Welcome!

Linux Authors: RealWire News Distribution, Colin Walker, Lori MacVittie, Unitiv Blog, Adrian Bridgwater

Related Topics: Linux

Linux: Article

Linux in the News - Friday

Linux in the News - Friday

In 2004, "Microsoft's prices have only one way to go: down"

"With OpenOffice and Linux bringing serious competition back to the desktop for the first time in almost a decade, Microsoft's prices have only one way to go: down. Redmond's decision to pursue other revenue sources - patents - is as the Free Software 'Foundation's counsel Eben Moglen said ... simply the start of Plan B: 'Microsoft executives are aware they have crossed a maturity threshold - they can't grow as quickly as they have before; and even blockbluster products won't change this dramatically,' he observed."

Andrew Orlowski, writing in The Register, December 31, 2004



"Longhorn will never ship, but Microsoft Linux will."

"New Year's prediction: Longhorn will never ship, but Microsoft Linux will. Even if I'm wrong, it's clear that software development is headed for a new place, and the end game that most observers saw even five years ago -- that MS would win it all -- doesn't seem as likely on the eve of 2004. That said, Microsoft isn't going to go away, in this author's opinion."

Chris Gulker, writing at software.itmanagersjournal.com, January 1, 2004 



"There's also a nice David/Goliath aspect to Linux vs. Windows competition"

"The big action on the IT news front in 2004 will be Linux and open source. The software may only be incrementally better than it was a year ago, but "China Chooses One Million Sun Linux Desktops" is news, if only because of the big number. There's also a nice David/Goliath aspect to Linux vs. Windows competition that attracts journalists because it makes for dramatic stories, ones where the Good Guys win and the Bad Guys lose, just like in the movies."

Robin 'Roblimo' Miller, writing at NewsForge, January 1, 2004



Linux in 2004 Predictions from Forbes editors

"The end of "free." Free didn't work for dotcom pet food stores, yet much of the rhetoric around technologies like Linux and voiceover-IP still involves this crazy notion that companies can make money by giving things away. They can't. One sign that some are recognizing that this is folly: Red Hat's move to migrate its Linux customers to a paid-for "enterprise" version of its software. Others will follow suit."

Daniel Lyons , December 23, 2003 

"The so-called software revolution sparked by Linus Torvalds is now a revolution from within that's farther-reaching than the hotly debated Linux vs. Microsoft showdown. It's a new way to develop software that's lowering costs for industry incumbents like IBM, Novell and Oracle." 

Victoria Murphy , December 23, 2003 

 

 

"Free Software Ximian Desktop" in prospect?

"In a year when its neighbor, as well as closely related, SCO Group took to attacking GNU/Linux in increasingly large barrages of legal threats and actions, Novell started formulating a serious portfolio of GNU/Linux offerings by announcing purchases of Ximian Inc., a major GNOME developer, and SuSE Linux AG, the popular GNU/Linux distribution. Assuming that SCO attempts to block the Novell-SuSE deal fail, the deal promises to unite Ximian Desktop with a much needed foundation distribution in the form of the easy-to-use SuSE Linux. We're hoping Novell might get rid of the annoying YaST License in the process, making SuSE a truly Free distribution for the Free Software Ximian Desktop."

Timothy R. Butler writing in Open for Business, December 31, 2003



Bradley Kuhn: "Proprietary software [is] bad for the world"

"Or maybe, as some suggest, the [Free Software Foundation] wants GPL-covered code to creep into commercial products so it can use GPL to force open those products. [FSF Executive Director Bradley] Kuhn says that's nuts--"pure propaganda rhetoric." But he concedes that his foundation hates the way companies like Oracle and Microsoft generate billions of dollars by selling software licenses. "We'd like people to stop selling proprietary software. It's bad for the world," Kuhn says.

So far, none of the Free Software Foundation's targets have decided it is bad for the world and gone to court. This despite the fact that the foundation has $750,000 in the bank and one lawyer who works for free, part time, when he's not teaching classes at Columbia University.

Will Cisco and Broadcom be the first? Probably they'll decide, like everyone else, that it's cheaper to settle than to fight."

Kuhn, quoted by Forbes
correspondent Daniel Lyons, 23 December 2003

 

More Stories By Linux News Desk

SYS-CON's Linux News Desk gathers stories, analysis, and information from around the Linux world and synthesizes them into an easy to digest format for IT/IS managers and other business decision-makers.

Comments (3) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Richard Rager 01/03/04 08:15:39 PM EST

Software need to stay free. Maybe we need to invent this software stuff first then transfer the Right to FSF.

Lets the Sun set and die. Sun gave 2 Million to SCO. Let cut off SCO food an kill anyone off the paid them any more ransom.

Sun must DIE and I know that I will never buy SUN's products again!

Enjoy,

Richard

John 01/02/04 10:45:18 AM EST

I think this is great for the industry but Sun is definitely going to make it big with this, not Microsoft!!!! In 3 years they will have at least 50% of the global market on Operating System software.

Dan Kegel 01/02/04 09:44:14 AM EST

That Lyons article is actually dated October or so.
news.google.com has been showing old news as new news
lately -- probably it gets fooled by minor tweaks to
the sites' banners -- so I have a funny feeling that's
how you're finding the news for this :-)