|By Jeremy Geelan||
|February 17, 2004 12:00 AM EST||
Small wonder that the Globe's piece quotes software developer Ron Newman, who after hearing McBride speak at the Harvard Law School on Feb. 2. apparently said: "I believe his unpopularity far exceeds that of Bill Gates, who is No. 2."
Newman's view isn't one shared by the Globe's reporter, though.
"In person, McBride is hardly the malevolent villain imagined by Linux boosters," writes reporter Bray, before adding: "As a child, he was the one who always sorted out sibling disputes. As a young adult, he served an LDS mission to Japan. Later, while working on a sociology degree at Brigham Young University, he volunteered to help a professor with his new personal computer."
In line with this faithful reproduction of The Story So Far from the McBride point of view, Bray then summarizes McBride's very own version of things:
"McBride became SCO's chief in 2002, after a stint at the business training company Franklin Covey of Salt Lake City. He arrived at a company whose revenues were dwindling, partly due to competition from ever-more-capable versions of Linux. In addition, McBride was disturbed by a comment from IBM software vice president Steve Mills, who said IBM hoped to replace its SCO-derived AIX software with Linux. How could Linux, little more than a hobbyist's tool a few years earlier, compare with heavy-duty Unix code? McBride began to suspect that IBM was simply donating portions of its AIX code to the Linux community, to hasten the day when Linux and Unix were functional equals — the day when SCO's business would essentially cease to exist." [italics added]
Rather than commenting on the above version of events, LinuxWorld.com will let Mr McBride speak for himself:
"I wasn't brought in to have warm fuzzies with Slashdot. I was brought in to increase [SCO's] shareholder value."
No further comment is necessary: Bill Gates must be the happiest man alive, to have been so lucky as to be blessed with a fellow CEO capable of acting as a lightning-conductor to the kind of wrath previously reserved exclusively for him.
|Fecal Extrusion 02/19/04 08:31:02 AM EST|
Darl, who the hell asked you to spew out your
When I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!
|Thomas Frayne 02/18/04 05:56:19 PM EST|
McBride vs SCOG
McBride's statements often contradict SCOG's court filings. I don't see any conflict this time, so I'll just link to a comment on Groklaw by a user who offered his name and position at AutoZone, a company that, in a discovery response, SCOG accused of stealing SCOG's copyrighted code. The accusation was based on the contention that AutoZone could not have done it themselves.
The Groklaw commentor was a Senior Technical Advisor and project leader of the project to port AutoZone's port to Linux. He said: "I personally ported all of AutoZone's internal software libraries for use under Linux. I personally developed the rules by which other AutoZone developers should make changes to their code to support both Linux and SCO's OpenServer product. ... As to the claim that SCO's shared libraries were a necessary part of the port: false. No SCO libraries were involved in the porting activity. As to the claim that IBM induced us to transition to Linux: false."
|Ex SCO User 02/18/04 11:40:45 AM EST|
Well, as Darl says, he is just out to increase shareholder value. In the good ol' days, Microsoft used to hold ... what was it? ... 40% of SCO shares. Do they still? Obviously Darl thinks so.
|Randy Poznan 02/18/04 03:21:39 AM EST|
|Fecal Extrusion 02/17/04 01:51:06 PM EST|
Willy Gates may not be the CEO, but he DOES have the absolute
(by the way... What the hell drunken monarch decided to
|Fecal Extrusion 02/17/04 01:48:10 PM EST|
As per andy1307's quote from Business Week...
I DARE Microsoft to show even 1 opened package of that UNIX
|JeR 02/17/04 01:24:38 PM EST|
Great, uhmm, summary. Only, Bill Gates isn't the CEO of Microsoft any more.
|ashishK 02/17/04 10:56:59 AM EST|
At Comdex on November 18, 1993, McBride stated that SCO would target Linux users in legal proceedings within 90 days--that gives McBride until TOMORROW to begin legal proceedings.
|andy1307 02/17/04 06:31:15 AM EST|
Since this piece mentions Microsoft, try looking at this Business Week piece:
The Most Hated Company In Tech THE MICROSOFT FACTOR
A quote from the article: "But who stands to gain the most from an SCO win? Microsoft. Linux is the primary force standing between Microsoft and domination of the computer world. The software giant is happily fanning customers' fears with an anti-Linux campaign while pumping money into SCO. Even though neither company has disclosed a dollar figure, sources close to SCO say Microsoft has spent more than $12 million on SCO licenses. Microsoft says it needs the licenses because it sells technology that allows its customers to run applications that were designed for Unix, the operating system Linux was modeled on. Critics believe it is just helping SCO finance its lawsuit."
|LinusSpeaks 02/17/04 06:25:22 AM EST|
here's Linus Torvalds at his best:
"... And even if we were to live in that alternate universe where SCO would be right, they'd still be wrong."
You gotta love that guy's way of making a point.
|Yes!! 02/17/04 06:14:29 AM EST|
Still working just fine
|Bombdisposal 02/17/04 06:13:51 AM EST|
Remember the attempt last month at starting a GoogleBombing where "litigious bastards" links to SCO? Is it still working?
|Thornae 02/17/04 06:12:26 AM EST|
Wasn't it McBride who is on record as saying: "I said my goal was to get a return on the initial Caldera IPO, when it was trading at $56 per share...."
I'm sure everyone would like their money back from the tech-bust, but there's this little thing called reality. Unless you're Darl, of course.
|SorryBut6 02/17/04 06:10:53 AM EST|
When all is said and done with this case I think Darl McBride will be making a fast exit... to South America.
Other people have said it and I agree with it... those attempted extortion, excuse me, licensing letters they sent out are should be pursued as federal mail fraud, and the SEC should take a long hard look at Mr. McBride and his lawyers, and how they're playing their own company's stock.
|anon 02/17/04 06:09:51 AM EST|
SCO can do absolutely anything they want. Lie, steal, commit slander and fraud. There are no repercussions.
The linux community, meanwhile, has to be absolutely perfect and saintlike and have not a single user do anything that could be interpreted as unethical, or they get blasted as scary anarchists.
This is even more funny when you consider SCO is a singular organization which can enforce ethical standards, whereas "the linux community" is an open ended, uncontrollable group of people that basically means everyone who downloads a certain program.
We need a media that knows how to do more than reprint press releases.
|pyellman 02/17/04 06:03:06 AM EST|
Just to put it out there -- shorting SCO is harder than you think. I've tried. I have access to 2 brokerages (USAA brokerage and Ameritrade), and neither could meet my repeated requests to short SCO. I also contacted Schwab to see if they could (to then open an account), and they also said no. The reality is, there's just not that much stock out there for the "average investor" to work with, long or short; the average volume over the last 10 days has been 177,000 on 13,850,000 shares outstanding. Do the math, that's a pretty small percentage.
For other reasons as well, I'm not a fan of the stock kiting scheme theory. I don't see how the numbers support that theory. Here is the summary stockholder information as of today: 45.83% % Held by Insiders, 30.44% Held by Institutions; within the institutional holdings, a large fraction are held by institutions who have aligned themselves with SCO through other financial arrangements. In addition, the trading records show that the rise in the stock price has been mainly due to trading between and among various insiders and institutional investors. I can't pose as an expert on schemes or grifting, but it is my understanding that any successful scam eventually needs a mark, and I just don't see who that mark is going to be in this case; that is, it seems to me that for a stock price inflation scheme to be successful, you eventually have to find buyers at the inflated price, and I haven't seen indications of the kind of demand for SCO stock that would be needed to support a big payday for insiders and institutions -- unless, of course, SCO were to win its case. Maybe there's another angle on the scheme, such as using the inflated stock price as collateral for loans or something, but if it is a stock kiting scheme there would seem to be some problems in the execution.
|ekj 02/17/04 06:02:22 AM EST|
SCO looks doomed. Even the financial people look like they're starting to get it, the stock is down over 40% from it's top valuation (allthough still sky-high over earlier levels), and the short-interest stays steadily at insane levels. (i.e. the number of people willing to be cold hard cash that SCO is, infact, bullshitting is staying steadily at record levels.)
Offcourse the nerd-population has been saying this for months. I hope there's a few kernel-contributors among the many many many people holding this stock short.
|Bojan 02/17/04 06:01:44 AM EST|
Darl is not a reasonable man. He claimed (and still does) that Linux contains millions of lines of code from System V. Discovery in the IBM case has shown zero lines of System V code provided by SCO. Instead they listed some AIX and Dynix files... He is far from reasonable.
Not to mention his blathering about GPL. One day it's valid (when it suits him), the other it isn't.
He was offered an opportunity to clear this whole thing up many times. He wouldn't take it. Now it's time for Mr Marriot and the rest of IBM to grind him, SCO and their lawyers into dust.
|zedman 02/17/04 06:00:24 AM EST|
Much as it goes against the grain, for SCO to charge a fee is not actually
On the other hand, SCO threatening end-users unless they pay up
|neoprene 02/17/04 05:58:49 AM EST|
SCOX should stop infringing on GPL, SCOX owns no Copyrights or Patents that could challenge Linux
- WebRTC Summit Silicon Valley Call for Papers Now Open
- DevOps Summit Silicon Valley Call for Papers Now Open
- Fanning the Flames of Agile
- WSO2 Guest Speakers at WSO2Con Europe 2014 Will Examine Technology Developments and Best Practices Enabling the Connected Business
- Call for Papers for Cloud Expo 2014 Silicon Valley Opens
- Docker + Stackato: The Perfect Workload Portability Solution
- An API Strategy Is a Business Strategy
- DevOps Summit Power Panel | Is DevOps Really Changing How IT Is Working?
- Cloud Infrastructure for the Real World
- What's Driving Business Technology Spending Disruption?
- Big Data Expo 2014 Silicon Valley Call for Papers Now Open
- SaaS Represents the Commoditization of Business Function
- Global Financial Firms Can Effectively Address Technology Risk Guidelines
- WebRTC Business Models: Building a Web-Based Telecom Co
- Enterprise Cloud Analytics and Business Intelligence
- More Mainstream Businesses Depend on Open Source
- AMAG, HP, ImageWare Systems, March Networks and StrikeForce Discuss Security Solutions in SecuritySolutionsWatch.com Interviews
- MapDB: The Agile Java Database
- WebRTC Summit Silicon Valley Call for Papers Now Open
- DevOps Summit Silicon Valley Call for Papers Now Open
- Strengthen Your Business Reputation with Every Application Interaction
- Intelligent Systems in Transportation
- PEER 1 Hosting to Exhibit at Cloud Expo New York
- Learn How You Can Easily Extend Your Infrastructure with Microsoft Azure
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Why Recovering a Deleted Ext3 File Is Difficult . . .
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less