Welcome!

Linux Authors: Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White, Hovhannes Avoyan, Yeshim Deniz, Roger Strukhoff

Related Topics: Linux

Linux: Article

Linus Declares "GPL is No Hippie Dream"

"As always, [Darl McBride] gets fundamental facts wrong," Torvalds writes.

In a piece just released via the IDG News service, Torvalds writes, in his characteristic robust style:

"I was recently sent a copy of SCO CEO Darl McBride's Open Letter on copyright law. As usual, Mr. McBride portrays the Linux community as the enemy of copyright. As always, he gets fundamental facts wrong.

Their argument about copyright law is totally specious, and fails any sensible test. They claim that the U.S. Congress' authority under the U.S. Constitution to "promote the Progress of Science and the useful arts" inherently includes a profit motive.

This is an obvious misrepresentation of facts. It's akin to saying that public universities are fundamentally unconstitutional, since they "promote the Progress of Science" yet they aren't motivated by profit.

There is nothing unconstitutional in not being motivated by money alone, although clearly money -- rather than sense, law or anything else -- is what motivates Darl McBride.

Recently, we had an unrelated copyright discussion on the Linux kernel discussion list (some people still want to have binary only modules and try to argue that the GPL doesn't ever cover them).

Anyway, that's beside the point, though it does show that some people want to take advantage of open source without giving anything back. But after the discussion, I ended up looking up the exact wording of the U.S. copyright law and guess what I found:

"The term 'financial gain' includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works."

This is from U.S. Code Collection, Title 17 (copyrights), Chapter 1, Section 101: "Definitions." In short, this is from the very first section in copyright law -- the section that defines terms even before those terms are used. This is some pretty fundamental stuff when it comes to copyrights in the U.S.

Pertinent, if you will.

And note how copyright law expressly includes "the expectation of receipt" of anything of value, and expressly mentions "receipt of other copyrighted works" as such a thing of value. And that's the very definition of "financial gain," as far as U.S. copyright law is concerned.

Now guess what the GPL is all about?

Maybe someone can explain to Darl that the GPL is designed so that people receive the value of other peoples copyrighted works in return for having made their own contributions. That is the fundamental idea of the whole license -- everything else is just legal fluff.

So not only is Darl wrong when he attacks the GPL as being somehow against "financial gain;" the notion that the GPL has, of "exchange of receipt of copyrighted works," is actually explicitly encoded in U.S. copyright law. It's not just a crazy idea that some lefty Commie hippie dreamed up in a drug-induced stupor.

So if Darl calls that notion unconstitutional, he is actually attacking the U.S. code as it stands today.

If you want to check that legal quote yourself, this is the place to go."

 

For more international news from IDG News Service, visit IDGnews.net.
Story copyright 2003 IDG News Service. All rights reserved.

Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
Linuxworld © is the registered trademark of IDG. SYS-CON is using the Mark pursuant to a license agreement from IDG

More Stories By Linus Torvalds

Probably the best-known programmer in the world today, Linus Torvalds is also the world's best-known Finn. He is the creator of Linux computer operating system.

Comments (1) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Warren Crossing 12/10/03 05:45:14 PM EST

although drug toting commie hippies are funny at parties and cut out screeds and screeds of code through the middle of the dark cold night they have actually pressed on a valid economic model.

the expectation of exchange is the fundamental driving motive of business called going concern, its present in everyday business and its the way companies do deals, for goods and services. it precludes barter, engagement and ends up as revenue,assets and investments.

its when individuals reserve a part of the "value" for their selfish motive of conspicious consumption that the total system becomes poorer. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=exploitation

look at the IP involved in producing something like mplayer http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/projects.html
and the blacklisted companies that don't contribute. what a bummer for the guys that poured their souls into mplayer.

i think the GPL is a first step in a larger public domain strategy that could incorporate & extend todays normal service and logistics industries. perhaps humanity will adopt a more proportional and contribution-focused method of living on this planet.

ps why would i want unux services on windows - why wouldn't i just install linux?