Welcome!

Linux Authors: Michael Sheehan, Lavenya Dilip, Ian Thain, Bruce Armstrong, Ellen Rubin

Related Topics: Linux, Open Source

Linux: Article

Microsoft Pays Off Lindows, Saves the Windows Trademark

Microsoft Pays Off Lindows, Saves the Windows Trademark

Microsoft has settled the trademark infringement suit that it filed against Linux desktop start-up Lindows.com in December of 2001, the suit that Lindows cleverly managed to stand on its head and turn into an action challenging the legitimacy of the Windows trademark that Microsoft won from the Patent and Trademark Office years ago under cloudy, if not dicey, circumstances.

Microsoft is paying Lindows $20 million to buy the Lindows.com name, although Lindows pretty much stopped using it a few weeks ago except in limited circumstances after Microsoft's lawyers basically got it kicked out of the Benelux. Instead Lindows changed its name and the name of its Linux operating system to Linspire.

So now Lindows or rather Linspire is going to use Microsoft's own money to advance its position on the desktop.

Lindows told the SEC this morning in an amendment to its IPO filing that it needs the money from Microsoft or the IPO to stay in business otherwise it'll be eaten alive by its historical losses and negative cash flow.

As part of the deal, which was signed last Friday, Microsoft has also granted Lindows a limited four-year royalty-free license to some of its Windows Media software, which Lindows will distribute with the Linspire OS.

In the meantime, Lindows is going to stop distributing the five Windows Media files that are bundled with Linspire 4.5, a measure that is supposed to go into effect by October 14. Microsoft has promised not sue Lindows for poaching those files.

Although Microsoft had some success in pressing its trademark infringement case against Lindows in various court in Europe, the federal court hearing the suit in the US had a distinctly bad taste in its mouth about the Windows trademark. It said it found that "There are serious questions regarding whether Windows is a non- generic name and thus eligible for the protection of federal trademark law."

Microsoft also failed to get the US Court of Appeals to hear a rare interlocutory appeal made before the district court case had a chance to start and declare the Windows trademark valid.

The district court trial, after a couple of delays, was finally supposed to start this half.

Obviously Microsoft couldn't run the risk losing the Windows name and settled out-of-court, basically an admitting that Lindows had it over a barrel.

Microsoft is supposed to send Lindows a check for $15 million by August 15 and another one for $5 million by February 1 in exchange for the domains: lindows,org, lindowsinc,net, lindowsinc.org, lindowsos.com, lindos.com, lindoors.com, lindowsemail.com, lindowsfam.com. lin----s.com, lin---s.com. lin-s.com, lin-s.com and lindash.com.

In return, Lindows is supposed to change its corporate name and stop using any Lindows variant by September 14. It can use www.lindows.com

and www.lindowsinc.com to redirect traffic until July 15, 2008, when those URL will be reassigned to Microsoft.

The agreement says Lindows has got to get all Lindows references out of its operating system by September 14 and inform distributors to stop using the Lindows name by then too.

The insipid press release the pair put out this afternoon speaks to none of the angst that the situation engendered.

There was a canned quote from Microsoft's deputy general counsel Tom Burt saying, "This case was centered on the fundamentals of international trademark law and our necessary efforts to protect the Windows trademark against infringement. This settlement addresses those concerns, and we are pleased that Lindows will now compete in the marketplace with a name distinctly its own."

Yeah, right, Tom.

Lindows CEO Michael Robertson, obviously restrained from chortling, was quoted as saying, "We are pleased to resolve this litigation on terms that make business sense for all parties."

In the settlement, Lindows throws Microsoft a bone and acknowledges the validity of the Windows trademark.

More Stories By Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Comments (8) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Lepriapus 07/20/04 08:54:55 PM EDT

How does the gentleman who owns the product formally known as Lindows, walk with such big balls. I am a Suse person, but might buy his product just to support his continueing harrassing of WIndblow$

Bruce Hogman 07/19/04 10:31:47 PM EDT

The trademark case is moot until someone else presses the issue and drags up the whole thing again. Microsoft merely forestalled this attempt. Another entry will soon find itself to joust in court, fueled this time by all the information already placed before the public. Microsoft would do well to find a new trademark. That only makes sense. Then, it can shrink wrap all the current software as an enhanced upgrade and charge two arms and a leg rather than just one. Regarding IE6: get FoxFire. Regarding Microsoft's flagship product: get a Mac

jesus 07/19/04 10:17:41 PM EDT

I am really sad, for the following reason that settle mean that anyone that tries anything with the indows then you are screwed which states then the microsoft is patenting a term Windows as its own but then what do you cool the thing you look out of, or it like me saying ok I name my operating system ummmmmmm light operating system That makes no sense and This case should be no different Windows is a generic term and should not be used by any one else

Do they get paid for everytime the word windows is used anywhere?????

Brian Hall 07/19/04 05:31:05 PM EDT

why don't i set up my own company "Brian's Windows" and get 20 million off microsoft

raif thomas 07/19/04 05:25:33 PM EDT

Great article! Shows the complete stupidity of trademark law -- right up there with software patents.

Peter D Cox 07/19/04 05:25:30 PM EDT

What a pity that Lindows gave in: but I suppose $20M is a lot in anyone's currency, though the threat to Microsoft was surely worth more. And Microsoft doesn't really win, it just demonstrates is avarice, its intent to get its own way whatever anyone - even the courts - think. It is now losing browser share - my business all but bans the use of IE6 because of security flaws - and the desktop will be next. It won't affect Bill Gate's personal fortunes much, but long term Microsoft will not survive with its kill-em-all ethos.

Peter D Cox 07/19/04 05:23:02 PM EDT

What a pity that Lindows gave in: but I suppose $20M is a lot in anyone's currency, though the threat to Microsoft was surely worth more. And Microsoft doesn't really win, it just demonstrates is avarice, its intent to get its own way whatever anyone - even the courts - think. It is now losing browser share - my business all but bans the use of IE6 because of security flaws - and the desktop will be next. It won't affect Bill Gate's personal fortunes much, but long term Microsoft will not survive with its kill-em-all ethos.

Peter D Cox 07/19/04 05:21:39 PM EDT

What a pity that Lindows gave in: but I suppose $20M is a lot in anyone's currency, though the threat to Microsoft was surely worth more. And Microsoft doesn't really win, it just demonstrates is avarice, its intent to get its own way whatever anyone - even the courts - think. It is now losing browser share - my business all but bans the use of IE6 because of security flaws - and the desktop will be next. It won't affect Bill Gate's personal fortunes much, but long term Microsoft will not survive with its kill-em-all ethos.