|By Linux News Desk||
|August 12, 2004 12:00 AM EDT||
One says that Mac has roughly 3% of the desktop market, and that the Linux share is considerably lower than that. Meantime another maintains that Linux already captured the No. 2 spot in 2003. The magazine Wired, on the other hand, reports this month that, in the desktop market, "Mac Keeps Lead on Linux."
Who is right? Do the advances Linux has recently made in making itself more consumer friendly mean it can now compete directly with the Mac OS or Windows on the desktop? Can Linux unseat Mac OS as the number 2 desktop OS in the US, Europe, Australia, and Japan, and if so when?
IDC analyst Dan Kusnetzky apparently predicts that Linux will have 6% of the desktop market by 2007 - whatever the precise figure, Wired thinks that it is "Microsoft, not Apple, who is losing desktops to Linux."
Outside of the US, Europe, Australia, and Japan the story may be somewhat different. In the developing world, experts believe that Linux will become the number 2 platform, and that over time it will knock Windows from the number 1 position altogether.
Mind you, while Linux may be free, there are an awful lot of pirated copies of Windows out East, so it may take more years than anyone realizes. As one commentator at The Mac Observer bluntly expresses it, Microsoft "would rather have a pirated version of Windows being used in China, Vietnam, or Columbia than...a free copy of Linux."
|ComTIA_US_MCSE_Student 08/28/04 10:04:51 PM EDT|
Why is it that just about every computer forum concurring MS and Apple turns into childish battle ground? Isn't the idea to expand our horizons and become better human beings? Linux was invented to be an improvement of MINIX(Mini Unix), not discredit Apple or Microsoft. One of the biggest reasons Linux is so successful is the fact that it doesn't discriminate against platforms or OSs. I am speaking figuratively of course, because Linux can not truly discriminate anything.
Linux is available on the Spark platform, PPC, m68k, MIPS, ARM, s390 mainframe, x86, AMD64, Itanium, and many others. Linux is also set up for multi-booting, bootloaders such as GRUB and LILO are great examples of this. Not to mention the fact that it is Open Source, which means any one who uses it can modify it to their needs.
Now, I do not pretend to be a know it all. However, I do know enough to realize that Linux is not about debunking anybody else's opinions. As I have said before, Linux is about expanding our horizons, and providing a reliable alternative; "thinking different".
This is a big reason to give Apple respect; they are an alternative. Sure MacOS is platform sepecific, but so is Windows. About the hardware, if I were to build a dual CPU Intel Pentium IV Computer with high end spechs, I would be paying just as much as I would for a G5. If any of you want the proof, I'll build one for you.
So, instead of arguing over trivia, let's be happy that Linux is succeeding. It's an alternative, if you don't like it, that's fine, don't use it. The same could be said about Windows and MacOS. Getting in *issing contests about who's OS is better, doesn't get us anywhere. It's time for us all to grow up and start acting like adults.
|MacDuff 08/28/04 05:53:24 PM EDT|
Hmmm... seems I got the last word in about Final Cut Pro and macs in film/TV :-P
Well, just to be sure about it, an article interviewing LA industry folks at the American Film institute about the Mac platform:
|MacDuff 08/25/04 01:42:45 AM EDT|
"So there you go-straight from one horses mouth"
Interesting. Okay. "Liar", huh? Twisting someone's words is also lying, and YOU certainly did that.
I'm a composer in Toronto, the post-production center for Canada, scoring series television. I don't know what "big city" you're in, but that's where I am. And I know what I see. But first, to your slanderous twisting of my words.
I DID NOT SAY that FINAL CUT PRO is "the standard"; I said that MACS are the standard. Certainly PCs are used in post production, as are UNIX and LINUX systems and sure AVID is still in there big. But as a whole, there are more Macs in use than PCs -- WAY more. And there's a trend turning towards FCP. I don't know if there are more AVID systems or FCP out there. Probably AVID, but there are also a lot of FCP. A video producer friend of mine (mostly unglanmourous corporate and instructional) is a Windows user, and he says now that “it’s everywhere” that at least he sees, personally. Of course, does ‘everywhere” mean EVERYWHERE? No. It’s a manner of speech. Now, somehow I don;t think you meant a generality whn you said, “every single production house is firmly on the PC”. But you trying to make it look that way is absolutely rediculous.
Also, Macs (NOT singularly FCP) are big in post-audo. EVERY post-audio facility I've been in use ProTools on Macs. I don't think I have ever seen ProTools running on Windows. Maybe it's in smaller facilities, but I haven't seen them.
As for NLE, Avid and some PC systems are certainly being used. But the ratio?? Windows aint King there. And, it is NOT just wannabes using FCP. Did the wannabe nothing video guys give an Emmy to Apple for FCP? Don't think so ( http://www.macobserver.com/article/2002/08/21.4.shtml ). But hey; what do those losers at CNN know, too? ( http://www.macobserver.com/article/2001/01/18.7.shtml ), or any of the following:
NBC primetime show, "Scrubs" done on FCP:
BBC show cut on FCP:
BBC themselves adopting FCP into their systems:
CBS MOW done on FCP:
There’s more, but I’ve done enough heavy lifting to hopefully cause the readers here to question the validity of your ridiculous comments. “the only people using final cut pro are the people who place ads in the local paper and edit video at home and try to sell their half assed services, moreover every single production house here is firmly on the PC.”
BALONEY! I don’t care where you are, there’s no way that “every single production house is firmly on the PC”, and there are WAY more than wannabes using FCP.
|Mc Duff is a liar 08/24/04 07:26:33 PM EDT|
Final cut pro becoming a "standard" in the industry?? Another typical mac evangelist lie and joke- when apple comes out with a product that their moron users like they immediately assume that the 'whole' industry is using it- nothing could be farther from the truth- here where i live(read capital city)- not one single multimedia production house uses final cut pro- they actually use AVIDS $100,000 production suite(which is actually out for the mac- but performs much slower on the mac), the only people using final cut pro are the people who place ads in the local paper and edit video at home and try to sell their half assed services, moreover every single production house here is firmly on the PC-you occasionally see a dedicated SGI editing box or a casablanca- but never ever a mac-there are even moves afield to move to cinelarra in one production house because of low cost. we even have a extremely high end(high price) music production studio here called Q studio which do not touch macs -they use pyramix on the PC. There is even a multimedia school here with a state of the art motion detectors that plug onto a human body which is used for research by military, university and game programmers- what is it powered by -PC.What does the multimedia school use?Not a single mac on campus-why?no pro graphics cards and their machines are too weak for 3d(they evaluated a dual g5 2.0ghz but laughed it off due to dismal perfromance and the fact that you couldn't get 3d studio max-even linux can run studio max under emulation). I actually asked one production house why they don't use 'the industry standard final cut pro"- the response
|umlungu 08/24/04 06:50:09 AM EDT|
A killer app is all that is needed. Excel & Powerpoint did it for Windoze , Final Cut & Itunes has it for OSX. Consumer electronics will do it for Linux. I Expect to see more DVR's & general purpose media players, as well as mobile phones running Linux. However, I have used all three platforms in anger for media production and Linux (on a Dell) is by far the fastest and most stable. I would hate to be a support person for Windows. As Dell loses market share to Apple & OSX, I can see Dell starting to market their own, friendlier version of Red Hat. Then all it will take is one killer business app.
|MacDuff 08/23/04 07:00:16 PM EDT|
Hey moron! Try telling that to the entire industry that predominantly uses the Mac in their work. Do you realize that most of the porn you whack-off to was probably edited in Final Cut Pro. Are you aware of how significantly Final Cut Pro has been adopted in the industry?
The reality in the broadcast production industry is not how you see it, and with the 64 bit G5 companies like Silicon Graphics are in for a rough ride as more and more CG applications get ported to OS X.
Yes, there are less graphics cards available for the Mac. But its all being done on the HOST COMPUTER within these various programs, ya see. Although OS X uses the GPU for window redraws (something Windows users won't benefit from until "Glass" comes as part of Longhorn... when??) So, even though the selection of GPUs on the Mac platform is weaker, Apple is doing MORE with their resources than Windows has. This is just one of the advantages of the platform that I value (that being Apple's resourcefulness and innovation).
As for gaming? Sure! If I was into gaming hardcore, I'd get a PC. NO QUESTION. As it is, I play Medal of Honor, LOTR Return of The King and several other games of note on my Mac, and it fills my bill. But NEWS FLASH: not everybody uses computers the same way, and not everybody sees the world ONE way or YOUR way. You trying to dismiss the ENTIRE Mac platform on one or two points (one of which is pretty irrelevant) is weak, biased and lame.
And, if it is one guy posting under all these different "names" ("economic rationalist", "apple is the enemy of computing", "Macs are bad", etc.) you are a coward -- and very lame.
|iCreate turd 08/23/04 06:41:54 PM EDT|
Creative professiona on the mac-haha
|MacDuff 08/23/04 06:53:24 AM EDT|
With built-in Ethernet, Firewire and USB, what else would a consumer typically need? How many consumers in reality actually use those PCI slots? I know I do, but I'm a creative professional. For "the rest of us"? Far less than you'd think, I suspect :)
We're talking the masses who buy Dells with Intel's integrated "extreme" graphics, here (shared main memory). And all Macs have AGP with a legit GPU in them.
Now, about that integrated monitor, however... :-(
|Whatever 08/23/04 06:07:32 AM EDT|
The sad thing about apple is that they have probably HMHO What is the bet unix implementation that I have ever seen. I use OS X as my secondary machine because we support apples, and I have linux running in a VMware VM on my Dell pc to take care of other support issues. The only problem is that you can only get it on Apples proprietary hardware which no matter how you slice and dice it costs an arm and a leg (for the real machines that is - IF you want one of the closed box (i.e. no PCI slots) toy macs, you can buy into OS X for a semi reasonable price.
If linux had the ease of use of OS X, M$ would get a run for its money. Otherwise, forget it for Linux as a home OS for the time being. One can only hope that the Linux gurus will some day wake up and take a close look at why M$ is where it is (it is'nt just because of predatory practices) and then make the achingly few changes that will be needed for things to really start moving.
|Mao Tse-Tung 08/23/04 12:56:28 AM EDT|
|Fidel Castro 08/23/04 12:51:22 AM EDT|
Deje esta gente decente sola. Si usted no lo hace atacaré a su red. ¿Usted me comprendió? Todo el mundo le encanta el Macintosh.
|Linus Torvalds 08/23/04 12:44:13 AM EDT|
I support Macs. Leave these decent people alone or I will personally infect your machine.
|MacDuff 08/22/04 07:26:56 PM EDT|
Well, good luck on your Mission from God. Sounds a lot like the Spanish Conquestadors. But, the fact of the matter is that Linux is still too raw for the mainstream end-user's desktop and may never reach the level of refinement that OS X and even Windows has (which isn't to say it won't gain more share; it'll just be a different kind of "difficult" than Windows is for those misguided, casual users stupid enough to listen to you.
This is one twit who is quite happy being a Mac user. Sorry we don't measure up, whoeverthehellyouare.
|mac=turd 08/22/04 06:30:44 PM EDT|
Sorry MacDuff but you don't understand-apple is one of the worst companies and it is my duty to inform people when some "jehovah evangelist" shows up.Mac=bad, simple, short and sweet.Who cares what macs are getting done-they are just plain evil and the company behind them is just a bunch of pathetic liars(eg-apple had to withdraw the quake 3 scores off their website-because they flat out lied about the fps scores compared to a dell (dull)pc).Fundamentalist apple communist twit users are just that and will always be just that
|MacDuff 08/19/04 09:54:29 PM EDT|
What a bunch of anti-Apple bullshit you guys are flinging. Ten tons of IGNORANT bias. No platform is perfect (and do tell me what you hate about Linux, please), but you guys have to get some of your facts straight before you can poop all over the platform. And ya know what? I aint gonna bother even trying to peel yer eyeballs open. Been here before, and you don’t like to accept it. Meanwhile, there are other more prominent Linux users who have peeled their eyeballs open (Moshe Barr, Simon Kozens in the U.K. -- and "PC luminaries" like Taco and whathisface at Slashdot and also Anand at Anandtech) who have excercised some objecitivity to see what the Mac platform has going for it. The result? They've added Macs to their computer usage and they dig them. They've got the objectivity to not only ciriticize the platform for legitimate reasons but also to appreciate it as well. Do you??
Also, keep in mind that not all platforms are suited for all needs and users, and there's no law -- nor should there be -- saying that you MUST be a geek to use a computer. For millions and millions of people in this world, the opinions of some NICHE hardcore Linux dudes is completely irrelevant (you think Macs are “niche”? You should think about how “niche” the ubergeek market segment is!). You can bleat on about how Macs suck, while they're gettting work done and not having to recompile the wheel, if you get my meaning.
|buddhist 08/19/04 07:22:47 PM EDT|
Blind mac evangelists like jose do nothing for the platform except prove that apple users are just a bunch of religious fundamentalists.I'm just glad that the platform i use doesn't screw me over like apple seems to do to it's customers with hardware and software-apple would have you believe that the sky is yellow.Funny thing is money talks and bull*hit walks, and apple has been walking for oh so long. Just wait soon the mac evangelists will start recruiting from macaddict forums and macworld forums to help their arguments.Apple all in all smell rotten
|macs are bad 08/19/04 05:58:39 PM EDT|
Yes apple provide lots of choices-want to video edit-choose from three packages(from apple),want to play the latest game(doom 3)-get stuffed i can write it myself,.It's really funny when people consider less than a handful of apps a complete solution and full of choice-wheres premiere for the mac,where's framemaker,wheres sonar,wheres the latest game(....insert title here),wheres the professional graphics cards,wheres a complete 7.1 sound solution....., where's three internal drive bays,where's raid 5?Oh apple's selling MUSIC are they-with gore on their board it's not worth squat-they are selling artists out to fundamentalism. The productivity thing is shallow and garbage-anyone can be productive on anything(an atari st can bring out productivity).Fact is apple can't be too good when they lost out to a company like microsoft with their inferior products, people voted with their wallets and people are still voting with their wallets-just look at how poor g5 sales are-people know apple stands for bad rubbish.Elegance? theres nothing elegant about having to pay for all those software updates for an os which came out as a beta and apple charged for-reliability??just look at what the above apple dealer in australia is doing to users-that's reliability??Oh that's right AMWAY own a considerable stake in apple-speaks volumes. You can take your totalitarian apple company and make sauce out of it, i hope it rots jose.Apple is anti computing and anti choice.
|MacDuff 08/19/04 12:51:36 AM EDT|
Well said, Jose :)
|Jose L. Hales-Garcia 08/19/04 12:43:49 AM EDT|
"...because when you buy a mac you have no choice..."
Choice is only one aspect of computing, and arguably an illusory one. Productivity is another. You can keep all the hardware and Linux variations and combinations under the sun. I'll take the elegance, reliability and ease of use which keeps me focused on being productive. Just because you like building your computers and I don't is no reason to be intolerant of each other. We just enjoy different aspects of computers.
I got a lot of work done today and I'm greatful to Apple for providing me with some of the tools that helped me accomplish them. Any tools they didn't provide I could have built from source or written myself. On software at least no one can make the claim that Macs don't provide choices.
|apple is the enemy of computing 08/18/04 10:38:22 PM EDT|
The best thing apple could do is just go away forever.If apple was the dominant company selling computers i can safely say that the internet would be tiny-no one would be able to afford a computer to get on the net, comments like the one i read above"we want to sell computers to bmw buyers...", just reinforces how lame apple is as a company, they deserve to fade away.Ditching my mac was the best thing- at last i can use a computer - and have CHOICE- apple is anti choice, because when you buy a mac you have no choice- just a handful of "apple communist" applications-imagine if you had kids and a mac-your kids would kill you because they could get NOTHING to satisfy their gaming urges- hell just try buying a PROFESSIONAL GRAPHICS CARD for the mac- i'm not talking game cards like the x800 or 6800/9800xt but nvidia quaddro, ati fire gl, wildcat cards- oh sorry apple is just for general consumers not professionals- toy computers at premium prices, and toy users with "amway" mentality.My take on linux is Apple is like a totalitarian regime like microsoft/stalinist russia, whereas linux is a free democratic nation- after all isn't al gore on the board of apple?remember what his wife tipper gore tried to do to popular music in the late 80's- remember the WASHINGTON WIVES and the PMRC(parents music resource centre)- i think groups like u2,madonna,wasp ozzy osbourne would certainly remember tipper- i think the phrase "al gore and tipper gore/pmrc/washington wives" speaks volumes of horrible apple.
|Jose L. Hales-Garcia 08/16/04 10:54:37 AM EDT|
Intolerance is nothing new. Instead of vitriol toward Apple why don't you share the great things you are doing with Linux. A more favorable impression toward Linux couldn't be made. Waiting for Apple to go out of business are you? That's pretty funny. I hope you're not charging your boss for the time you're spending on this pipe dream.
|economic rationalist 08/15/04 11:00:43 PM EDT|
HOORAY FOR ZARDOZ.Personally i got frustrated with apples hardware-g5 pro machine with 2 internal drive bays-what a bad joke, as for the sound BLECHHH-TWO CHANNEL STEREO JOKE. I didn't bother retaining my apple machines- just gave apple the flick and switched to a pc runin linux-windows is good for only games.As for that comment regarding the apple centres in canberra-VERY BAD i have heard about the managers practice of exchanging internal components for older lower specced ones from many people- but then again many apple users never open up their machines, or even know the mhz, so it is their own fault partly, if apple sellers are doing this how can you trust such a dishonest company that screws its users over.It'll be a cold day in hell when i buy my next mac.
|Doppelganger 08/14/04 05:05:57 PM EDT|
fyi, X11 is the server for graphic desktops. it is not itself clunky, some desktops on it are. For the Mac users about, I suggest looking into gnome for the more Mac-ish experience. And with a properly configured box (which I'll grant is the biggest problem with linux), you won't notice all the complicated bits and entrails below that spiffy desktop
|Jose L. Hales-Garcia 08/13/04 02:57:45 AM EDT|
According to Apple death reports there is no market share left to take from Apple.
But Mac is a fun and inclusive operating system. It is so simple to use and does cool things like iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, GarageBand, stream to Airport Express. I couldn't imaging using anything as complicated as Linux and as clunky as the X11 windows system for just doing things involving my family. There is an added bonus too. If my kids want to get into the nerdy stuff, Mac OS X has a complete UNIX system under the hood as well. It's reassuring to know that the terminal is there to teach them how a computer does all these wonderful things.
|Zardoz 08/12/04 10:00:00 PM EDT|
No mac user would switch to linux eh?I did and i must say things can't be better- no longer do i have to worry about spending australian $229 on every update to os X(considering there have been 4 updates), the whole Philosophy of linux is what i love(apple and microsoft are as evil as each other-apple worse"quote from apple centre Fyshwick-"we are only interested in selling machines to people who buy mercedes benz or BMW- if you don't have money go away"-funny considering that most musicians are poor and struggling and this is what their beloved apples philosophy is), new life has even been breathed into my old macs- something that apple wouldn't do with os X-can you say old powermac 8500 with pre-emptive multitasking/memory protection apple?Damn you and all your blind evangerlists to hell apple(good one mr peemoeller-you know who you are, and mr hogg what a dishonest businessman you are-switching mac innards for lower spec parts-really).
|tsteele 08/12/04 07:07:07 PM EDT|
None of this really matters. I still don't understand why Linux users want to dis the Mac so much. The fight is against Windows, and both platofrms should join forces. Besides, the Mac OS is a very slick implementation of FreeBSD. If you want to supplant Windows, you need to design something as easy to install and use as the Mac on top of Linux. Do that, and it will be just Apple hardware with MacOS and PC hardware with Linux. Windows will die out as it rots in infamy like the Romans and the Greeks!
|Jin Ho 08/12/04 06:24:36 PM EDT|
Well, it's just hype for now. There are many ways to calculate sales (or marketshare). One of the *easiest* way to measure is by "sales-in" numbers (sales from product vendors to distributors). Using this approach, the market research companies or the product vendors sums up all the units that's shipped and stored in distributor/retailer warehouse (like Walmart's), rather than *sold-through* to consumers.
However after a few months, if the "sales through" (also called "sales out") numbers are low... meaning if no consumers bought the units, the whole shipment can be returned back to the vendors. This return or stock balancing are usually not reported. Worsestill, some companies have problems with "fake" sales moving between the vendor and the distributors (channel stuffing), and they don't amount to any real use.
A similar measurement foul-up happened to Nokia's Engage portable game console. We see different parties claiming different numbers because they measure different things.
So just chill out, ask where the numbers come from, how is it measured before jumping to any conclusion.
As far as I'm concerned, Windows is still #1, Mac is still the coolest, and Linux is still the most "free". 8^)
|MacDuff 08/12/04 03:33:56 PM EDT|
Apple's "share" always gets confused and confuzzled (“confuzzled” is even more confusing than the state of "confused"). There is the QUARTERLY SALES MARKETSHARE measurement -- the percentage of computer sales in any given quarter and how many of those computers were Apple's, Dells, HP's, etc. And then, there is the percentage of INSTALLED BASE. In raw units, Apple is shipping more of just about all their computers than they have in years. This is great news. The problem is that their piece of the pie LOOKS smaller, because the PC guys are selling even MORE units than Apple — but Apple is selling more units than it did before. It’s a perception thing, and perception is rarely in tune with reality.
Apple's quarterly sales marketshare fluctuates EVERY QUARTER between 3 and 8 (or more) percent, depending on what you're measuring (laptop, desktop) and where (North America, Europe, Asia etc.). Their installed base, on the other hand, is estimated at about 10%; between 25 and 30 million users, worldwide. That's counting brand spanking new G5 systems, right down to an aging but operational Performa 5200 (of which Apple sold TONS of to schools in the mid 90’s pre-Jobs’ return).
And I am part of that installed base. I bought OS X Panther last year, upgraded to the Logic Audio Pro music production suite, have purchased several game titles, am contemplating the new Office upgrade -- and have sunk about CAN$1,500.00 into upgrading my five year old G4 Powermac, which now has 2GB RAM, an ATI 9000 GPU, 72 and 120GB internal drives, a Pioneer 8X intenal DVDRW and a dual 1.3GHz G4 processor upgrade. On top of that, I also purchased TWO 17" NEC flat panels for it. All togther, I guess I have probably spent about CAN$4,000.00 in the past eight months on hardware and software upgrades. All that, but I didn't buy a new Mac last quareter, nor have I bought a new Mac since 1995. Regardless, that's a fair chunk of dough coming from one end-user, and even EA Games got a blip or three on their Mac sales from my game purchases (via Aspyr; the Mac company that ports many EA Games and other titles to the Mac). So, that has to account for something, no matter what platform one uses. But, in counting how many units Apple moved last quarter compared to the other guys, that $4,000.00 doesn’t count. That’s unfair to any platform, and is why quarterly marketshare is innacurate. And yet, it is completely taken as the defining measurment of a platform’s health... and that’s a crying shame.
|mike 08/12/04 03:19:16 PM EDT|
definitely linux is about windows alternatives..no one would switch from Mac OS to linux...but linux share should be rising for the same reason windows share is so high.. people buy new computers every 2, 3 years as opposed to every 3, 4 with a Mac. Analyst Paul Thurrott said he's gets a new *ahem $400 Del every YEAR...
Let's talk about installed base, not marketshare.. Apple has 25 million loyal users.. how many does Linux have? Because in the real world, in the homes where the real people live.. Linux does not yet exist.
|anonymous 08/12/04 11:41:44 AM EDT|
Have you heard of the windows starter edition? It is aimed at third world countries(significantly cheaper), and microsoft recently announced that it would inlude more nations. Although more distros are charging their customers for the software itself plus updates/support, linux nonetheless is free. However because of compatibility, ease of use/familiar interface, and most of all OEM distribution, windows is going to be OS of choice.
So for your information, windows is not going to be knocked out in fareast asia.
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
Nov. 27, 2014 04:00 PM EST Reads: 1,214
The security devil is always in the details of the attack: the ones you've endured, the ones you prepare yourself to fend off, and the ones that, you fear, will catch you completely unaware and defenseless. The Internet of Things (IoT) is nothing if not an endless proliferation of details. It's the vision of a world in which continuous Internet connectivity and addressability is embedded into a growing range of human artifacts, into the natural world, and even into our smartphones, appliances, and physical persons. In the IoT vision, every new "thing" - sensor, actuator, data source, data con...
Nov. 27, 2014 04:00 PM EST Reads: 1,599
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
Nov. 27, 2014 03:00 PM EST Reads: 1,427
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
Nov. 27, 2014 03:00 PM EST Reads: 1,242
The 3rd International Internet of @ThingsExpo, co-located with the 16th International Cloud Expo - to be held June 9-11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York City, NY - announces that its Call for Papers is now open. The Internet of Things (IoT) is the biggest idea since the creation of the Worldwide Web more than 20 years ago.
Nov. 27, 2014 03:00 PM EST Reads: 893
An entirely new security model is needed for the Internet of Things, or is it? Can we save some old and tested controls for this new and different environment? In his session at @ThingsExpo, New York's at the Javits Center, Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, reviewed hands-on lessons with IoT devices and reveal a new risk balance you might not expect. Davi Ottenheimer, EMC Senior Director of Trust, has more than nineteen years' experience managing global security operations and assessments, including a decade of leading incident response and digital forensics. He is co-author of t...
Nov. 27, 2014 01:00 PM EST Reads: 1,626
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
Nov. 27, 2014 11:00 AM EST Reads: 1,232
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
Nov. 27, 2014 10:00 AM EST Reads: 1,191
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
Nov. 27, 2014 08:00 AM EST Reads: 1,188
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
Nov. 27, 2014 07:45 AM EST Reads: 1,483
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Nov. 27, 2014 07:00 AM EST Reads: 1,456
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
Nov. 27, 2014 06:45 AM EST Reads: 1,348
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
Nov. 27, 2014 06:45 AM EST Reads: 1,294
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
Nov. 27, 2014 04:00 AM EST Reads: 1,185
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
Nov. 27, 2014 04:00 AM EST Reads: 1,132
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Nov. 26, 2014 02:00 PM EST Reads: 1,583
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Nov. 24, 2014 07:00 PM EST Reads: 1,704
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
Nov. 24, 2014 12:00 PM EST Reads: 1,598
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Nov. 24, 2014 11:00 AM EST Reads: 1,723
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
Nov. 24, 2014 09:00 AM EST Reads: 1,756