| By Maureen O'Gara | Article Rating: |
|
| February 1, 2008 12:45 PM EST | Reads: |
15,618 |
Microsoft this morning made a $44.6 billion hostile bid for the floundering Yahoo, striking at a point when it has become evident to all and sundry that Yahoo doesn’t have a pray of turning things around on its own let alone getting competitive.
Yahoo’s first official reaction was basically to say it’ll think about it. It said it would evaluate the offer “carefully and promptly in the context of Yahoo’s strategic plans.” It did not give a timeframe for a response.
Although it looks pretty boxed in, it could of course try for more money.
Microsoft’s move throws open the door to rival bids, but Microsoft thinks Google’s hands are tied. Its market share would raise insuperable antitrust issues, Microsoft said, to a counter-offer.
Yahoo is the most visited site on the Internet, though it has failed to monetize its popularity and has lost share in search, and Microsoft, which has the same problems, wants the consumer traffic.
“Scale matters,” it said.
Projections peg the online advertising market being worth nearly $80 billion by 2010 and Microsoft flat out says it can’t get competitive on its own.
Microsoft has been trying to bring Yahoo to the negotiating table for 18 months in an attempt to level the playing field with the increasing dominant Google.
According to the offer letter Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer sent Yahoo last night, Yahoo rejected a merger proposal from Microsoft last February saying, “Now is not the right time from the perspective of our shareholders.”
As Ballmer observed, “A year has gone by, and the competitive situation has not improved.”
Microsoft is offering $31 dollars a share, a 62% premium to Yahoo’s beaten-down closing price of $19.18 yesterday.
Its opening bid, its first hostile bid ever, is a combination of cash and stock. Microsoft said Yahoo shareholders could pick which they wanted, expecting a 50-50 split.
Microsoft shrugs off any regulatory hurdle for itself and expects the deal, if consummated, to close in the second half.
The price is a monster even for Microsoft, whose largest acquisition to date has been the $6 billion aQuantive deal, and there are of course doubts that Microsoft can get it back. There are also real integration risks.
Microsoft thinks the two companies together offer the advertising market a significant alternative to Google, arguing economies of scale, combined R&D, accelerated innovation and operational efficiencies. It estimates at least a billion dollars a year in annual synergy from the merger.
It brushes aside the integration risks and having had more than a year to think about it, says it has a plan and a process that includes employees of both companies. Among other things, it intends to offer “significant retention packages to Yahoo engineers, key leaders and employees across all disciplines.”
Yahoo Tuesday lowered its 2008 outlook, warning it faced “headwinds” and possible spending cutbacks because of a weakening economy, its only apparent solution being to lay off about a thousand people from its swollen staff.
Published February 1, 2008 Reads 15,618
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025. Twitter: @MaureenOGara
![]() |
Yahoo! News Desk 02/01/08 10:12:16 AM EST | |||
Microsoft this morning made a $44.6 billion hostile bid for the floundering Yahoo, striking at a point when it has become evident to all and sundry that Yahoo doesn't have a pray of turning things around on its own let alone getting competitive. |
||||
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Linux Virtualization and Tired Open Source Myths
- IGEL Supports Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.0
- CloudLinux Announces Support for Atomia
- Amazon Kindle Fire Gets Its Own 'Personal Cloud Desktop' with AlwaysOnPC App Launch
- SPIRIT DSP Receives 2011 INTERNET TELEPHONY Product of the Year Award
- The Utility Infrastructure Security Market 2012-2022: Cybersecurity & Smart Grids
- FORTUNE Magazine Names Rackspace Among “100 Best Companies to Work For”
- EnterpriseDB Announces Availability of Postgres Plus Cloud Database
- Convirture Reports Strong 2011 as Virtualization Management Takes Off
- iFollowOffice Turns to Virtual Bridges and Savvis for On-Demand Virtual Desktop Services
- Swisscom Floats Red Hat Cloud
- i-Technology in 2012: Five Industry Predictions
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Amazon to Rent Out Supercomputers
- Amazon Émigré Starts Network Monitoring Firm
- HP’s Putting a Back Door in the Itanium Alamo
- Linux Virtualization and Tired Open Source Myths
- CloudLinux Announces Preferred Partner Program
- MapR Pushes the Hadoop Envelope
- Rightware Announces Gaming Performance Benchmark for OpenGL ES 3.0/Halti
- IGEL Supports Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.0
- CloudLinux Announces Support for Atomia
- 3Dconnexion Announces its Newest 3D Mouse - the SpaceMouse Pro
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- Why Recovering a Deleted Ext3 File Is Difficult . . .




















