| By Maureen O'Gara | Article Rating: |
|
| May 4, 2008 08:15 AM EDT | Reads: |
4,195 |
SCO and Novell have been in court this week trying to figure
out how much SCO is supposed to owe Novell in royalties for its attempt to tax
Linux.
Published May 4, 2008 Reads 4,195
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
About Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.
![]() |
Wayne 05/04/08 01:52:55 AM EDT | |||
Hum a few problems with this. Let's see: 'SCO and Novell have been in court this week trying to figure out how much SCO is supposed to owe Novell in royalties for its attempt to tax Linux.' You forgot to mention that this is due to SCO suing Novell. The Judge determined that Novell was in the right. 'This is the money that SCO claims it doesn’t owe Novell at all because Novell signed away its source code rights and can only claim royalties on binaries.' And that the judge has already ruled that to do owe. 'The trial, in front of SCO’s least favorite judge, started with Novell taking about $7 million off of its claim because it knew it didn’t have a pray on that account and so they’re now down to talking about less than $20 million.' Didn't have a pray? Don't you mean "Didn't have a prayer?" I'd like to suggest another possibility, that Novell may have dropped the amount as they think that this is all SCO would be able to pay. 'Novell, yes, Novell, called SCO CEO Darl McBride as a witness and he managed to work at least one letter Novell wrote saying SCO owned everything – including the copyrights the court said it didn’t own – into the conversation. The other letters are on SCO web site.' Did you read all of Darl's testimony? I did. Based on what I read, I would not buy a used car from that man. We won't know until the judge issues his ruling, but I think that he will rule in Novell's favor. |
||||
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- Why an Application Grid?
- Will Ulitzer Dominate News Content on The Web? -Gartner
- Building Private and Hybrid Clouds with Ubuntu 9.04
- Ulitzer Responds to Published Reports
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- Sun Upgrades VirtualBox
- Should Developers Care About Cloud Computing?
- Ted Weissman and Lois Paul & Partners PR Firm
- How to Rebuild a Home Network Integrating Ubuntu and Mac OS X
- Ulitzer’s Amazing First 30 Days in Public Beta
- Initial Thoughts on IBM Acquisition of Sun Microsystems
- Amazon Fiddles with Utility Pricing
- Why an Application Grid?
- Will Ulitzer Dominate News Content on The Web? -Gartner
- Micro Focus Offers Micro Focus COBOL for Eclipse
- Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz Scopes Out Future for Sun's Cloud
- Building Private and Hybrid Clouds with Ubuntu 9.04
- SCO Files Reorg Plan
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?
- i-Technology Viewpoint: The New Paradigm of IT Buying








































