| By Jeremy Geelan | Article Rating: |
|
| November 6, 2008 08:15 AM EST | Reads: |
4,530 |
"There is already sort of a cloud ecosystem out there in the world of PHP," notes Sun's Tim Bray in a recent post. "There are a whole bunch of competitive vendors where you can upload a bunch of .php files and database dumps and with only a moderate amount of twiddling, get your app running," he adds.
"I’m simply not interested in any cloud offering at any level unless it offers zero barrier-to-exit," declares Bray, who as the co-inventor of XML has been a lifelong proponent of standards.
The opportunity presented by the advent of pay-as-you-go infrastructure, Bray says, is substantial:
"[T]he current economic climate is going to get in the way of anything that requires laying out capital. In this light, cloud computing starts to look good for the same reason that Open Source looks good: low up-front costs. So, just like everyone else, I think technology providers and consumers need to be looking really hard in this direction."
But he sees two flies in the ointment:
"The small problem is that we haven’t quite figured out the architectural sweet spot for cloud platforms. Is it Amazon’s EC2/S3 “Naked virtual whitebox” model? Is it a Platform-as-a-service flavor like Google App Engine? We just don’t know yet..."
And the big problem?
"[I]f cloud computing is going to take off, it absolutely, totally, must be lockin-free. What that means if that I’m deploying my app on Vendor X’s platform, there have to be other vendors Y and Z such that I can pull my app and its data off X and it’ll all run with minimal tweaks on either Y or Z."
In Bray's view, at the moment anyway, he dopesn't think either the Amazon or Google offerings qualify.
Published November 6, 2008 Reads 4,530
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
- "I Didn't Invent XML Dammit," Says Tim Bray
- Are Interoperable Cloud Platforms Achievable?
- Tim Bray: "iPod? Blackberry? Texting? Not For Me, Thanks"
- XML Pioneer Bray: "Secret-Source Software...Looks Weirder and Weirder"
- The Co-Inventor of XML, Sun's Tim Bray, Speaks Out On Blogging, Web 2.0, XML, and the Future
- Virtualization Conference Europe 2009: 18-19 May 2009 in Prague
More Stories By Jeremy Geelan
Jeremy Geelan is Sr. Vice-President of SYS-CON Media & Events. He is Conference Chair of the all-new International Cloud Computing Conference & Expo series, of the International Virtualization Conference & Expo series, of AJAXWorld RIA Conference & Expo series, and of the long-running SOAWorld Conference & Expo series. He's founder of Cloud Computing Journal, Web 2.0 Journal, AJAX & RIA Journal and other leading SYS-CON titles. From 2000-6, as first editorial director and then group publisher of SYS-CON Media, he was responsible for the development of all new titles and i-Technology portals for the firm, and regularly represents SYS-CON at conferences and trade shows, speaking to technology audiences both in North America and overseas. He is executive producer and presenter of "Power Panels with Jeremy Geelan" on SYS-CON.TV.
![]() |
ericnovikoff 11/07/08 12:01:16 PM EST | |||
I am impressed to see a simple and fresh perspective on the cloud. Notwithstanding all the hype about the cloud, I see the minimum value that it has to provide is "hosting done right." If we face the facts, most if not all of the "hosting" advertised on the internet is oversold, resulting in hosting getting a bad rap, and certainly only of interest to small businesses or low-end consumers. Cloud computing has the opportunity to go beyond that bad rap, and embracing Bray's tenets is one way to do that. Vendor-independence certainly will lead vendors to clean up their acts! There are other potential (and mostly unrealized) advantages of cloud computing as well which I think will give it a better name than hosting: I'm not convinced PHP is the only way to go here. Once you bring a language into the discussion, you bring religion into the discussion! There are other languages that would easily quality as "cloud ready" including Google's choice of Python. And let's not forget Java, which our customers have been very successful with. What's more important is the quality, interoperability, and portability the service provides - in other words, the value. This is because ultimately value is measured in the people-time and organizational effort required to deploy to the cloud, not just the cost per CPU-hour. |
||||
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Practical Approaches for Optimizing Website Performance
- 1st Annual GovIT Expo: Letter from the Technical Chair
- Ulitzer News: Search vs New Media
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- The End of IT 1.0 As We Know It Has Begun
- Ubuntu-based Open Source Linux Mint Tests KDE Version
- Cloud CEOs, CTOs & SVPs to Speak at 4th International Cloud Computing Expo
- Practical Approaches for Optimizing Website Performance
- Is Cloud Computing Like Teenage Sex?
- 1st Annual GovIT Expo: Letter from the Technical Chair
- Ulitzer News: Search vs New Media
- Ruby-on-Rails Apps Get Cloud Lift
- Publishing Synergy: Blog, Twitter and Ulitzer
- The Difference Between Web Hosting and Cloud Computing
- Cloud Computing Expo: Exclusive Q&A with Yahoo! SVP Cloud Computing
- GovIT Expo Highlights Cloud Computing
- The i-Technology Right Stuff
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: Linus Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux
- After Ubuntu, Windows Looks Increasingly Bad, Increasingly Archaic, Increasingly Unfriendly
- Linus' Top Ten SCO Barbs
- A Closer Look at Damn Small Linux
- Netscape Co-Founder's 12 Reasons for Growth of Open Source
- Introducing "Cooperative Linux" - Linux for Windows, No Less
- *POINT - COUNTERPOINT SPECIAL* What's Wrong with the Open Source Community?
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- Linux.SYS-CON.com Exclusive: What Would UserLinux Look Like?


























