate). Under those laws, the owner of this property right has the right to sell his property, or license his property, or lock his property in a drawer. Again, it is his property, and he gets to do with it as he wishes.

The GPL thus precisely advances the "effect" of Congress's and the EU's copyright laws: it gives the owner of a property right the right to do with his property what he wants.

"Red Hat has aggressively lobbied Congress to eliminate software patents and copyrights See - http://www.redhat.com/legal/patent_policy.html

Well, go see just what Red Hat says in the policy statement it makes. What Red Hat (and any one sensible in this debate) argues is that software patents are bad policy and should be abolished. But no where does Red Hat argue that copyrights should be abolished.

"the issue is clear: do you support copyrights and ownership of intellectual property as envisioned by our elected officials in Congress and the European Union, or do you support 'free' - as in free from ownership - intellectual property envisioned by the Free Software Foundation, Red Hat and others?"

That's exactly right. The issue is clear: Do you support the property rights that Congress gives the creators of software -- the right to decide to (1) sell your software, (2) license your software, or (3) give your software away. If you really do support that right, then you should support the particular choices property rights owners make with that right.

Again, the owners of Free Software, like owners of Microsoft software, choose option (2). They choose to license their property. They don't sell it, or simply give it away. The terms under which they license it are, of course, different -- they require openness; Microsoft requires money (mostly). But still, both get to "require" something because both are relying upon the property right that Congress has given them.

"SCO argues that the authority of Congress under the U.S. Constitution to "promote the Progress of Science and the useful arts" inherently includes a profit motive, and that protection for this profit motive includes a Constitutional dimension"

This is the most interesting (and silly) claim made in the whole of McBride's piece. There is absolutely no authority in any Supreme Court case anywhere to say that a copyright owner must sell his copyrighted material. If JD Salinger writes a novel that he doesn't want to be published, copyright law gives him the right to put the novel in a drawer, and never sell it at all. Indeed, the law would punish anyone who stole the book and published it without his permission -- even if the "motive" of the thief was "profit."

This again follows from the nature of a property right -- it is the right of the owner to decide what to do with his resources. Does Bill Gates violate the constitution when, instead of devoting $20b of his own money to making more "profit," he decides instead to use the money to save millions of lives in Africa?

It is therefore perfectly permissible for the owner of a copyright to do nothing with it. And it would be perfectly permissible for the owner of a copyright to give it away -- to dedicate it to the public domain. (And if you'd like to do that, Creative Commons will help). But again, GPL'd software is not dedicated to the public domain.

McBride, however, goes even further than claiming that there's some constitutional problem with giving IP away (deciding not to take advantage of the "profit motive.") The implication of his argument is that somehow the framers of the constitution were mandating that the only laws that Congress could pass would be laws that protected copyright owners who purported to sell their creative work. That unless the owner follows "the profit motive," the right is, in some sense, illegitimate.

Well, first, and again, there are plenty of companies that are developing and releasing GPL'd software because of the profit motive. IBM/HP/etc. have adopted this model for developing software because they believe it will make them more money than any other. They don't adopt it exclusively; they don't adopt it for all kinds of software; but they adopt it where it serves their profit motive, and so, even under McBride's test, there should be no problem with GPL'd software for them.

But more fundamentally, where is there any legal authority anywhere for the claim that the only constitutional way a copyright might be granted is if it is granted to people who choose to sell or license for money the work they have created? Answer: No where. There is no such authority, anywhere. It is, like most of the SCO suit, simply made up.

• "We believe that the "progress of science" is best advanced by vigorously protecting the right of authors and inventors to earn a profit from their work."

We should all believe that the "progress of science" is best advanced when "Authors" have the right to do with their property whatever it is they want to do -- consistent with the law, and so long as the property right is properly balanced. And we should all believe that the "progress of science" is best advanced when that right is "vigorously protect[ed]".

But the owners of GPL'd software are doing no more than exercising this right, just as Microsoft would exercise its right. They are profiting from the right to choose the terms under which they release their software, and the terms they have chosen also have a great benefit to other software innovation. They exercise their property right; they and we benefit.

But if we are to protect that property right "vigorously," then we should take steps to protect property owners from baseless lawsuits against their right to use their property as they wish. So when it comes to the matter of sanctions against the lawyers in this case, the judge might well want to consider how important it is that the property right of copyright owners be "vigorously" defended.


Finally, notice what McBride doesn't say. He does not say that the GPL is unconstitutional. To say that, he would have to say that Congress doesn't have the power to create a copyright that gives authors the right to license their software in the way the GPL does. To say that, he'd have to believe that Congress's decision about how best to grant copyrights was subject to strong judicial review. To say that, he'd have to believe Eldred was wrongly decided. But instead, he seems to like Eldred just fine.

Instead, the most he can be understood to have said here is that the property right of copyright should be defended. I know of no one in the FSF, or Free Software movement generally, who doesn't believe that. Copyrights, properly defined, like any property right, properly defined, should be defended; and the right of authors to make their work available under a license such as the GPL is just one more example of how property rights ought properly to be defended.

The SCO case has been dragging through the courts for months now. McBride threatens another 18 months before he gets to trial. But if this is all they've got, then again, Eben had it right at the start. This is nothing more than a failed company using a failed legal system to make money rather than producing great software. Don't tell me this is what the Framers had in mind when they drafted the Progress Clause of our Constitution.

Updated: thanks to Richard Morin and John Riedl for corrections; and added the following: Many have written to correct my statement that McBride "doesn't say" that the GPL is unconstitutional. I didn't mean that. I meant he doesn't make the argument. The claim that the GPL was unconstitutional was what got me to respond in the first place. But the letter merely asserts that absurd claim; it doesn't (and couldn't) defend it. Sorry for the mistake and thanks for the corrections.

 [Lawrence Lessig is Professor of Law at Stanford Law School and Founder of the Stanford Center for Internet and Society. His books include The Future of Ideas and Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. He is also Chair of the Creative Commons project.]

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

More Stories By Jeremy Geelan

Jeremy Geelan is Chairman & CEO of the 21st Century Internet Group, Inc. and an Executive Academy Member of the International Academy of Digital Arts & Sciences. Formerly he was President & COO at Cloud Expo, Inc. and Conference Chair of the worldwide Cloud Expo series. He appears regularly at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences across six continents. You can follow him on twitter: @jg21.

Comments (17) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

Most Recent Comments
Ahron Darnell 03/01/05 11:41:10 PM EST

simple SCO was being paid by MS

Shan 12/06/03 11:30:58 AM EST

One wonders how McBride views the move Microsoft made when it offered its IE browser for 'free', scuttling some of Netscape's plans for expansion? Then the team that wrote the browser code on which IE is based entered into an license agreement - correct me if I'm wrong - wherein Microsoft agreed to pay a royalty, which would have been way out of character for Microsoft. As things turned out, the team received virtually NIL due to the fact that there was nothing in the agreement about giving the software away. Lots of people were SB&T in that little bit of business derringdo.

Wesley Parish 12/06/03 05:33:42 AM EST

Mind if I point Lessing et alii, to a web site detailing an interesting incident in a beautiful country?

Rituale und Emotionen der Ngaing in Papua Neuguinea / Rituals and Emotions of the Ngaing in Papua New Guinea
Guido Sprenger, M.A.
Institut für Ethnologie, Universität Münster

What I found interesting about a book so referenced, Peter Lawrence's "Road Belong Cargo", having read it in 1999, is the fact that "cargo cults" grew out of the "Intellectual Property" laws of the Papua New Guineans.

They had rituals to get the nature spirits and ancestral spirits to get their gardens to grow. They changed them periodically, and they traded in them. These rituals belonged to the people who made them - anyone else using them without clearing it first with the original owners, was in big, big trouble.

The "Europeans" had goods and prosperity and power. Obviously they had stronger rituals. But they came and used the Papua New Guineans' land without making trade of those rituals. Ergo the cargo cults, which attempted to take back that power, that prosperity, those goods.

I spent a Christmas in Vanimo, shortly after the local people had tried to get their cargo by overturning an impressively big surveying marker. I'm finding a certain amount of deja vu reading this tripe that the SCO Group churns out.

As far as I can see, there is this company that hasn't understood how to make it good with F/LOSS and stay on the good side of the community. They have noticed that the software is very good, and that it is growing at an impressive rate. They not unnaturally want some of the action. So they decide they'll overturn a surveying marker because their Great Leader decides they will.

Chaos. Everybody else decides their great leader is a dork who deserves time behind bars. Meanwhile, they go on using the rites of another group without having cleared it with them ... and taking whatever they can, without giving anything back.

Plasmo. D. Iosis 12/05/03 04:22:00 PM EST

Suppose a group of people formed a commune, membership qualifications involved having two digits on each hand, so you gave up your fingers to belong to this exclusive society. You then adopt the binary number system as your numerical system for your math, and all day to activities.
You then adopt or convert all science related to 2 digits.
You abbrogate the boolean logic to yourself as being solely yours because it applies to members of your commune.
You then go and sue the whole computing industry as having stole your intellectual property and ask for royalty on everything that involves a binary function.
This is an absurd as the inventors of the wheel claiming royalty on everything that has a wheel in it or resembles a wheel.
Ah! Greed! Motivates people to reap where they did not sow.
Incidentally, It was my people that invented the wheel.
while we are there can we ask the Romans and the Greeks to pay us a royalty for every wheel used in creating and expanding their Empire.
Quo Vadis SCO

Dennis McClain-Furmanski 12/05/03 03:44:20 PM EST

The sheer audacity and utter irrationality of SCO's words and actions have forced me to take a professional attitude towards their behavior. I'm a psychologist.

If an individual were to behave in such an irrational manner, making outlandish claims without support, and then attempting to construct support from bits and pieces of information taken out of context, appending self-supporting information which does not appear elsewhere, as though it were part of the original, this person would be determined to have a problem relating to reality. In short, if a person acted like SCO, they'd earn themselves some sort of diagnosis. They would be evaluated as to whether they are a danger to themselves or others, and if so, steps taken to protect and care for them.

The law treats a corporation as a sort of artificial individual. Professionally, I would seriously consider treating this "individual" with medication. In my opinion, there is something seriously wrong here, well beyond any realm of doing business.

Bill Vandenberg 12/05/03 03:32:28 PM EST

I am delighted with Lindows (Linux) as it develops replacing most if not all MS has to offer.
I also suspect some other company then SCO is footing the bill for this useless interference with linux GPL in general. My thanks to Professor Lessig.

John B 12/05/03 03:29:28 PM EST

Lessig is a God! He is so intimate with the subject of IP. My fear every night is that people who have one sided interests in IP, or the lack of his understanding are making decisions that slowly degrade rights we were given to begin with (as authors, and consumers). I'm glad he is so open and accurate in explaining the law, and he is the most articulate writer on the subject. I only hope that the public will take interest in what he teaches before their destinies are dictated to them by industry. It is important to protect the profit motive but imagine the advancements that could be made if everything were freely available for you to consume or innovate in any manner chosen or made out of necessity. Now that's progress.
I know it's a weak point but also remember, when you buy some Beatles songs, not a penny goes to Paul, Ringo, John, or George, or families, it goes to Michael Jackson. A departure from protecting the interests of authors and inventors.

Thomas Frayne 12/05/03 03:29:27 PM EST

SCO's PR statements vs court statements:

At the court hearing today, the judge granted IBM's two motions to compel, gave SCO thirty days to comply 'with specificity' and suspended further discovery. Did not rule on the SCO motion until next hearing scheduled for Friday, Jan 23 and 10:00 am.

SCO did say that they will be filing a complaint within days on copyright violations.

For 6 months, SCO has been stalling in court. They have not specified a single line of code that they claim is their IP. Meanwhile, they constantly proclaim in their PR that they are eager to place their evidence in court.

Shivarajan Varadarajan 12/05/03 03:15:08 PM EST

Its very heartining to know, that some companies in the topare so scared of getting BEATEN-UP in the marlet that, they try & tend to play pure/open and NASTY politics with Money. The real culprit MS .... who is aiding and abetting all this should be FRYED by dederal authorities for unjustified MONOPOLY+FOUL PLAY.

We should shun using product of any company (LOL not many) if they rather then developing their products better, tend to dissolve and break such NOBLE community efforts thro' false and creepy means -: FUNDING LAW SUITS.

Nicholas Bodley 12/05/03 03:12:13 PM EST

I'm very glad someone like Lawrence Lessig has clarified the FUD so capably. SCO is a terminally-sick joke; shame; they were once respected. It would be quite amusing if they were found to be hiding something like a mini-WorldCom (loosely speaking). I won't speculate on McBride's degree of emotional maturity.

Chris Rogers 12/05/03 03:03:56 PM EST

The SCO letter also states:
" Congress adopted the DMCA in recognition of the risk to the American economy that digital technology could easily be pirated and that without protection, American companies would unfairly lose technology advantages to companies in other countries through piracy, as had happened in the 1970's."

This would seem to imply that they believe the DMCA was put into place to protect American businesses from "companies in other countries". This is a rediculous and arrogant comment to make, since US laws have absolutely no effect in other countries.

drhall 12/05/03 02:43:11 PM EST

How hard can this debate be? Either SCO has claim to "show how" or "know how" patent infringements, or they don't. Nothing exhibited either way so far. What a waste of money ... maybe SCO is using this as a publicity/marketing write-off? I have watched in amazement at the money being thrown toward this "argument" ball of twine.
My best guess is SCO was facing disaster is one form or another and opted to create this as a smokescreen for a major problem or failure of some kind.

don hall
bear creek research

michelmartin 12/05/03 02:09:47 PM EST

It's funny how SCO claims one thing, and at the same time they take advantange of Samba (SMB)or their site runs on Apache as you can see following this link:

Maxei 12/05/03 02:00:34 PM EST

Well said. I just want to attract attention to the fact that the Advancement of Science has been possible due to a simmilar movement to that of GPL: All knowledge is available to everyone. We see it when we go to school, where we learn all kinds of subjects. If science was totally private, we would not have the kind of society we live in, actually.

Matt Simpson 12/05/03 01:58:59 PM EST

Ok, so I come to this Linuxworld site to read an article about Linux, and all I see is advertisments for Windows software confronting me? What's the deal?

I don't care it is "Unix Services for Windows" it still is dumb Windows ad. Why are you doing ANYTHING to promote ANY Microsoft product?

BajaBob 12/05/03 01:50:01 PM EST

I have worked with Don Donner in Washington, D.C., past president of the Patent Lawyers Association, applying for and obtaining patents on my own inventions. I have seen first hand how the patent and copyright internals work.

One of the other aspects of this suit is the right to obtain damages from SCO for interferring with commerce. Many major cases of IP damage due to fraud, market interference, etc. have ended up before the Supreme Court.

When most of SCO's claims are found frivilous (does not require all), the courts can ascertain that unlike the UC Berkeley BSD case there was a blatant attempt to extort monies from the Linux Community at large and award damages to all Linux users, resellers, hardware manufacturers, and other damaged parties just as in the Microsoft software suit.

I have already sent in my form for damages against Microsoft and can't wait to send in my form against SCO. I hope they have verrrry deep pockets.

steven 12/05/03 01:48:16 PM EST

This article is right on target. It shows the problems with the SCO lawsuit and explains them in clear English. Lessig is right. Hopefully, for the sake of our freedoms, the courts will agree.

@ThingsExpo Stories
Business professionals no longer wonder if they'll migrate to the cloud; it's now a matter of when. The cloud environment has proved to be a major force in transitioning to an agile business model that enables quick decisions and fast implementation that solidify customer relationships. And when the cloud is combined with the power of cognitive computing, it drives innovation and transformation that achieves astounding competitive advantage.
The Founder of NostaLab and a member of the Google Health Advisory Board, John is a unique combination of strategic thinker, marketer and entrepreneur. His career was built on the "science of advertising" combining strategy, creativity and marketing for industry-leading results. Combined with his ability to communicate complicated scientific concepts in a way that consumers and scientists alike can appreciate, John is a sought-after speaker for conferences on the forefront of healthcare science,...
Data is the fuel that drives the machine learning algorithmic engines and ultimately provides the business value. In his session at Cloud Expo, Ed Featherston, a director and senior enterprise architect at Collaborative Consulting, discussed the key considerations around quality, volume, timeliness, and pedigree that must be dealt with in order to properly fuel that engine.
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Red Hat's Chief Archi...
The current age of digital transformation means that IT organizations must adapt their toolset to cover all digital experiences, beyond just the end users’. Today’s businesses can no longer focus solely on the digital interactions they manage with employees or customers; they must now contend with non-traditional factors. Whether it's the power of brand to make or break a company, the need to monitor across all locations 24/7, or the ability to proactively resolve issues, companies must adapt to...
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settl...
Organizations planning enterprise data center consolidation and modernization projects are faced with a challenging, costly reality. Requirements to deploy modern, cloud-native applications simultaneously with traditional client/server applications are almost impossible to achieve with hardware-centric enterprise infrastructure. Compute and network infrastructure are fast moving down a software-defined path, but storage has been a laggard. Until now.
In his general session at 19th Cloud Expo, Manish Dixit, VP of Product and Engineering at Dice, discussed how Dice leverages data insights and tools to help both tech professionals and recruiters better understand how skills relate to each other and which skills are in high demand using interactive visualizations and salary indicator tools to maximize earning potential. Manish Dixit is VP of Product and Engineering at Dice. As the leader of the Product, Engineering and Data Sciences team at D...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that the upcoming DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO New York event will feature 10 companies from Poland to participate at the "Poland Digital Transformation Pavilion" on November 12-13, 2018.
Digital Transformation is much more than a buzzword. The radical shift to digital mechanisms for almost every process is evident across all industries and verticals. This is often especially true in financial services, where the legacy environment is many times unable to keep up with the rapidly shifting demands of the consumer. The constant pressure to provide complete, omnichannel delivery of customer-facing solutions to meet both regulatory and customer demands is putting enormous pressure on...
The best way to leverage your CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO presence as a sponsor and exhibitor is to plan your news announcements around our events. The press covering CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO will have access to these releases and will amplify your news announcements. More than two dozen Cloud companies either set deals at our shows or have announced their mergers and acquisitions at CloudEXPO. Product announcements during our show provide your company with the most reach through our targeted audienc...
JETRO showcased Japan Digital Transformation Pavilion at SYS-CON's 21st International Cloud Expo® at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA. The Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) is a non-profit organization that provides business support services to companies expanding to Japan. With the support of JETRO's dedicated staff, clients can incorporate their business; receive visa, immigration, and HR support; find dedicated office space; identify local government subsidies; get...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that All in Mobile, a mobile app development company from Poland, will exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO. All In Mobile is a mobile app development company from Poland. Since 2014, they maintain passion for developing mobile applications for enterprises and startups worldwide.
@DevOpsSummit at Cloud Expo, taking place November 12-13 in New York City, NY, is co-located with 22nd international CloudEXPO | first international DXWorldEXPO and will feature technical sessions from a rock star conference faculty and the leading industry players in the world.
"Akvelon is a software development company and we also provide consultancy services to folks who are looking to scale or accelerate their engineering roadmaps," explained Jeremiah Mothersell, Marketing Manager at Akvelon, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
As data explodes in quantity, importance and from new sources, the need for managing and protecting data residing across physical, virtual, and cloud environments grow with it. Managing data includes protecting it, indexing and classifying it for true, long-term management, compliance and E-Discovery. Commvault can ensure this with a single pane of glass solution – whether in a private cloud, a Service Provider delivered public cloud or a hybrid cloud environment – across the heterogeneous enter...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that ICC-USA, a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances, will exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO | DXWorldEXPO. DXWordEXPO New York 2018, colocated with CloudEXPO New York 2018 will be held November 11-13, 2018, in New York City. ICC is a computer systems integrator and server manufacturing company focused on developing products and product appliances to meet a wide range of ...
More and more brands have jumped on the IoT bandwagon. We have an excess of wearables – activity trackers, smartwatches, smart glasses and sneakers, and more that track seemingly endless datapoints. However, most consumers have no idea what “IoT” means. Creating more wearables that track data shouldn't be the aim of brands; delivering meaningful, tangible relevance to their users should be. We're in a period in which the IoT pendulum is still swinging. Initially, it swung toward "smart for smart...
Headquartered in Plainsboro, NJ, Synametrics Technologies has provided IT professionals and computer systems developers since 1997. Based on the success of their initial product offerings (WinSQL and DeltaCopy), the company continues to create and hone innovative products that help its customers get more from their computer applications, databases and infrastructure. To date, over one million users around the world have chosen Synametrics solutions to help power their accelerated business or per...
Dion Hinchcliffe is an internationally recognized digital expert, bestselling book author, frequent keynote speaker, analyst, futurist, and transformation expert based in Washington, DC. He is currently Chief Strategy Officer at the industry-leading digital strategy and online community solutions firm, 7Summits.