| By Linux News Desk | Article Rating: |
|
| June 2, 2004 12:00 AM EDT | Reads: |
15,956 |
As anyone knows who has not been living in a cave, in 2003 Microsoft took its lawsuit overseas regarding MS Windows trademark infringement while the same issues were being heard in United States courts.
In response to Microsoft's lawsuits worldwide and to continue operating overseas, Lindows changed its product name and Web site address in April 2004 to Linspire.
Microsoft then filed a second request for a preliminary injunction in Amsterdam stating that Lindows was continuing to infringe on their trademark based on small print use of the trade name.
Currently no products are being sold under the Lindows or Linspire name into the Netherlands and the term "Lindows" is not used on the Web site except as required for corporate and copyright identification purposes. Accordingly, on May 27, the Amsterdam District Court ruled in favor of Lindows, Inc. on all counts and ordered Microsoft to pay Lindows 944 Euros.
Basically, the court agreed with Lindows that not every use of the trade name "Lindows" infringes on the trademark "Windows."
In an official company statement, Lindows, Inc. commented:
"According to the ruling Lindows has complied with the use of the trade name and can continue to use the name Lindows on a limited basis, accompanied at all times with the additional phrase that Lindows is not affiliated with "windows" [sic] in any way. Since the trade name Lindows is still legal outside the Benelux and the use of the name does not justify a competitive advantage, the court concluded that the use does not contravene the prior judgement nor the settlement agreement. The court could not require nor was it obligated to have Lindows adapt its trade name outside the Benelux, ruling there was no infringing use of the trade name, and therefore denying Microsoft's claim and ordering the company to pay Lindows 944 Euros."
"This victory is quite a turnaround," said Michael Robertson, "because Microsoft had asked for a daily fine of 100,000 euros to be levied against us and instead they are the ones required to pay."
"We hope Microsoft can move past these legal tactics and learn to compete in the marketplace rather than the courtroom," he added.
Published June 2, 2004 Reads 15,956
Copyright © 2004 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
- Microsoft's KO vs "Lindows" Name Goes to Appeal
- Lindows CEO Robertson Berates Microsoft's"Orchestrated Attempt to Slow the Adoption of Linux"
- Lindows Claims It Can't Comply with Court Order; Wants Microsoft Enjoined
- It's Official: Lindows Is Dead, Long Live "Linspire"
- Lindows Wants to Go Public
- Linspire/Lindows Under Attack Again from MS Lawyers
- Microsoft Wants Lindows Totally Erased
- "The World Doesn't Have to Suffer Through Poor Software," Says Robertson
- Microsoft's Windows Trademark Appeal Fails
- Dutch Court Gives Lindows a Pass
- As Google Kicks Off at $85, Lindows "Postpones" Its Own IPO
More Stories By Linux News Desk
SYS-CON's Linux News Desk gathers stories, analysis, and information from around the Linux world and synthesizes them into an easy to digest format for IT/IS managers and other business decision-makers.
![]() |
anOOn 06/02/04 08:42:41 AM EDT | |||
Go Lindows/Linspire! I enjoy reading the weekly Michael's Minute at their site, always a good read, except of course for the obligatory Lindows advertisements. With regards to the fight over the Lindows name, I like to see Lindows standing up for principles and also for taking on Microsoft. I applaud Lindows efforts to create a user friendly Linux release, I wish that it was a free distribution that I could just make copies of and give out to people, with revenue coming from optional support, click n run subscriptions. |
||||
![]() |
xylz 06/02/04 08:39:20 AM EDT | |||
to michael robertson's credit, even if there are things he does that I don't like, I must concede he is really relentless and aggressive in pushing lindows |
||||
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Practical Approaches for Optimizing Website Performance
- 1st Annual GovIT Expo: Letter from the Technical Chair
- Ulitzer News: Search vs New Media
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- The End of IT 1.0 As We Know It Has Begun
- Twitter, Linked In, Ning and Ulitzer: Easy Personal Branding Strategy
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Practical Approaches for Optimizing Website Performance
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- 1st Annual GovIT Expo: Letter from the Technical Chair
- Ulitzer News: Search vs New Media
- Ruby-on-Rails Apps Get Cloud Lift
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?




































