Linux Containers Authors: Elizabeth White, Yeshim Deniz, Jignesh Solanki, Stackify Blog, Pat Romanski

Related Topics: Linux Containers

Linux Containers: Article

Rumors of Microsoft's Demise Are Premature...But Not Unthinkable

"The improbable is possible - leaders have been dethroned in the past"

Penguinistas have long loved to ruminate over a beer about the potential reversal of market share between Microsoft and companies offering open source solutions. But such ruminations were often left to discussions at the pub or the local LUG meeting because in a corporate business setting, even the most die-hard Penguinistas might be cautious about being thought of as wacko - at least in North American and European business settings.

Software market watchers are now taking more serious assessments of the penguin versus butterfly competition, as Microsoft matures and Linux continues to put large growth numbers on the board.

The more vocal observers' voices in this choir are typically located outside the United States. For example, Tectonic, an online open source magazine based in South Africa, recently quoted Novell SA systems engineer and business manager Allison Singh as going on record that Microsoft's Windows juggernaut will become an operating system for niche tasks while Linux takes over the mainstream desktop and server roles. According to Tectonic, Singh forecast that users who need specific applications written for Windows only will stick with the OS, but for most other users, the rapidly evolving Linux desktop will become the standard operating system. Here's the link for that story: www.tectonic.co.za/view.php?id=324.

But wait! Tectonic calls itself "Africa's Source for Open Source News," and Singh, a Novell SA employee, could not be called an impartial observer. Penguinistas might put stock in Singh's vision over a beer, but the kind of market observers who carry weight with Wall Street would never consider discussing open source as a serious competition for the software market incumbent, would they?

Perhaps not in such blunt terms, but renowned business scholars such as Harvard Business School Professor Clayton Christensen, the innovation guru, are taking a hard look at the prospects of open source taking serious market share from Microsoft.

In his recent book, Seeing What's Next, which he coauthored with Erik Roth and Scott Anthony, Christensen provides a sober, theoretical framework for circumstances under which companies offering modular open source solutions have a competitive advantage over companies offering the integrated architectural solutions such as Microsoft's Windows franchise.

In a nutshell, Christensen and his co-authors argue that when modular commodity products such as the Linux kernel are "good enough" for the jobs of price-sensitive market tiers, those commodity products are positioned to take market share from integrated solutions that "overshoot" the performance demands of customers in any given market tier, particularly the more price-sensitive lower market tiers.

The Christensen team writes that as companies race to meet the performance expectations of the more functionality-sensitive upper-tier customers, who are willing to pay a premium for the latest and greatest, those companies will inevitably innovate ahead of the performance demands of the more price-sensitive market tiers. For customers in the more price-sensitive market tiers, performance of the modular commodity is often "good enough" to win the job bid or close the sale.

Most industry observers are now coming to see that for the average desktop functions, the operating system and the office productivity suite are basically "done." In other words, the market leader has overshot the demands of customers such as schools, governments, and businesses who only need to provide their office workers with basic office productivity functions and Internet accessibility.

It's the Packaging, Stupid...

The secret is out. The value of open source business models is in the packaging - whether you are talking about the value-add of HP's SUSE Linux nx5000 desktop, or IBM's GNU Linux blade servers, or Google and Amazon.com offering access to their GNU Linux-powered search and merchandising services, or whether you are talking about the mass-customization of Linux software packaging and maintenance offered by Red Hat and Progeny.

Publishing whiz Tim O'Reilly believes that this new software business is so different from the traditional model followed by vendors like Microsoft that the new model deserves to be called a "paradigm shift."

For example, in his keynote speech at the Open Source Business Conference 2004 in San Francisco, he asked the packed room of business managers how many present used Linux. All but 20% raised their hands. He then asked for a show of hands as to who uses Google. Everyone raised their hands, at which point Tim noted that the 20% who didn't raise their hands the first time are still operating under the old paradigm. It's the packaging, stupid. Businesses will be able to challenge Microsoft because they are using new models to make an end run around the market leader's hammerlock on the desktop.

If this mode of software packaging is really a paradigm shift, shouldn't there be a fancy new theory explaining it all? Yup. And there is. It's what Christensen's team calls "the law of conservation of integration." Here's how Christensen and his coauthors explain this law in Seeing What's Next:

Conservation of integration holds that, when an interdependent system architecture is necessary to optimize performance at a stage of value added that is not good enough, the architecture of the product or service at the adjacent stage of value added must be modular and conformable in order to optimize the performance of what is not good enough. In simple terms, modular stuff must surround integrated stuff to optimize the integrated stuff.

Christensen's team says that the Linux kernel is a perfect example of innovating in ways that wouldn't work with Windows:

Consider the difference between Microsoft Windows and the Linux operating system. Windows is a highly integrated, interdependent operating system. To optimize the operating system, applications developers must conform their products to meet Microsoft's interface requirements. Efforts to try to modify Windows to improve individual applications would be disastrous; any individual change would have literally thousands of unanticipated consequences and operating system problems. Linux works the other way, because its goal is to enable optimized applications. The Linux operating system itself is modular. As long as you follow the rules, you can modify it to optimize the performance of an application.

This conservation of integration continues to drive the sales growth of Linux wrap-arounds. For example, in an article dated August 25, 2004, Michael S. Mimoso, senior news editor for SearchEnterpriseLinux.com, cited a Gartner study of the second quarter of 2004 showing that worldwide server revenue grew 7.7% to $11.5 billion. As of the end of that quarter, IBM remained the leader in global server revenue with 30.7% market share, HP was at 27.3%, Sun was at 13%, and Dell was at 9%, with Dell enjoying the biggest revenue jump (20.1%) year-over-year. The money is definitely there for those with a business plan to find it (http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/ originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1002420,00.html).

Microsoft Is Maturing

Here's another poorly kept secret: Microsoft is maturing. On July 20, 2004, Microsoft announced its intent to issue the largest stockholder payout in history in the form of a stock repurchase of over $30 billion and an increased dividend for a package that could total $75 billion over four years. Such an investor reward is more typical of a so-called "widows and ophans" stock, rather than the growth rocket of the Microsoft of yore.

In an article for the eCommerce Times dated August 21, 2004, Steve Lohr wrote that Microsoft's decision to turn its venerable Office Suite into an office "system" is an attempt to fend off challengers such as Sun Microsystems' StarOffice and its brother, OpenOffice.org. Steve Lohr concluded that such a decision was "key" to Microsoft's future in light of its slowing growth:

Although Microsoft's Office business grew 14 percent last year, analysts forecast the rate would slow considerably this year along with the financial impact of upgrade contracts that Microsoft pressed customers to sign a few years ago. The underlying growth rate of the business, analysts say, is 6 percent to 8 percent.
- www.ecommercetimes.com/story/35988.html

Melanie Hollands, an independent IT business journalist, thinks Microsoft might have peaked in October or November of 2002, according to her article in the online IT Managers Journal on July 7, 2004:

Yes, Microsoft has a ton of cash on the balance sheet. But it's not balance sheet cash or market share that propels a stock price upward. It's growth. And growth leveled off at Microsoft about 18 months ago, when the company went ex-growth and ex-cash.
- http://management.itmanagersjournal.com/ management/04/07/06/1351259.shtml

The best evidence of the effect that open source software is having on Microsoft comes from Microsoft itself. Consider this quote from a recent Microsoft SEC filing, as reported by Jo Best of the online journal Silicon.com on September 3, 2004:

For fiscal 2005, we believe industry-wide factors such as PC unit growth and the success of noncommercial software could significantly affect our results of operations and financial condition. PC unit growth was very strong in fiscal 2004, increasing approximately 13% from fiscal 2003. We do not expect similar growth to occur in fiscal 2005.

We continue to watch the evolution of open source software development and distribution. We believe that Microsoft's share of server units grew modestly in fiscal 2004, while Linux distributions rose slightly faster on an absolute basis.

The increase in Linux distributions reflects some significant public announcements of support and adoption of open source software in both the server and desktop markets in the last year. To the extent open source software products gain increasing market acceptance, sales of our products may decline, which could result in a reduction in our revenue and operating margins.
- http://software.silicon.com/os/0,39024651,39123685,00.htm

Microsoft has proven itself to be nimble in the past, especially in regard to its famed reversal of its view of the Internet. However, Clay Christensen notes in his book The Innovator's Solution, which he coauthored with Michael Royston, that 95% of all members of the Fortune 50 have stalled some time during their tenure on that list between the years 1955 and 1995. Consider this passage from Christensen and Roysten's book.

Probably the most daunting challenge in delivering growth is that if you fail once to deliver it, the odds that you ever will be able to deliver it in the future are very low. This is the conclusion of a remarkable study, Stall Points, that the Corporate Strategy Board published in 1998. It examined the 172 companies that had spent time on Fortune's list of the 50 largest companies between 1955 and 1995. Only 5 percent of these companies were able to sustain a real, inflation adjusted growth rate of more than 6 percent across their entire tenure in this group. The other 95 percent reached a point at which their growth simply stalled, to rates at or below the rate of growth of the gross national product (GNP). Stalling is understandable, given our expectations that all growth markets become saturated and mature. What is scary is that of all these companies whose growth had stalled, only 4 percent were able to successfully reignite their growth even to a rate of 1 percent above GNP growth. Once growth had stalled, in other words, it proved nearly impossible to restart it.

Of course, Microsoft still has lots of new revenue tools to pursue, but I do think that Microsoft has some really big problems in light of the fact that their growth is slowing and their two main revenue engines have been commoditized (Windows, Office commoditized by GNU Linux and OpenOffice.org/StarOffice). So the question might be posed as follows: Will Microsoft be able to increase revenue in its up-market defenses (Office "system") and its "peripheral" ventures (Home Entertainment Hub, aka the Xbox) faster than the wave of low-end disruption erodes its revenues from its revenue leaders (Windows, Office)?

It is counterintuitive to think that Microsoft could be reduced to a niche mar-ket player as boldly predicted by Novell SA's Allison Singh. But look at the long fall that undisputed market leaders RCA and Harley Davidson took when they were hit by the disruptive technologies of Sony's transistor radios and Honda's small supercub motorcycles. You would have been laughed at if you had suggested that RCA and Harley would have been displaced when they were in their prime. Customers in North America sneered at Sony and Honda at that time, but those market entrants thrashed the market leaders with their disruptive technologies.

The improbable is possible. Leaders have been dethroned in the past. The vast majority of Fortune's 50 largest companies stalled. Many of today's serious software market observers think it could happen again with Microsoft and open source software.

More Stories By Christian Einfeldt

Christian Einfeldt is an attorney in private civil practice in San
Francisco, and producer of the up-coming documentary entitled, "The
Digital Tipping Point", to be released in September 2005. The
film will show how open source will be propelled by the same
disruptive mechanism that brought Sony, Microsoft, and others to be
market leaders. Mr. Einfeldt is a serious groupie of Harvard Business Professor Clayton Christensen, and recently delivered a keynote address on the disruptive nature of open source software at the OpenOffice.org Conference 2004 in Berlin.

Comments (19) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.

Most Recent Comments
Wesley Parish 11/20/04 05:26:25 AM EST

I myself was thinking that microsoft looks like it's gearing up to become a tools-development company; either that or a litigation company.

On one hand, it's developing something - DOT.NET - that allows multiplatform development. On the other paw, it's bulking up big in its software patenting business, and sending its Superior Officers (Steve Ballmer) worldwide spreading FUD like a cow spreading manure.

And like SCO, it may find that two business plans are two too many, and in the process of getting into the second plan, that of gung-ho litigationist, it may lose its grasp on the first business plan, because people don't care to develop for a company showing all the signs of bona fide rabidity.

Csaba 11/11/04 05:13:53 AM EST

To Tony Scandora: I'm surprised to hear that your SATA drive is not working with Linux... as I'm writing this comment right on a Linux box with SATA drive :-)
You should get a very recent distribution though to have it working, I'm running fedora core 2.
On the other hand, there are bootable CD distributions like knoppix, which make it easy to evaluate linux.
But of course I admit that running linux is not for people who will throw away the thing which is not working on the first attempt... tweeking is required almost all the time.

Tony Scandora 11/02/04 03:33:52 PM EST

I almost forgot about drivers. I have an Intel 875-based P4 motherboard, with built-in SATA that I'd like to experiment with. Intel's web site has Red Hat and SuSE drivers, but not for SATA. Windows XP is a pain, requiring users to load drivers, but at least they're available. If I want to run Linux on that system, I have to remove the SATA disk and buy an EIDE.

My unsupported SATA disks are on a system I could dedicate to Linux. Virtual PC and Virtual Server are good products that let us run lots of systems on a single computer. They have virtual disk, mouse, and keyboard drivers that can be installed on all versions of Windows, giving decent performance on virtual machines. Unfortunately, there are no virtual device drivers for Linux, which makes it a lot slower than it needs to be on a virtual machine, which would otherwise be a great no-cost platform for Windows people to evaluate Linux.

If it were easy to dual boot Linux and Windows or to run Linux on Virtual PC or Server, Windows people would be more likely to give it a test drive. The currently short list of supported drivers needs to grow before Linux can expand beyond its current market.

Al 11/01/04 09:01:33 PM EST

I think this feedback is right on the money. The biased article with quotes from biased sources completely miss the point. Until you have more hardware and software vendors giving Linux the same respect they give to Microsoft, Linux will be forced to play second fiddle. IBM, for all their Linux postering, still has no plans to migrate Notes to Linux. Even ATi won't provide supported drivers and software that allow me to take full advantage of their graphics cards. StarOffice and OpenOffice are great products -- until you create sophisticated documents that need to be shared with MS Office. By "sophisticated" I don't mean documents with embedded objects, I'm simply talking about sophisticated formatting. Serious Linux users will appreciate that none of these "issues" are inherent to Linux. Rather, they show a lack of serious interest by the hardware/software community -- those companies relied upon and trusted by corporations -- to do their part. Without them, Linux on the desktop will just be a corporate oddity and Linux on the server will just be another option. Hmm, guess I could also be talking about Apple.

Jon Ogden 11/01/04 03:44:19 PM EST

Oh No, another paradigm shift discovered by O'Reilly? Oh really? Aren't they the guys that think Python is mainstream?

The ABM crowd keeps finding new white knights who will fight the MSFT Dragon and make the world safe for geek computing, but -- so far -- St. George just hasn't turned up.

Of course it could happen that MSFT goes the way of DRI, but methinks that so far, the announcements of its demise have been greatly exagerated.

José D'Andrade 11/01/04 10:38:23 AM EST

If MS wanted, they could (and will eventually) redefine so-called Open Source. Simply put, they have always released complete sample apps from which other developers make money.

Want more? Well, they have thousands of well-coded and not-so-well-coded components that could become open. Right now there are binaries: DLLs, OCXs. But can they not open source and port into other languages?

Also, let's not forget Mono and other initiatives to make "MS Everywhere".

Yes, if you do not have an enemy inventing one is a good source of Power (read that book). I take that is what Penguinistas are all about.

Tony Scandora 11/01/04 10:16:19 AM EST

Right on the money, except the old myth about Windows application developers having to conform to Microsoft's interface requirements, while Linux application developers can make it work however they like. Technically it's true, but for home-grown applications, what is the cost of maintaining your own fork in order to support them? Even worse, can you name one ISV that requires users of its applications to run them on a specific fork?

John Doe 10/31/04 05:15:31 PM EST

But it Linux becomes mainstream, it will dominate the market and become the evil thing that needs to be defeated at all cost, no?
Let's code another OS right now to deliver us from this Linux empire and its leader Darth Linus.

Tipping 10/31/04 05:34:05 AM EST

How can I be sure to be among the first to get a ticket to see The Digital Tipping Point? Sounds like the move of the year already (for '05)!

Robert C. Worstell 10/30/04 03:47:36 PM EDT

[T]he real heart of this "disruptive technology" is the community,

There are two lines of thought in this article - 1) that Microsoft's dominance will be overthrown, comparing Linux to another listed Fortune company, 2) That free market/code/data ideals will trump closed monopolistic profiteers.

A side bar is that we have this current boom in personal computers because IBM opened up the standard for these early on (albeit, they were under anti-trust investigation at the time.)

Eduardo 10/30/04 03:28:37 PM EDT

Excellent article. I would add that the big growth breakthrough for FOSS right now is FireFox. That is because Microsoft acted like an arrogant monopolist and stoped developing IE 4 years ago, and also left it insecure to the many dangers of the web, and so left itself open to an upstart. As the saying goes, pride goeth before a fall.

Jim Graham 10/30/04 11:28:47 AM EDT

I have switched my system back and forth from Windows to Linux more times than any sane person ought to...I think I just like screwing with computers. The one thing that ultimately brings me back to Windows is the hardware compatibility. Usually, something new will come out that I have to have and it is BUILT to work with Windows, instead of me having to coax Linux to work with it.

I know many people (my wife) who when something on her computer doesn't work exactly as she planned, she wants to throw it away. These people, (the ones actually trying to use the system as a tool) are a long way from using Linux.

nels_tomlinson 10/30/04 07:46:07 AM EDT

It's a nice thought, but I think that the evidence is a little weak: we have a Linuxworld article, a Novell engineer's blog, and a Harvard academic blathering about disruptive technologies.
It could happen that MS will become a niche player, but if I had to bet money, I'd bet on MS surviving with a large market share. There's jsut too many people who have budgets to justify, and the one thing that Libre software can't help you do is squander money.

SendBot 10/30/04 07:07:04 AM EDT

If anyone could have a fully working computer that just worked reliably all the time with most software you could ever want available to you for the cost of internet access, I think *that* is the kind of appeal that would help cause accelerated growth in open souce adoption in the consumer market.

Lnx 10/30/04 06:23:23 AM EDT

I don't think we'll ever see Linux just spread like a wildfire on the desktop, we'll just wake up one day and notice Linux is everywhere. It will creep in and be assimilated slowley. It may never be a 95% desktop share but I could certainly be a significant mumber.

ClaytonChr 10/30/04 05:44:37 AM EDT

I hereby nominate Prof Christensen - if 'mere' authors are eligible, that is - to your poll of Top Twenty Software People in the World.

FOSSrocks 10/30/04 04:25:51 AM EDT

Great article. Thank you LinuxWorld!

A9 10/30/04 04:05:49 AM EDT

Upstarts like Linspire and nimble companies like Novell will be the victors without firing a shot.The real driving force of the OSS community is the community itself, as you noted at the beginning of your comment. Linspire is a mere peddler and Novell, like IBM, is one of the old-line companies that have seen the light; but the real heart of this "disruptive technology" is the community, as embodied by groups like the Debian and Gentoo distributions and the Apache and Mozilla Foundations. IBM has demonstrated their grasp of this concept quite forcefully by initiating a process whereby they will "open source" their POWER processor architecture in a manner similar to Sun's Java and The Open Group's custody of the UNIX trademark: creating a standard-setting body to regulate the minimum requirements for a particular application and certifying products that conform to those requirements.

Robert C. Worstell 10/29/04 10:22:52 PM EDT

Fascinating study. The uncharted ground is that there is a decentralized control factor at work, not a dynamic individual to create this dream, as is the case with Fortune 50/100/500 companies.

Existing companies will be /are using this to facilitate their own forward impulse. Linux is no single factor to compare with a corporate entity, but is a pervasive influence of its own.

Real comparative to Linux (as a microcosm) is the influence of John Locke and the Free Market on elder (and shrinking) Old Economies of landlocked nations who "own" their citizens. Britain and France are still kicking in their death throws from being old world powers in that bygone age of 200+ years ago.

Microsoft will be kicking for some time to come. Upstarts like Linspire and nimble companies like Novell will be the victors without firing a shot.

Robert C. Worstell

@ThingsExpo Stories
A strange thing is happening along the way to the Internet of Things, namely far too many devices to work with and manage. It has become clear that we'll need much higher efficiency user experiences that can allow us to more easily and scalably work with the thousands of devices that will soon be in each of our lives. Enter the conversational interface revolution, combining bots we can literally talk with, gesture to, and even direct with our thoughts, with embedded artificial intelligence, whic...
Imagine if you will, a retail floor so densely packed with sensors that they can pick up the movements of insects scurrying across a store aisle. Or a component of a piece of factory equipment so well-instrumented that its digital twin provides resolution down to the micrometer.
In his keynote at 18th Cloud Expo, Andrew Keys, Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise, provided an overview of the evolution of the Internet and the Database and the future of their combination – the Blockchain. Andrew Keys is Co-Founder of ConsenSys Enterprise. He comes to ConsenSys Enterprise with capital markets, technology and entrepreneurial experience. Previously, he worked for UBS investment bank in equities analysis. Later, he was responsible for the creation and distribution of life settle...
Product connectivity goes hand and hand these days with increased use of personal data. New IoT devices are becoming more personalized than ever before. In his session at 22nd Cloud Expo | DXWorld Expo, Nicolas Fierro, CEO of MIMIR Blockchain Solutions, will discuss how in order to protect your data and privacy, IoT applications need to embrace Blockchain technology for a new level of product security never before seen - or needed.
BnkToTheFuture.com is the largest online investment platform for investing in FinTech, Bitcoin and Blockchain companies. We believe the future of finance looks very different from the past and we aim to invest and provide trading opportunities for qualifying investors that want to build a portfolio in the sector in compliance with international financial regulations.
Leading companies, from the Global Fortune 500 to the smallest companies, are adopting hybrid cloud as the path to business advantage. Hybrid cloud depends on cloud services and on-premises infrastructure working in unison. Successful implementations require new levels of data mobility, enabled by an automated and seamless flow across on-premises and cloud resources. In his general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Tevis, an IBM Storage Software Technical Strategist and Customer Solution Architec...
Nordstrom is transforming the way that they do business and the cloud is the key to enabling speed and hyper personalized customer experiences. In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Ken Schow, VP of Engineering at Nordstrom, discussed some of the key learnings and common pitfalls of large enterprises moving to the cloud. This includes strategies around choosing a cloud provider(s), architecture, and lessons learned. In addition, he covered some of the best practices for structured team migration an...
No hype cycles or predictions of a gazillion things here. IoT is here. You get it. You know your business and have great ideas for a business transformation strategy. What comes next? Time to make it happen. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jay Mason, an Associate Partner of Analytics, IoT & Cybersecurity at M&S Consulting, presented a step-by-step plan to develop your technology implementation strategy. He also discussed the evaluation of communication standards and IoT messaging protocols, data...
Coca-Cola’s Google powered digital signage system lays the groundwork for a more valuable connection between Coke and its customers. Digital signs pair software with high-resolution displays so that a message can be changed instantly based on what the operator wants to communicate or sell. In their Day 3 Keynote at 21st Cloud Expo, Greg Chambers, Global Group Director, Digital Innovation, Coca-Cola, and Vidya Nagarajan, a Senior Product Manager at Google, discussed how from store operations and ...
In his session at 21st Cloud Expo, Raju Shreewastava, founder of Big Data Trunk, provided a fun and simple way to introduce Machine Leaning to anyone and everyone. He solved a machine learning problem and demonstrated an easy way to be able to do machine learning without even coding. Raju Shreewastava is the founder of Big Data Trunk (www.BigDataTrunk.com), a Big Data Training and consulting firm with offices in the United States. He previously led the data warehouse/business intelligence and B...
"IBM is really all in on blockchain. We take a look at sort of the history of blockchain ledger technologies. It started out with bitcoin, Ethereum, and IBM evaluated these particular blockchain technologies and found they were anonymous and permissionless and that many companies were looking for permissioned blockchain," stated René Bostic, Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Conventi...
When shopping for a new data processing platform for IoT solutions, many development teams want to be able to test-drive options before making a choice. Yet when evaluating an IoT solution, it’s simply not feasible to do so at scale with physical devices. Building a sensor simulator is the next best choice; however, generating a realistic simulation at very high TPS with ease of configurability is a formidable challenge. When dealing with multiple application or transport protocols, you would be...
Smart cities have the potential to change our lives at so many levels for citizens: less pollution, reduced parking obstacles, better health, education and more energy savings. Real-time data streaming and the Internet of Things (IoT) possess the power to turn this vision into a reality. However, most organizations today are building their data infrastructure to focus solely on addressing immediate business needs vs. a platform capable of quickly adapting emerging technologies to address future ...
We are given a desktop platform with Java 8 or Java 9 installed and seek to find a way to deploy high-performance Java applications that use Java 3D and/or Jogl without having to run an installer. We are subject to the constraint that the applications be signed and deployed so that they can be run in a trusted environment (i.e., outside of the sandbox). Further, we seek to do this in a way that does not depend on bundling a JRE with our applications, as this makes downloads and installations rat...
Widespread fragmentation is stalling the growth of the IIoT and making it difficult for partners to work together. The number of software platforms, apps, hardware and connectivity standards is creating paralysis among businesses that are afraid of being locked into a solution. EdgeX Foundry is unifying the community around a common IoT edge framework and an ecosystem of interoperable components.
DX World EXPO, LLC, a Lighthouse Point, Florida-based startup trade show producer and the creator of "DXWorldEXPO® - Digital Transformation Conference & Expo" has announced its executive management team. The team is headed by Levent Selamoglu, who has been named CEO. "Now is the time for a truly global DX event, to bring together the leading minds from the technology world in a conversation about Digital Transformation," he said in making the announcement.
In this strange new world where more and more power is drawn from business technology, companies are effectively straddling two paths on the road to innovation and transformation into digital enterprises. The first path is the heritage trail – with “legacy” technology forming the background. Here, extant technologies are transformed by core IT teams to provide more API-driven approaches. Legacy systems can restrict companies that are transitioning into digital enterprises. To truly become a lead...
Digital Transformation (DX) is not a "one-size-fits all" strategy. Each organization needs to develop its own unique, long-term DX plan. It must do so by realizing that we now live in a data-driven age, and that technologies such as Cloud Computing, Big Data, the IoT, Cognitive Computing, and Blockchain are only tools. In her general session at 21st Cloud Expo, Rebecca Wanta explained how the strategy must focus on DX and include a commitment from top management to create great IT jobs, monitor ...
"Cloud Academy is an enterprise training platform for the cloud, specifically public clouds. We offer guided learning experiences on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and all the surrounding methodologies and technologies that you need to know and your teams need to know in order to leverage the full benefits of the cloud," explained Alex Brower, VP of Marketing at Cloud Academy, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at 21st Cloud Expo, held Oct 31 – Nov 2, 2017, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clar...
The IoT Will Grow: In what might be the most obvious prediction of the decade, the IoT will continue to expand next year, with more and more devices coming online every single day. What isn’t so obvious about this prediction: where that growth will occur. The retail, healthcare, and industrial/supply chain industries will likely see the greatest growth. Forrester Research has predicted the IoT will become “the backbone” of customer value as it continues to grow. It is no surprise that retail is ...