Welcome!

Linux Containers Authors: Elizabeth White, Liz McMillan, Yeshim Deniz, Zakia Bouachraoui, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

Linux on the Desktop: An Open Letter to Antitrust, Competition, Consumer, and Trade Practice Monitoring Agencies Worldwide.

A plea for "relief from Microsoft's escalating anti-competitive tactics."

The role of trade practice and antitrust legislation is to provide the consumer with protection from abusive business practices and monopolies. In one of the most serious cases of monopolization in the information technology industry, the agencies charged with protecting the competitive process and the consumer have utterly failed to stem the offending corporation's anti-competitive practices.

The Microsoft corporation has been under continuous investigation by antitrust policing agencies since 1989. Despite this scrutiny, the Microsoft corporation, using covert and overt anti-competitive business tactics, has maintained an unabated campaign against alternatives to Microsoft Windows operating system platforms and Microsoft applications.

For years the Microsoft corporation has earned around 70% to 80% net profit from sales of its operating systems and application software. Only in areas like Thailand, where Linux on the desktop has just begun to gain a foothold, has Microsoft stated that it will release versions of its operating system platform and application software at a lower price to Original Equipment Manufactures (OEMs) and retail consumers than is available in the rest of the modern world. Consumers benefit where real competition exists.

The world desktop operating system market remains predominantly monopolized by Microsoft. Over the last decade, Microsoft continued to lever its desktop platform monopoly to the point where it now holds a dominant position worldwide in the application office suite and Web browser software markets. On its own, the current USA Department Of Justice (DOJ) settlement with the Microsoft corporation has failed to bring about any restoration of serious competition to the desktop operating system market. Microsoft continues to use similar anti-competitive business tactics in an attempt to monopolize the digital media player and the desktop services server markets. Competing vendors increasingly find that they can no longer compete with Microsoft if they limit themselves to only the traditional closed source model of software development.

In the last six years information technology vendors have adopted techniques and resources from two existing movements geared toward the construction of software. The newer open source movement, represented by the non-profit Open Source Initiative (OSI) corporation, emphasizes the licensing of software in a manner which encourages its collaborative development in an open environment. The older free software movement, represented by the non-profit Free Software Foundation (FSF), focuses on the ethical issues surrounding the licensing of software. The free software movement emphasizes freedoms which are often taken for granted outside of the field of software: the freedom to use, study how something works, improve or adapt it and redistribute.

The Free Software Foundation offers two software license schemes which are compatible with their own goals and those of the Open Source Initiative: The GNU General Public License (GPL) and the GNU Library General Public License (LGPL). Essentially, the GPL and LGPL licenses grant the recipient extra rights than that granted by copyright law. Both licenses insure that a contributer or distributer of a GPL or LGPL licensed work may not further impede downstream recipients the rights granted by the same license. Many developing software in an open source manner have realized that this benefit offered by the GPL and LGPL licenses outweigh any potential losses. The licensing also insures that no contributing or distributing vendor or group of vendors could potentially monopolize the market, insuring that real market competition dictates price. Just as the automotive industry can commonize on standards for the production of the mechanisms of seats, instrument panels and doors while providing brand and regional differentiation across a wide array of models, the information technology community can collaboratively develop works under free licenses. Both vendors and consumers benefit from the resulting development cost reductions and competition from use of the resulting commons.

The Linux operating system and many other opens source and free applications have been developed in an open source manner under free license terms. Despite free licensing and open source licensing requiring that the source code is freely available there are numerous profitable business models. Vendors can offer proprietary software for open source platforms and/or take a hybrid approach dual licensing the development of software. Vendors can select, customizing and configure free software, offering the bundled result. Vendors can offer support services. Vendors can also offer hardware which runs the freely available software. The resulting collection of hardware, software and services has been widely deployed as a server operating environment. Many vendors, from small one person operators to large multinational conglomerates, now compete to provide goods and services for the resulting platform. Linux has restored true free market competition to the server arena.

Linux can provide just as capable a desktop platform, however Linux adoption in this area faces barriers resulting from Microsoft's anti-competitive tactics. Interoperation with Microsoft products is difficult while Microsoft continues to embrace and extend protocols developed in an open source manner, and along with Microsoft developed protocols and file formats, license the result in a manner unacceptable to competing vendors. In the field of digital media, Microsoft does not make its media player codecs available to the Linux platform. Despite the US DOJ settlement requirements for Microsoft's contracts with Original Equipment Manufactures (OEMs), Microsoft's current relationship with major OEM dealers requires OEMs to sell consumers personal computers with an operating system, in many cases requiring consumers wanting to replace Microsoft's operating system with Linux to go though a difficult refund process. Above and beyond the issues of interoperation and OEMs, customer perception is one of the greatest barriers to Linux adoption on the desktop.

The Microsoft corporation has maintained an unabated campaign against any and all competition to Microsoft's own products. The most significant common denominator to this ongoing campaign is the dissemination of Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt, commonly referred to in the information technology sector by the acronym FUD. While it is fair to point out relative deficiencies in competing vendors products or services, Microsoft corporation CEOs and agents of Microsoft have too often crossed the line by participating in the dissemination of outright untruthful statements. Refuting false allegations and incorrect assertions requires a significant effort, especially when previously refuted falsehoods are recycled and repeated as fact. Following the resulting arguments can require some technical knowledge, however in the last few years many of the more outrageously untrue statements in Microsoft's propaganda have backfired strongly enough to show up in Microsoft's own market research as a problem.

It now appears that Microsoft has chosen to escalate this disinformation campaign by actively participating in a situation to discredit the viability of the Linux platform and raise uncertainty to the cost of the Linux platform, manufacturing Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt.

The SCO Group has entered into a series of essentially inherently flawed lawsuits and fraudulent license claims against users of the Linux operating system. Since 1994, Caldera International and the Santa Cruz Operation have been accepting, profiting from and distributing software developed by hundreds of independent developers under the terms of the GPL and LGPL license. The SCO Group has failed to put forward any sustainable legal theory why it should not abide by the terms of the GPL license. Detailed investigation into other facts and evidence which regularly conflict with the SCO Group's various legal claims, filing, press and public statements, raises serous questions which can no longer be explained away by a lack of competence in either the SCO Group's CEOs or the SCO Group's legal representation.

There is now increasing evidence that Microsoft has been indirectly financing -- to the point of sustaining -- the SCO Group's campaign against Linux. Disclosed internal email memos back up by recent filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission indicate that at least a third of SCO's entire market capitalization, and their entire current cash reserve, is payoffs funnelled from Microsoft.

The relationship between Microsoft, the SCO Group and the SCO Group's recent financial backers requires immediate investigation by all agencies entrusted with providing the consumer with protection from abusive business practices and monopolies.

The adoption of Linux on the desktop offers an opportunity to restore competition to the desktop market. The resulting freeing up by natural market forces will open up opportunities for vendors beyond Linux, open source and free licensed software vendors. Microsoft's escalating anti-competitive tactics raise further barriers which the consumer should not have to continue to face. Trade practice and antitrust legislation exist to provide the consumer with protection from abusive business practices and monopolies. We ask that agencies and officials entrusted with providing the consumer with protection act according to the intent of that legislation.

Copyright © David Mohring, 2004 : Verbatim copying of this article is permitted in any medium, provided this notice is preserved.

More Stories By David Mohring

David Mohring is a New Zealand-based Linux applications developer.

Comments (9) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
James Garcia 08/07/04 01:06:22 PM EDT

I have been using a LinuxCertified laptop (which came with no Windows tax!) for past six weeks. I have to say that experience of Joe user wanting to use Linux on their desktop has come a long way. This laptop purchase and use almost felt like buying and using a Windows laptop. I think ultimately market will take care of everything. I understand having bazillions of dollars can help MS force their dominance over certain areas, but I think Linux (and other market forces) will eat up significant parts of MS profit margins over time.

Roger Thedodger 05/29/04 07:01:18 PM EDT

What a laugh! Linux penguins just can't get over the fact that Windows user don't want their linux crap. Duh. Let's run down the list. Joe Public doesn't know that Linux exists. Joe Public is too dumb to do an install. Joe is help captive by Bill Gates!

Why dont you asshole geeks get a life. You like Linux? Then shut your face and keep clicking the keyboard! Apple software is three times better than penguin shit, and WE STILL DONT WANT IT. That's why they have five percent market share.

Anyone using Windows has had a CHOICE (Apple or Windows) from day one and CHOSE Windows. Personally, I think Linux sucks. If you like it, then use it and give the rest of the world a break!

Steve Stites 03/23/04 05:47:01 PM EST

I have sent three complaints to the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission about SCO and Microsoft. Here is the latest complaint: http://users.rcn.com/srstites/jacuse/sec.complaint.html

I invite other people to also send complaints to the SEC. The SEC responds based on both the facts of the case and the volume of complaints that they receive.

Justin 03/22/04 11:08:33 AM EST

David, I don't know if you are aware, but documents revealed during the US anti-trust court case showed that MS will not let OEMs sell dual-boot machines with one MS and one non-MS OS. This was not persued by the state dept, but is, to my mind, the pinnacle of monopoly abuse.

David Mohring 03/21/04 06:25:28 PM EST

Note to Linux world editors: It should be probably be noted that the article was published on Wednesday, March 10 ...
http://itheresies.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_itheresies_archive.html
... just before Microsoft's latest round of antitrust worries from the EU, Real/Burst/Sun and some US States ...
http://news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&scoring=d&q=Microsoft+Antitrust
... and HP's announcement of Linux pre-installed desktops.
http://news.google.com/news?num=100&hl=en&scoring=d&q=HP+Linux+Asia

The kind of OEM - Microsoft "relationship" which forces Dell sell PCs with FreeDos ( A nice little free clone of DOS, but effectively useless as a modern desktop OS ) instead of without a OS or with Linux, remains the norm amongst most OEM vendors. There are only a few exceptions such as vendors specialising in Linux based systems or dealers willing to sell you an "upgrade" PC system on the tacit "understanding" that could be replacing a PC with a valid non-OEM licened copy of windows.

darnok 03/21/04 02:46:15 PM EST

Most corporates I know buy their PCs from someone like IBM, Dell, etc., then simply overwrite whatever's on there with either a SOE desktop or a standard server build. Unless the corporate is big enough to have the vendor install their SOE build for them, it doesn't matter at all what the vendor ships them with; it'll get blown away and replaced before a user sees it. These customers have MS Select agreements so Windows installed on the box is just a nuisance.

I'm pretty sure that's the reason why at least one vendor (Dell?) sells a typical corporate desktop PC with FreeDOS on it - it just gets blown away, so why bother with a Windows licence?

Aside from the issues of competing with Dell etc. in terms of buying and marketing clout, I don't see that a small PC vendor would care if they were selling PCs with Windows or PCs with Linux as far as business sales are concerned.

OTOH, if they're selling to home users, most Windows users will want Windows installed for them and most Linux users will just reinstall their own favorite distribution in their favorite configuration - the vendor may as well not bother actually installing Linux at all, but just ensure hardware drivers for all the bits in the box are readily available.

Anon 03/21/04 02:45:06 PM EST

I have started looking around for a linux desktop to replace the IBM Thinkpad I am using as my current machine. The biggest problem I will run into is convincing them that we don't HAVE to buy from Dell, IBM, etc. Anyone have any suggestions on how to approach this?

saberworks 03/21/04 02:43:54 PM EST

I have purchased two computers from LACLinux.com. The first was an athlon 2000+ laptop and the second (just a couple of weeks ago) was a p4 3.2ghz desktop machine.

They are priced higher than places like dell for comparable hardware, but they custom load each machine and even compile custom kernels for each machine. Here is my recent web log post regarding my desktop purchase.

Bob McElrath 03/21/04 02:41:50 PM EST

I maintain a list of Linux laptop vendors that sell Linux-preinstalled laptops. There are many still alive, and I encourage everyone who is going to use linux on their laptop to buy one from one of these vendors, rather than sending money to Microsoft just so you can remove their crap

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
Early Bird Registration Discount Expires on August 31, 2018 Conference Registration Link ▸ HERE. Pick from all 200 sessions in all 10 tracks, plus 22 Keynotes & General Sessions! Lunch is served two days. EXPIRES AUGUST 31, 2018. Ticket prices: ($1,295-Aug 31) ($1,495-Oct 31) ($1,995-Nov 12) ($2,500-Walk-in)
Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settlement products to hedge funds and investment banks. After, he co-founded a revenue cycle management company where he learned about Bitcoin and eventually Ethereal. Andrew's role at ConsenSys Enterprise is a mul...
Nicolas Fierro is CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions. He is a programmer, technologist, and operations dev who has worked with Ethereum and blockchain since 2014. His knowledge in blockchain dates to when he performed dev ops services to the Ethereum Foundation as one the privileged few developers to work with the original core team in Switzerland.
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
The challenges of aggregating data from consumer-oriented devices, such as wearable technologies and smart thermostats, are fairly well-understood. However, there are a new set of challenges for IoT devices that generate megabytes or gigabytes of data per second. Certainly, the infrastructure will have to change, as those volumes of data will likely overwhelm the available bandwidth for aggregating the data into a central repository. Ochandarena discusses a whole new way to think about your next...
CloudEXPO | DevOpsSUMMIT | DXWorldEXPO are the world's most influential, independent events where Cloud Computing was coined and where technology buyers and vendors meet to experience and discuss the big picture of Digital Transformation and all of the strategies, tactics, and tools they need to realize their goals. Sponsors of DXWorldEXPO | CloudEXPO benefit from unmatched branding, profile building and lead generation opportunities.
Dynatrace is an application performance management software company with products for the information technology departments and digital business owners of medium and large businesses. Building the Future of Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence. Today we can collect lots and lots of performance data. We build beautiful dashboards and even have fancy query languages to access and transform the data. Still performance data is a secret language only a couple of people understand. The more busine...
All in Mobile is a place where we continually maximize their impact by fostering understanding, empathy, insights, creativity and joy. They believe that a truly useful and desirable mobile app doesn't need the brightest idea or the most advanced technology. A great product begins with understanding people. It's easy to think that customers will love your app, but can you justify it? They make sure your final app is something that users truly want and need. The only way to do this is by ...
DXWorldEXPO LLC announced today that Big Data Federation to Exhibit at the 22nd International CloudEXPO, colocated with DevOpsSUMMIT and DXWorldEXPO, November 12-13, 2018 in New York City. Big Data Federation, Inc. develops and applies artificial intelligence to predict financial and economic events that matter. The company uncovers patterns and precise drivers of performance and outcomes with the aid of machine-learning algorithms, big data, and fundamental analysis. Their products are deployed...