| By Marketwire . | Article Rating: |
|
| March 27, 2008 05:06 PM EDT | Reads: |
2,723 |
BURBANK, CA -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 03/27/08 -- Throughout the years, a rumor has occasionally surfaced that a particular operating system or a certain file system -- NTFS, for example -- does not require defragmentation. Various reasons are given, but usually it is that the OS or file system was programmed in such a way that fragmentation does not occur. Interestingly, there is never concrete information given as to how exactly fragmentation is prevented. But this is for good reason: there hasn't been a file system released yet that doesn't require defragmentation.
File fragmentation is the splitting of files into parts so a disk drive can be completely filled. If each file were saved wholly as one piece, there would be considerable free space left over after the disk was full -- meaning wasted system resources. As of yet, no one has found a way to save files contiguously (with pieces all together) and at the same time make the most out of drive space.
The built-in defragmenters that are shipped with operating systems are not sufficient for users' needs, whether corporate or private. They often need to be run manually, or scheduled during times when computers are not in use. This is of course because defragmentation jobs are typically resource heavy, preventing the use of the computer while it runs. If a computer is not powered up at the time the defragmenter is scheduled to run, it will automatically begin running the next time the computer is booted up. Since a user is probably going to be using that computer when they boot it up, the defragmenter obviously cannot run then. Hence it does no good.
In between these scheduled runs (if they do indeed run) fragmentation, because of today's enormous file sizes and ever-increasing disk capacities, continues to build and impact performance. And on very large drives, the built-in defragmenter may just run endlessly in an attempt to defragment the disk but it very well may never happen.
Scheduling itself is also a problem. Not only must defragmentation be scheduled at a convenient time (which for businesses running multiple shifts are quickly disappearing) but someone must take the time to set the schedule. For multiple computers, this can be a real demand on valuable hours.
The most effective defragmentation solution for Windows systems is one that is fully automatic, running whenever possible using only idle resources, never interfering with work being performed. It also requires no scheduling, so that also is no longer a problem.
Contact:
Bruce Boyers Marketing Services
Email: Email Contact
Published March 27, 2008 Reads 2,723
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Marketwire .
Copyright © 2009 Marketwire. All rights reserved. All the news releases provided by Market Wire are copyrighted. Any forms of copying other than an individual user's personal reference without express written permission is prohibited. Further distribution of these materials is strictly forbidden, including but not limited to, posting, emailing, faxing, archiving in a public database, redistributing via a computer network or in a printed form.
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Portable Experimenter’s Platform, Powered by Raspberry Pi
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- AMAX Launches StorMax(TM) CFS, powered by IBM(R) General Parallel File System(TM) (GPFS(TM))
- NIST to Sponsor FFRDC Widespread Adoption of Integrated CyberSecurity
- Red Hat Hires Azure Guy to Run Virtualization
- Project Floodlight Grows to the World’s Largest SDN Ecosystem; Global Users, Contributors and Partners Innovating Using Open Source SDN
- HotLink Debuts Amazon EC2 Plug-in for Microsoft SCVMM with Latest Release of HotLink Hybrid Express
- Cloud Business Solutions, Social Media, and Platform Systems of Engagement Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2013 to 2019
- Rackspace and Red Hat Celebrate Victory over Troll
- Cloud People: A Who's Who of Cloud Computing
- Windows Azure IaaS Reaches General Availability
- Portable Experimenter’s Platform, Powered by Raspberry Pi
- SUSE Receives Common Criteria Security Certifications
- Session Topics: 12th Cloud Expo / Cloud Expo New York
- Red Hat Unveils Big Data and Open Hybrid Cloud Direction
- Granular Enforcement of Access to File Systems Featured in Latest Release of FoxT ServerControl
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Red Hat Spin-Off Simplifies Orchestration
- AMAX Launches StorMax(TM) CFS, powered by IBM(R) General Parallel File System(TM) (GPFS(TM))
- NIST to Sponsor FFRDC Widespread Adoption of Integrated CyberSecurity
- Red Hat Hires Azure Guy to Run Virtualization
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- SCO CEO Posts Open Letter to the Open Source Community
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- Why Recovering a Deleted Ext3 File Is Difficult . . .




















