Welcome!

Linux Authors: Greg Akers, Liz McMillan, Michelle Drolet, Elizabeth White, Richard Moulds

Related Topics: Linux

Linux: Article

Why Build Development Tools for Linux?

Why Build Development Tools for Linux?

I was introduced to Linux in 1992, when the first version was available. At the time I was visiting Poland and my company was building an inventory control system.

One of our partners had decided to use Linux to run their inventory system. What led them to use this little-known operating system for a critical task such as inventory control? Basically, they determined that it was their only viable option. DOS did not meet their needs for scalability and stability. Unix would have served their needs, but it was simply too expensive for them at the time. They had heard that Linux offered the scalability and stability of Unix, and figured it was worth their while to give it a try. It met their expectations, and they became very early Linux evangelists.

Upon hearing these partners praise Linux, I smirked. Based on my past experiences, I thought that all free software was poorly developed and unreliable. I certainly wouldn't trust it for something as critical as an inventory control system.

After I had completely discounted Linux, I noticed it slowly creeping into the development world. Developers at my software development companies in the U.S. and Poland brought in Linux machines here and there, and there was some buzz about Linux around the industry. Still, I didn't take it seriously. People were experimenting with these machines, but critical work was still performed on Unix and Windows systems.

Eventually, developers and system administrators started to take Linux seriously. I think that one key factor in this trend was Sun's 1991 shift from the SunOS (based on BSD) to Solaris. Many people who were previously happy with the SunOS -- myself included - were disappointed with Solaris' changes, and started to explore alternatives when it came time to upgrade or expand. Upon realizing that Linux was actually closer to the old SunOS than Solaris was, many SunOS devotees migrated to Linux.

By 1994, Linux was emerging as a serious development platform for C and C++. It seemed clear that Linux was a stable and viable development platform, and Parasoft was receiving numerous requests for a version of our Insure++ runtime error-detection tool that could help Linux developers find memory corruption, memory leaks, and other critical C/C++ errors. In response, we decided to port Insure++ to Linux, and released a version for Linux in 1995. It was well received by the Linux community, and it was the only tool of its kind on Linux for almost 5 years - a situation that is very rare in the software industry.

Based on the success of these initial efforts to produce development tools for the Linux community, we decided to port our other C and C++ products to Linux. We soon ported CodeWizard to Linux to help Linux developers automatically check whether their code complies with coding guidelines designed by gurus such as Scott Meyers. In 1999-2000, when we were developing the C++Test unit testing and coding standard analysis product, our Linux products were selling well and Linux was quite popular among C and C++ developers. Consequently, we designed this product to operate on Linux from the start. After Linux took the C/C++ world by storm, it started to catch on in the Java world. In response to this development, we ported Jtest, a Java unit testing and coding standard analysis product, to Linux in 2001.

Today, Linux remains a prime market for development tools. Linux developers are typically among the best developers; most take extreme pride in their code and are very receptive to tools that will help them produce better code faster. I think Linux will continue to be a good market for development tools unless the Balkanization of the market makes it impractical to produce development tools for all available flavors of Linux. With so many different Linux flavors being promoted by IBM, RedHat, Novell, and so on, development tool vendors either need to port applications to all of these versions of Linux, or settle with supporting only one or two. I hope that the industry reaches a resolution so that Linux development does not miss a beat.

More Stories By Adam Kolawa

Adam Kolawa is the co-founder and CEO of Parasoft, leading provider of solutions and services that deliver quality as a continuous process throughout the SDLC. In 1983, he came to the United States from Poland to pursue his PhD. In 1987, he and a group of fellow graduate students founded Parasoft to create value-added products that could significantly improve the software development process. Adam's years of experience with various software development processes has resulted in his unique insight into the high-tech industry and the uncanny ability to successfully identify technology trends. As a result, he has orchestrated the development of numerous successful commercial software products to meet growing industry needs to improve software quality - often before the trends have been widely accepted. Adam has been granted 10 patents for the technologies behind these innovative products.

Kolawa, co-author of Bulletproofing Web Applications (Hungry Minds 2001), has contributed to and written over 100 commentary pieces and technical articles for publications including The Wall Street Journal, Java Developer's Journal, SOA World Magazine, AJAXWorld Magazine; he has also authored numerous scientific papers on physics and parallel processing. His recent media engagements include CNN, CNBC, BBC, and NPR. Additionally he has presented on software quality, trends and development issues at various industry conferences. Kolawa holds a Ph.D. in theoretical physics from the California Institute of Technology. In 2001, Kolawa was awarded the Los Angeles Ernst & Young's Entrepreneur of the Year Award in the software category.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.